|
View: 2752|Reply: 19
|
[Dunia]
LCS punya pasal, Netizen China gelar Singapura "Li Jiapo"
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Edited by dcruins at 23-8-2016 08:58 AM
PM Lee jr. jaga2 kalau nak main dengan big brother,sebagai negara yg tak der tuntutan kat Spratly, lebih baik neutral jerrr kata sesetengah rakyat nyerrr. propaganda nationalism terlajak sedang marak kat China ketika ni,jaga2......
tapi ada gak pandangan yang realistik.....
satu lagi "Dilema Sino" in the making setelah Taiwan & Hong Kong???media2 China sejak Lee jr. pulang dari Washington pun macam dah mula keluar berita2 yg tak mesra Singapura,tengok jerrr media milik si Jack Ma etc tuuu....
apakah strategi lobbying China kat politik Thailand dimana satu lagi Dinasti Cina Hakka(Thakshin) dijatuhkan & diganti dengan junta yg pro China(kata sesetengah rakyat Thai) akan berlaku di Singapura secara sedar atau tak sedar???hmmmmm....
-----------------------------------
Chinese social media users lash out at Singapore over S China Sea dispute
Weibo postings mock PM Lee’s brief fainting spell when delivering National Day Rally speech
Published: 4:00 AM, August 23, 2016
http://m.todayonline.com/chinaindia/china/chinese-social-media-users-lash-out-singapore-over-s-china-sea-dispute
SINGAPORE — Chinese social media users have ramped up their criticisms against Singapore, amid the belief that the city state has not been particularly sympathethic towards China’s position on overlapping territorial claims in the South China Sea.
“Do not for a moment think that Li Jiapo has ever been friendly towards China,” wrote a weibo user — China’s version of Twitter — yesterday.
The term “Li Jiapo” — referring to Singapore’s name in Chinese but substituting the first two Chinese characters for “Li Jia” or the “Lee Family” — has been used in China’s social media to mock the Republic.
“After Lee Hsien Loong came to power, he changed his father’s policy of being friendly towards China. In fact, he has been backstabbing China? Why is this so?”
Another weibo user said Singapore has always indulged in “political speculation”. “The country’s survival has always been based on political speculation (among the major powers),” the user stated.
As news broke on Sunday that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had experienced a brief fainting spell while delivering the National Day Rally, a weibo posting said: “There will be a change of leadership in Li Jiapo soon. Expect a change in their national policies.”
“For the sake of your health, please do not strain yourself over the South China Sea issue,” said another sarcastic social media posting.
China claims a large swath of the South China Sea. Four countries from the Association of South-east Asian Nations (Asean) — Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines — as well as Taiwan also have claims to the strategic waterway, through which US$5 trillion (S$6.8 trillion) in shipborne trade passes every year.
An international tribunal last month invalidated China’s claims in the South China Sea but it has vowed to ignore the ruling.
Singapore is the country coordinator for Asean-China Dialogue Relations and some Chinese media outlets have carried articles criticising Singapore for not siding more with China.
Earlier this month, China’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement asking Singapore to “respect” its position on the South China Sea ruling. “The related ruling is illegal, invalid and has no binding force,” said Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Hua Chunying.
“China hopes that Singapore ... can maintain an objective and fair position as the coordinator of China and Asean dialogue relations, so as to advance Sino-Singapore relations and healthy and stable China-Asean ties.”
Chinese Vice-Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin last week also reportedly urged Singapore to stay out of the South China Sea dispute.
“As Singapore is not a claimant in the South China Sea, we hope that the Singapore Government, on the condition of not interfering in South China Sea issues, will actively promote cooperation between China and Asean,” Mr Liu said.
During his National Day Rally speech on Sunday, Mr Lee said that Singapore-China ties were much broader than the South China Sea issue.
Noting that some Singaporeans are concerned about how some Chinese media outlets have been critical of Singapore and this may affect business linkages, Mr Lee said: “The Government has to take a national point of view, decide what is in Singapore’s overall interests.”
“We want good relations with other countries if it is at all possible. But we must be prepared for ups and downs from time to time.” He also said that Singapore is good friends with both Washington and Beijing.
Some Chinese social media users were more understanding of Singapore’s national circumstances.
“I wonder what is the mentality behind those who are criticising Lee Hsien Loong. Singapore is a sovereign state and it must, of course, first and foremost consider its own national interests,” noted a weibo user yesterday.
