Pensyarah UM akan didakwa di bawah Akta Hasutan esok

ajie2000

Pensyarah UM akan didakwa di bawah Akta Hasutan esok
Astro Awani | Kemas kini: September 01, 2014
(Diterbitkan pada: September 01, 2014 18:06 MYT)


KUALA LUMPUR: Pensyarah Undang-Undang Universiti Malaya, Prof Dr Azmi Sharom akan dihadapkan ke Mahkamah Sesyen Kuala Lumpur di bawah Akta Hasutan esok, lapor Malay Mail Online.

Azmi akan didakwa berhubung satu artikel yang disiarkan dalam portal berita yang sama pada 14 Ogos lalu berkaitan krisis menteri besar Selangor.

Malay Mail Online dalam laporannya memetik Polis Dang Wangi berkata Azmi akan didakwa Seksyen 4(1)(b) Akta Hasutan 1948.

Sementara The Malaysian Insider pula melaporkan Azmi mengesahkan telah menerima panggilan telefon meminta beliau ke mahkamah esok.

"Saya terima panggilan minta saya hadir. Tidak ada surat tentang itu," Azmi dipetiks ebagai berkata oleh The Malaysian Insider.

Minggu lepas, Ahli Parlimen Shah Alam, Khalid Samad dan Anggota Dewan Undangan Negeri (Adun) Sri Delima, RSN Rayer didakwa di mahkamah di bawah akta yang sama.


Read more at: http://www.astroawani.com/news/s ... sutan-esok-42978?cp

............

Lepas ni boleh lah berenti jadik pensyarah masuk jer politik..

cloudy_83

artikel yang mana satu heolls tulis ye

Pajeri_Nenas

hahaha, dr azmi dah kena. dia dlm kelas best, lawak dan sarcastic

PongKang

azmi sharom ni witty. nape dia kene?

famri7

Semoga menyesali kesalahan lalu bertaubat selayaknya.

ellZack

Take Perak crisis route for speedy end to Selangor impasse, Pakatan told.

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 14 — Pakatan Rakyat (PR) can gamble on the move that triggered the 2009 Perak constitutional crisis if the pact wants to end the Selangor mentri besar crisis ahead of the next assembly sitting, constitutional law experts have said.

With the next state legislative assembly only due to sit in November, a motion of no confidence to remove Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim as Selangor mentri besar may have to wait until then, prolonging the crisis in the state administration.

But PR need not wait that long, according to the legal experts, as its assemblymen can demonstrate their lack of confidence in beleaguered Khalid outside the House..

“The ball is in PR’s court, really. They must establish either through the House or otherwise, that he doesn’t have the support.

“Only then can they set the gears in motion to remove Khalid,” civil liberties lawyer Syahredzan Johan told Malay Mail Online.

Syahredzan suggested that this can be established through “extraneous means”, which include a statutory declaration, a letter, or even a direct audience with the Sultan of Selangor.

“They can do it anytime; what matters is they have the numbers. They can do it tomorrow,” said Prof Dr Abdul Aziz Bari, when asked how soon PR assemblymen could move to oust Khalid.

The Selangor University (Unisel) law lecturer also concurred with Syahredzan, saying that the display of no confidence can be done outside the House to show that the majority is not with Khalid.

“This is enough to give Khalid and the palace the signal,” he added.

But the move against a mentri besar outside the state assembly raises the spectre of the Perak crisis, as Syahredzan himself noted the precedent set by the case.

The Perak crisis was triggered in February 2009 after three PR assemblymen defected, causing the state government to collapse.

BN then formed the new state government after Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak had an audience with the Sultan of Perak, together with 31 assemblymen who stated that they had no confidence in embattled PR MB Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin.

The decision was challenged in court and doubts over its legitimacy were not removed until a year later, when the Federal Court upheld an earlier decision by the Court of Appeal that Barisan Nasional’s (BN) Datuk Dr Zambry Abd Kadir was the rightful MB.

Citing the Perak case, law lecturer Assoc Prof Dr Azmi Sharom cautioned against such action outside the state assembly, and insisted the lawmakers wait until next sitting to indicate their lack of confidence.

“You don’t want a repeat of that, where a secret meeting took place,” the University of Malaya lecturer said, referring to the Perak crisis.

“I think what happened in Perak was legally wrong. The best thing to do is do it as legally and transparently as possible.”

Azmi said the open spectacle of a no-confidence motion would leave Khalid no choice but to resign from his post and possibly call for the dissolution of the state assembly,

“A vote by the house of representative should be done in the house of representative,” said Azmi.

The now party-less Khalid has so far resisted all attempts by his former colleagues in PKR to remove him, staying on in his post as mentri besar even after his sacking from the party last Saturday.

The embattled leader did so with the backing of the Selangor Sultan, who has so far indicated that he sees no need for Khalid to step down even though the latter is no longer a part of PR, which collectively commands the majority of the Selangor assembly.

Khalid also has the support of the state’s 12 Umno assemblymen, with deputy Umno president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin saying earlier this week that all the party’s representatives in Selangor will vote in favour of the mentri besar should any no-confidence motion be tabled in the House.

