Forbes diboikot kerana tersalah letak nilai aset

R2D2

KAHERAH 6 Mac - Putera Arab Saudi, Alwaleed Talal yang merupakan individu terkaya di dunia Arab dilaporkan memboikot majalah Forbes atas alasan ia memandang rendah nilai kekayaannya.

Menurut syarikatnya, Forbes baru-baru ini menyenaraikan Alwaleed sebagai bilionair pada tangga ke-26 dengan anggaran nilai kekayaan sebanyak AS$20 bilion (RM62 bilion).

"Forbes menggunakan data yang tidak tepat untuk menetapkan kedudukan sebenar Putera Alwaleed," jelasnya. - dpa

kueh_kueh

tu pon nak tersentap...patutnya bersyukurlah...arab tak sedar diri

DeMax

Forbes menghina Islam, tersentap 1Tanah Melayu

JunkMail

ni je tahap soltan bayangan tuhan penjaga kaabah?

Sagun36

Ingatkan melayu je mudah sentap, arab kaya raya 100 keturunan x habis makan pun sentap gak.

DayangKirana

memandang rendah katenye..

takbur btul..nak satu donia tahu betapa kayanya dia..

timahhitam

sama lah tuh....sama-sama jenis pemutar alam....arab vs mat saleh....

chaintea

26 billion tu x cukup kah?
nak 1trilion baru puas hati kamu?
x tahu agaknya berat nak jwb di akhirat nanti ke mana harta disalurkan

takbur bongkak

AngahSopi

Gila bongkak... Puihh

prettyuglybabe

orang kalu kaya lagi mau diam-diam. takut kena rompak, kena culik

zorrro_03

JunkMail posted on 6-3-2013 09:34 AM
ni je tahap soltan bayangan tuhan penjaga kaabah?

apa nak kaitkan Kaabah bagai dlm isu spt ni.  laknatullah sungguh laa.

mk-sabio

zorrro_03 posted on 6-3-2013 10:44 AM
apa nak kaitkan Kaabah bagai dlm isu spt ni.  laknatullah sungguh laa.

maksud dia arab saudi kan penjaga mekah.

zorrro_03

mk-sabio posted on 6-3-2013 10:51 AM
maksud dia arab saudi kan penjaga mekah.

kalau lembu tu nak menghina induvidu berkenaan lantak dia lah.  tapi jgn nak kaitkan dgn Kaabah etc2.

mk-sabio

ramai pemimpin arab perangai macam anjing.

R2D2

ada satu parti tu tersentap sebab penganalisis ramal byk kerusi akan hilang
tu baru ramalan pun dh tersentap....

sueism

Dunia nie Ramai yg suka sentap benda kecik2 nie

DeMax

Parti Moro Semalaysia. Amcm? Blh dpt sambutan tak? Yg dpt IC free tu tetap vote pny

NBH

sentap macam Donald Trump jugak ka?


Donald Trump is suing a writer for claiming he is a millionaire and not a billionaire.

Trump claims his reputation and brand were damaged by Timothy O'Brien's article Photo: REUTERS
8:21AM BST 19 May 2009
The real estate mogul has launched a lawsuit against Timothy L. O'Brien who questioned Trump's net worth in article in 2005.
Trump claims his reputation and brand were damaged and that he missed out on business opportunities because of the story.
A judge said that she would rule within two months on whether the case should be dismissed before it gets a chance to go to trial.
Neither man was in Superior Court in Camden for a hearing on Monday.
Trump said O'Brien, now an editor at The New York Times, knew the lower estimates were not true and that it was malicious to include them.
Related Articles
Trump's ￡300m golf estate 29 Apr 2006
In a December 2007 deposition in the case, Trump says his true net worth is harder to calculate because it includes the value of the Trump brand.
"My net worth fluctuates and it goes up and down with markets and with attitudes and with feelings," he said. "Even my own feelings."
In the same deposition, Trump acknowledged that he sometimes exaggerates – including when he said, after the book's publication, that his business was doing as well as ever.
"You wouldn't tell a reporter you're doing poorly," he explained. "If I'm doing poorly, I'd rather not comment."
On Monday, Trump's lawyer, William Tambussi, told Judge Michele Fox that O'Brien knew that including a value of Trump's worth would get attention "so he could sell more books".
O'Brien's lawyer, Andrew Ceresney, told the judge that Trump's claims were false because the net worth numbers were not made maliciously, because Trump can't prove that he lost business as a result – and that there's nothing hurtful about the claim.
"If someone came in here and said, 'Mr Ceresney, you're worth $150 million to $250 million,' I think I'd feel pretty good," he told the judge. "I wouldn't call that defamation."