Hindu bunuh pelahap lembu

Acong

Muslim man killed over cow slaughter in India

Press TV
WATCH: The death of a Muslim man, murdered by a mob who accused him of slaughtering and eating a cow, has dominated the Indian media in the past few days.

https://www.facebook.com/PRESSTV/videos/999431773431943/


bahalol punya penganut........... siapa kata hindu tak boleh makan lembu?

puiii........! perangai sama bahalol cam penganut meleis yg kata haram sentuh anjing & babi  

agama sendiri pun tak tau? pi mampus lagi elok

Acong

A Buddhist’s analysis of meat and beef eating in ancient India (by Shravasti Dhammika)
On July 13, 2013, in Uncategorized, by sabhlok

From TO EAT OR NOT TO EAT MEAT, A BUDDHIST REFLECTIONS. BUDDHA DHAMMA MANDALA SOCIETY 2010  [Word version]

There is no evidence that Brahmanism, the main religion during the Buddha’s time, taught vegetarianism. Vedic sacrifices in which animals were slaughtered were still being practiced and are frequently mentioned in the Tipitaka (e.g. Anguttara Nikaya I,66; II,42; IV,41). However, the Vinaya mentions what were called maghata, certain days of the month when animals were not slaughtered and meat was not available in the markets (Vinaya I,217). The Jataka also mentions maghata and adds that they would be announced by the beat of a drum (Jataka IV,115). Were these non-killing days a result of a general unease about meat eating, or due to the influence of Buddhism, or of Jainism? We don’t know. The Kama Sutra (3rd cent CE?) points out that alcohol and dog meat increase a man’s virility but then adds, somewhat halfheartedly, that a circumspect man would nonetheless take neither. It also gives recipes for aphrodisiacs, many of them including animal flesh and organs. So once again we have an ambiguous attitude towards consuming meat.

Neither of the two great Hindu epics, the Ramayana and the Mahabharata teach vegetarianism and both often refer to eating meat as if it were normal and uncontroversial, as indeed it was. In his detailed study of everyday life as depicted in the Ramayana Ananda Guruge writes, “The Aryans of ancient India were not altogether vegetarians. Their diet was a mixed one; they ate fish as was offered to Bharata and his party by Guha. Meat too was consumed quite widely. Not only did Rama say that animals are killed by men for their flesh but he also killed many animals – deer, wild boar, antelope, etc., – for food during his sojourn in the forest. Meat was eaten with relish and a verse which describes a meal of Rama and Sita states, ‘He sat on a rock tempting Sita with meat (saying) this is pure, this is tasty and this is well cooked by fire.’ In Bharadvaja’s hermitage Bharata’s army was supplied with venison, mutton, pork and flesh of the peacock and the snipe Likewise, Kumbhakarna consumed large quantities of venison, beef and pork and drank blood. Although the Vanaras are generally depicted as vegetarians, the Brahmans were actually not. The concept that ‘a purely vegetarian diet is an indication of spiritual progress and an advanced culture’ is a later development in India. Even ascetic Brahmans were not strict vegetarians. Although their usual fare consisted of vegetables, they did not abstain from meat-eating as a principle of either religious or social significance. In fact, Agastya is represented as eating rams and he says, ‘I am able to eat comfortably even one whole ram at a Sraddha ceremony.’ There seems to have been no ban on meat-eating by Brahmans even at the time of Bhavabhuti for his Uttararamacarita depicts Vasistha as eating a tawny calf Further, Valin’s statement specifically mentions the animals whose flesh could be eaten by Brahmans. (The Society of the Ramayana, 1960, p.147-8).