The user added that although there may be many Chinese residing in Singapore, the times and circumstances have changed.
“Do you think this is still the past when everyone was a subject of the Qing Dynasty?... If you are free, please read more books, spend less time on social media and use your brains.” AGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Li-Gapore laaaa katakannnn......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by dcruins at 23-8-2016 09:37 AM
LCS punyerrrr effect kat Li-Gapore atau Li-Jiapo, Big Brother semakin mendidih, entah2 missile jarak jauh mereka sedia dilancarkan ke Temasek,dimana Amerika park mesin perang mereka kat Temasek, kat situ laaa target missile China tu menghala, pesawat spy Poseidon Yanks kat Temasek tuuu sasaran empuk tuuu .....
-----------------------------
There may be trouble ahead for China and Singapore
- Island nation’s policy of not choosing sides comes under stress from its position on the South China Sea
PUBLISHED : Monday, 22 August, 2016, 9:03am
UPDATED : Monday, 22 August, 2016, 10:18am
http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2006266/there-may-be-trouble-ahead-china-and-singapore
In the summer of 2000, Jiang Zemin found himself waiting at one of the cavernous halls within the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. The Chinese leader was on hand to receive the former Singapore prime minister Lee Kuan Yew who was visiting the capital. A short but respectful distance away stood a pack of Singapore journalists.
In a gallant attempt to make small talk, Jiang remarked at how similar Singaporeans and Chinese, zhong guo ren, were in appearance. It was almost impossible to tell the two apart, he quipped as he peered at us through his thick trademark glasses. While he might have said it half in jest, it was a statement often repeated in earnest by Chinese leaders during the countless Sino-Singapore meetings covered by this journalist in the past two decades.
Perhaps it was this outward similarity and the implied oneness that in recent weeks partly prompted the strong criticisms – some say outbursts – within China over the island state’s stance on the South China Sea dispute.
Is the vitriol a sign of trouble ahead in the relationship?
The latest salvo against Singapore for its comments on the dispute came from the Chinese vice-minister for foreign affairs, Liu Zhenmin . Last Tuesday, the top diplomat said that as a non-claimant state, Singapore should butt out. He also urged Singapore to do better in coordinating dialogue between China and the Association of South East Asian Nations (Asean).
After the Hague-based tribunal rejected China’s claims in the dispute, Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had said the verdict delivered a strong statement about international law in maritime disputes. During a trip to the United States earlier this month, Lee also told American President Barack Obama that Singapore hoped Washington would remain actively engaged in the region.
The statements have riled people in many quarters.
Even before the ruling, there were signs China was getting irritated. In June, a Global Times commentary by Chinese Academy of Social Sciences researcher Cheng Bifan ran under the headline “Singapore has picked the wrong target in its balance of power strategy”.
The latest comments against Singapore were a reality check that its long-standing approach of not taking sides was being challenged, said political scientist Ja Ian Chong from the National University of Singapore.
The policy of “not choosing sides” only worked under certain conditions: when relations between China and the US, or when the relationships between either major power and the majority of other regional actors, were stable and relaxed, Chong said.
“If not, then it becomes easy for one of the major powers or both to demand greater partiality from Singapore. Playing to the middle, as Singapore has done, could seem unhelpful or duplicitous in either or both Washington and Beijing.”
China was seeking to modify regional norms that have the US as the dominant power while “Washington and other actors, including Singapore, are more satisfied with the status quo.”
This disjunct “undergirds the dispute about the South China Sea beyond the actual ownership of particular islands and waters. As a result, Beijing’s relations with countries that prefer the status quo will likely be more fraught”, said Chong.
However, Wang Yiwei from the School of International Relations at China’s Renmin University believed China’s “disappointment” with Singapore stemmed from Beijing’s initial hopes that the island state could play a bridging role not just between China and Asean, but also with the US, the West and the global community.
Singapore had not adequately protected the overall and long-term interests of China and Asean, despite being the coordinator between them, he said. “Instead, Singapore suggested China should accept the tribunal’s ruling. This was a huge turn-off for China,” Wang said. 
When it came to the provision of safety and security in the South China Sea, China and the US, “not just the US”, could collaborate, Wang said. “Protecting sovereignty and territorial integrity does not come into direct conflict with providing public goods that will help ensure peace and stability in the South China Sea,” he said.
Singapore needed to display “the wisdom of [former prime minister] Lee Kuan Yew’s era, which provided a better and more cautious balance between China and the US”, to gain the trust of both parties, he said.