To further cement his position, Khalid one-upped his former PR allies when he sacked five of six DAP and PKR lawmakers from the state executive council on Tuesday. Once again, he did so with the Sultan’s blessing.

At present, Khalid now has a remaining five exco members under his wing in the council — four from PAS who have so far indicated their continued support for him, and a fifth member from PKR who was out of town when the sacking order was issued.

Khalid’s position was thrown into question after PKR’s disciplinary committee expelled him on Saturday ostensibly for his open defiance of the party’s decision that he must step down to make way for PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail.

Khalid’s sacking leaves the coalition in a precarious state and will add to worries that snap polls may have to be called to ward off a stalemate.

Without Khalid, PKR’s share of the 56-seat Selangor state assembly drops to 13 from 14 while allies DAP and PAS have 15 seats each. Umno, the opposition in the state, holds 12.

“Khalid can remain as MB so long as there is no vote of no confidence against him. To succeed PR must at least get 29 assemblyman supporting the motion,” said Aziz.

pasal statement dalam article ni kalau tak silap yang buat dia kena sediction act.

ellZack

puterikhaleeda

aikkk cakap mcm tu pun dah kira hasut?

dauswq

aku tgk banyak plak kes melibatkan kritikan kerajaan & sedikit mengenai sultan kena bwh akta hasutan ni..

walhal ade kes yg dh berulat, tp baru kena charge skrg..
cth nizar &  lain2 tu

nak kate polis lambat bukak kes,
tu khalid samad , rafizi & sunderan komen bbrp hari lepas dh kena bw balai & terus kena charge dlm mahkamah..

kenapa baru skrg sekali harung kena?
akta hasutan baru dikuatkuasakan ker?

dauswq

tak lama lagi prof agus pun kena gak...

dia pun kadang2 bg stekmen berkias2 mcm dr. azmi baharom ni

dauswq

aku rasa PEKIDA/PERKASA patut kena juga fairly didakwa bwh akta hasutan

laporan polis sudah dibuat..

tp pendakwaraya lambat buat kerja atau amik tak endah jek

kalau melibatkan kes spt di atas ni, laju jek depa amik tindakan

hmmmmm

dauswq

Pensyarah undang-undang UM dituduh menghasut



Pensyarah undang-undang Universiti Malaya (UM) Prof Madya Dr Azmi Sharom Azmi Sharom mengaku tidak bersalah atas tuduhan bawah Akta Hasutan 1948 hari ini.

Azmi dikenakan bayaran ikat jamin RM5,000 dan sebutan kes ditetapkan pada 3 Ogos.

Beliau diudakwa bawah Seksyen 4(1)(b) Akta Hasutan itu, dengan pendakwaan pilihan bawah Seksyen 4(1)(c) akta yang sama, iaitu mengeluarkan kenyataan menghasut pada 15 Ogos lalu.

Kertas pendakwaan menyebut Azmi didakwa mengeluarkan kenyataan itu di Jabatan Siasatan Jenayah Polis Kuala Lumpur.

Jika sabit kesalahan, Azmi boleh didenda maksimum RM5,000 atau tiga tahun penjara atau kedua-duanya.

Kira-kira 100 orang hadir menyokong pensyarah itu ketika beliau dituduh di mahkamah hari ini.

Antara mereka aktivis Datuk Marina Mahathir dan Zainah Anwar, anggota parlimen Lembah Pantai dan mahasiswa UM.

znuyul

nati kena pecat jawatan ke??

kecimpret

ellZack posted on 2-9-2014 01:27 PM
pasal statement dalam article ni kalau tak silap yang buat dia kena sediction act.

cakap camtu je kena dakwa?


Israel pun x camni

atira

ellZack posted on 2-9-2014 01:27 PM
pasal statement dalam article ni kalau tak silap yang buat dia kena sediction act.

le...sapa la manusia yg hati sendu sgt... sampai ni pon boleh sentap sampai kene dakwa...
baik tok sah hidup manusia sendu begini

Anak_Nogori

Kalau tak melakukan kesalahan apa nak takut..pertahankan diri dimahkahmah..bukan pertahankan diri dgn bertanya pula.kenapa aku kena yg dia tu tidak..

kecimpret

“I think what happened in Perak was legally wrong. The best thing to do is do it as legally and transparently as possible.”

ayat ni kot pemerintah butthurt sgt...baru aku tau professor law x leh lontarkan idea & pandangan sendiri..kalo x selari dgn pemerintah leh didakwa bwh akta hasutan...patut laa level pendidikan makin teruk...serupa negara kominis plak

ellZack

kecimpret posted on 2-9-2014 02:54 PM
cakap camtu je kena dakwa?

tersentap mungkin..

ellZack

kecimpret posted on 2-9-2014 02:54 PM
cakap camtu je kena dakwa?

tersentap mungkin..

ellZack

kecimpret posted on 2-9-2014 03:09 PM
ayat ni kot pemerintah butthurt sgt...baru aku tau professor law x leh lontarkan idea & pandangan  ...

kalau ikut syahredzan, memang sebab ayat ni.. dengan ayat yang secret meeting tu..