In the chapter on food the Sushruta Samhita (1st– 4th cent CE) recommends all kinds of fish, bird and animal flesh showing that meat eating was commonplace during that period. This and a great deal of other evidence shows that like Buddhists, Hindus were for centuries in two minds about vegetarianism. It was only after the 9th, 10th and 11th centuries that vegetarianism started to become widespread in India.

http://beef.sabhlokcity.com/2013/07/a-buddhists-analysis-of-meat-and-beef-eating-in-ancient-india-by-shravasti-dhammika/

Acong

India/Hindu tak makan lembu sbb miskin papa ke dana

Hindu Brahmin ada je makan daging lembu......!

http://www.academia.edu/1365001/Beef_eating_in_the_Hindu_Tradition

Vedic Indians fed their gods their own favourite foods 2 milk, butter, ghee, barley, goats andsheep. But Indra, their mightiest god, destroyer of enemy strongholds, preferred the flesh of the bull. Sometimes he ate one, sometimes fifteen, twenty, a hundred, 300 bulls. Even a thousand buffaloes.1 Agni was not so particular. He mostly liked ghee, but was not averse to horses, bulls, oxen, cows and rams. (RV X.91.14). The third most important god was Soma, and in the Somasacrifice including cows as bali (victim) was crucial. It was the Soma sacrifice that went on tobecome the defining practice that demarcated ?rya from an?rya.2

kerunai

dasar hindu kicap gila babi pprt melarat

usahkan lembu..ayam pun payah nk jumpa

last skali biawak jugak yg dimakan

sebab free

tanya je le budak2 hindu di sjkt

makan mmg jimat che gu... balik skola kejar itu biawak kasik hentam sama batu atau kayu kalo

bawak balik kasik amma juga masak

jimat che gu jimat

nandre

hanakikan

Mmbr hindu aku ckp dia boleh makan tapi kena mandi dengan air susu

TuntungReturn

elok je india sebelah umah aku mkn lembu. aku tny klo dh mkn lembu cm ne? die ckp nnti pi kuil sembahyang taubat...

highcastle

Orang Bali yg agama Hindu pun makan lembu.............

blackwidowbae

Sirloin steak sedap

Acong

petani hindu yg miskin mmg laa tak makan lembu....... kalau dah sembelih, siapa mau bajak sawah/tanah?

HannahMontana

Acong replied at 8-10-2015 01:15 AM
petani hindu yg miskin mmg laa tak makan lembu....... kalau dah sembelih, siapa mau bajak sawah/tana ...

tajuk thread lu bikin gempak tp lu  punya otak bisul lantas lu jadi biul

lembu xdiguna utk membajak

org guna kerbau

lu sbg pelahap babi mesti mau reseach sebelum menNNNNjawab

lu sewel.

mzzenma

Huk aloh hindu ni

Mzz pernah tengok video diorang sapi mata lembu hidup dengan cili..tak ingat utk ritual apa

Makan tak boleh tapi menyeksa binatang tu boleh pula..why so bangang??

Nokiaman

Acong replied at 8-10-2015 01:15 AM
petani hindu yg miskin mmg laa tak makan lembu....... kalau dah sembelih, siapa mau bajak sawah/tana ...

Logik jugak penerangan hang nie....

Modngengade

Ada jer kakak tgk hindu yg mkn babi dan biawak...mungkin mereka ni golongan kasta rendah

taikor

tak paham hindu nak komen2 pasal hindu. kalau bab konspirasi lagi naik syawat mamat ni

alfida

Bodo punya paria...tuhan ko hari2 aku makan...ape afe hal lemboooo

kentel

taikor replied at 8-10-2015 07:51 AM
tak paham hindu nak komen2 pasal hindu. kalau bab konspirasi lagi naik syawat mamat ni

acong malam2 cmni xde peneman...gigih la dia bukak tered cari orang teman

Acong

taikor replied at 8-10-2015 07:51 AM
tak paham hindu nak komen2 pasal hindu. kalau bab konspirasi lagi naik syawat mamat ni

kasta pariah mmg tak makan lembu........ nanti siapa mau jadi lembu pi bajak tanah  




A Buddhist’s analysis of meat and beef eating in ancient India (by Shravasti Dhammika)
On July 13, 2013, in Uncategorized, by sabhlok