But Wang Chong, deputy secretary-general with the Charhar Institute, a Chinese think tank, thought ­
Sino-Singaporean ties would not be fundamentally strained as Singapore’s security alignment with the US was well known.
China’s stronger-than-usual criticism was to be expected, he said, given Beijing’s recent foreign policy posture of “strengthening diplomacy by using stronger language” on countries such as South Korea and Singapore, which have been heavily reliant on America for security but China for continued economic prosperity.
Chinese internet users have been stinging in their criticisms, labelling Singapore a sycophant of the US, threatening that China will teach it a lesson.
Particularly stinging is the phrase they often use to mock Singapore: “Li Jiapo”, a play on the island’s name in Chinese, substituting the first two Chinese characters in its name for“Li Jia” or the “Lee family”.
Relations between Singapore and China are often touted as special and unique – as exemplified by the close ties between former leaders Deng Xiaoping (and Lee Kuan Yew.
Ties have also evolved in line with changing needs and development priorities. Last year, the two countries agreed to establish an “all round cooperative partnership progressing with the times”.
But ties have been tested before – such as when Lee Hsien Loong visited Taiwan before he became prime minister in 2004, or when Lee Kuan Yew visited the US in 2010 and called on Washington to play an active role in Asia to balance China. But ties have always rebounded.
So long as Singapore refrains from further comments that might aggravate the situation, analysts believe relations should go back to an even keel. After all, Singapore has already made its position on the South China Sea abundantly clear, and that position – whether their people are similar-looking or not – cannot be anymore different than China’s.
Maria Siow is a Singaporean journalist based in Beijing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mentang2 la dia power dari segi military, habis semua negara dia nk buli... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tu laaaa dia ego semulajadi yang akan timbul bila dah jadi negara super power....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China bukannya kuat sangat. Hari ini pun dah dibuli oleh amerika. Masa hadapan...entah dibuli lebih teruk oleh siapa pula |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aku dengar2, china akan boikot korea selatan pulak lepas ni
x sure pasal apa, tapi ade kaitan ngan US
retis2 korea selatan dah tak boleh datang ke china
cepat sentap rupenya china ni, insecure kot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... Ni semua sensasi aje macam selalunya, takde bende pun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sensasi sinis "Li Jiapo", dah melekat di otak nationalist China,siapa jerrrr yg sentuh China, rakyat China akan bangkit menyerang, tu laaaa situasi China sebenar hari ni......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuuu Pasal Amerika piii letak anti ballistic missile THAAD canggih kot kat S.Korea.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by dcruins at 23-8-2016 11:05 AM
Netizen2 China yg semakin rancak menyerang Li-Jiapo tentu gembira dengan moment ni.....
quote netizen China dari artikel post#1,
"As news broke on Sunday that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had experienced a brief fainting spell while delivering the National Day Rally, a weibo posting said: “There will be a change of leadership in Li Jiapo soon. Expect a change in their national policies.”
“For the sake of your health, please do not strain yourself over the South China Sea issue,” said another sarcastic social media posting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dah boleh start tanya, Apa lagi negara " Li Jiapo " nak???.... Chung Kuok Ren pun sudaaaaa weibo2 pasal korang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawak gak baca beberapa forum & social media negara "Li Jiapo" perang mulut antara forumer yg pro China & pro Amerika sejak semalam......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Menarik gak antara negara2 penyumbang FDI ke "Li Jiapo" ni, sebab tuuuuu tak hairan policy luar negara Li Jiapo ni dilihat netizen China lebih condong ke Amerika.....
ni quote aku ambik dari satu forum mereka,
----------------------
--------------------
fuhhhhh, FDI kena lalu tax haven duluuuuu macam Amerika(mereka ada Delaware,Jersey etc), British Virgin Island laaaa,Cayman Island laaa, Netherland(kalau korang nak tau, ni laaa negara raja shell company guna mailbox jerrrr, Lehmann Brother punya money track pun sampai kat negara ni gakkk,Luxembourg pun sama.....) , wet dream structured finance niii.....
FDI ---> tax haven(mana2 tax haven yg kat atas)---->tax haven(Li Jiapo) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DynastiCracy vs Communist.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tapi tak perrr, "Li Jiapo" pun dibagi peluang sewa Panda gakkkk.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cina Mainland gaduh dgn Cina Singaporn, Indon tepuk tangan  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 23-8-2016 08:56 AM
变色卡
Author