From TO EAT OR NOT TO EAT MEAT, A BUDDHIST REFLECTIONS. BUDDHA DHAMMA MANDALA SOCIETY 2010  [Word version]

There is no evidence that Brahmanism, the main religion during the Buddha’s time, taught vegetarianism. Vedic sacrifices in which animals were slaughtered were still being practiced and are frequently mentioned in the Tipitaka (e.g. Anguttara Nikaya I,66; II,42; IV,41). However, the Vinaya mentions what were called maghata, certain days of the month when animals were not slaughtered and meat was not available in the markets (Vinaya I,217). The Jataka also mentions maghata and adds that they would be announced by the beat of a drum (Jataka IV,115). Were these non-killing days a result of a general unease about meat eating, or due to the influence of Buddhism, or of Jainism? We don’t know. The Kama Sutra (3rd cent CE?) points out that alcohol and dog meat increase a man’s virility but then adds, somewhat halfheartedly, that a circumspect man would nonetheless take neither. It also gives recipes for aphrodisiacs, many of them including animal flesh and organs. So once again we have an ambiguous attitude towards consuming meat.

Neither of the two great Hindu epics, the Ramayana and the Mahabharata teach vegetarianism and both often refer to eating meat as if it were normal and uncontroversial, as indeed it was. In his detailed study of everyday life as depicted in the Ramayana Ananda Guruge writes, “The Aryans of ancient India were not altogether vegetarians. Their diet was a mixed one; they ate fish as was offered to Bharata and his party by Guha. Meat too was consumed quite widely. Not only did Rama say that animals are killed by men for their flesh but he also killed many animals – deer, wild boar, antelope, etc., – for food during his sojourn in the forest. Meat was eaten with relish and a verse which describes a meal of Rama and Sita states, ‘He sat on a rock tempting Sita with meat (saying) this is pure, this is tasty and this is well cooked by fire.’ In Bharadvaja’s hermitage Bharata’s army was supplied with venison, mutton, pork and flesh of the peacock and the snipe Likewise, Kumbhakarna consumed large quantities of venison, beef and pork and drank blood. Although the Vanaras are generally depicted as vegetarians, the Brahmans were actually not. The concept that ‘a purely vegetarian diet is an indication of spiritual progress and an advanced culture’ is a later development in India. Even ascetic Brahmans were not strict vegetarians. Although their usual fare consisted of vegetables, they did not abstain from meat-eating as a principle of either religious or social significance. In fact, Agastya is represented as eating rams and he says, ‘I am able to eat comfortably even one whole ram at a Sraddha ceremony.’ There seems to have been no ban on meat-eating by Brahmans even at the time of Bhavabhuti for his Uttararamacarita depicts Vasistha as eating a tawny calf Further, Valin’s statement specifically mentions the animals whose flesh could be eaten by Brahmans. (The Society of the Ramayana, 1960, p.147-8).

In the chapter on food the Sushruta Samhita (1st– 4th cent CE) recommends all kinds of fish, bird and animal flesh showing that meat eating was commonplace during that period. This and a great deal of other evidence shows that like Buddhists, Hindus were for centuries in two minds about vegetarianism. It was only after the 9th, 10th and 11th centuries that vegetarianism started to become widespread in India.

http://beef.sabhlokcity.com/2013/07/a-buddhists-analysis-of-meat-and-beef-eating-in-ancient-india-by-shravasti-dhammika/

cik_kitty

TuntungReturn replied at 8-10-2015 12:56 AM
elok je india sebelah umah aku mkn lembu. aku tny klo dh mkn lembu cm ne? die ckp nnti pi kuil semba ...

Hahaha...lawaklawaklawak

ultra78

Org hindu di sana minum air kencing lembu kan? Di negara arab pulak org minum air kencing unta

Acong

ultra78 replied at 8-10-2015 12:47 PM
Org hindu di sana minum air kencing lembu kan? Di negara arab pulak org minum air kencing unta

Kt tanah besar china, minum air kencing budak