|
|
dauswq posted on 29-1-2013 09:25 AM 
so far, acting terbaik slps generasi Kajol si dia tu lah..
tu sbb nak pasangkan depa berdua dl ...
haha..entah jadi ke tak..huhu..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kareena Kapoor on the cover of Vogue
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gojesnyaaa Deepdeep  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controversies about me affect me: SRK
Getting involved in controversies is a part and parcel of any celebrity's life, but superstar Shah Rukh Khan says it does affect him personally, though he doesn't let it show in public.
"They all affect me. I am a very educated, sensitive and an extremely private person. So all of them (controversies) extremely sadden, disturb and anger me in the comfort of my house. And what is even more disturbing is that when you go out into the public, you need to behave in a certain way...it is a no win situation," Shah Rukh told IANS in an interview.
The actor says he has not been a very media savvy person and is unaware of what the politically right thing to say is.
"This whole ideology of saying the right thing at the right time and the whole PR activity, I have never done it. I am the most media unsavvy person. I say what I feel and I get into trouble for it," said the 47-year-old.
"I have not learnt to deal with it, but I am a good actor and when I come out in the public I deal with it (controversy). But I don't like it, it is embarrassing, saddening and humiliating," he added.
Though, the actor considers 2012 as a good year as he was a part of legendary filmmaker Yash Chopra's last directorial venture "Jab Tak Hai Jaan" and his team Kolkata Knight Riders won the Indian Premier League, but at the same time, he often found himself in trouble too. His brawl at Wankhede stadium being at the top of the list.
"It was a good year. Like I said I have beaten up people before when they said wrong things. I am extremely sorry to my children for embarrassing them. But as a father, I would do it all over again, if it happens again. My wife often gets angry when I say all these things honestly," he said.
Elaborating on the Wankhede Stadium controversy after the IPL final last May when he got into an argument with a security guard, the actor admited he made a mistake.
"I thought it (the guard) was wrong and I also thought it was more wrong for me to behave like that. Now I surround myself with more security, so that I get more pushed up in my ivory tower and stop being a normal person. That's the way the world wants to see me, so that's how I will be," he said.
The actor will be a part of Times of India Film Awards (TOIFA), which launched this year. Shah Rukh said awards are still very important to him and he feels extremely proud when he receives one.
"I like awards. I am very childlike when it comes to awards. I get very excited with my kids' awards and medals which they get. We display them," he said.
"When we are surrounded by so much fame and controversies, the thing that keeps you going is that there is recognition in this form. At the end of the year you get happy with the awards. Whenever I get an award, I go and keep it in my children's room. It's like a gift and I get excited," he added.
link : http://www.pinkvilla.com/news/bo ... ut-me-affect-me-srk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amik dr bod CI
Kenyataan Shah Rukh hangatkan Konflik India & Pakistan!
MUMBAI - Bintang Bollywood, Shah Rukh Khan bertegas dia 'selamat dan gembira' di India dalam usahanya untuk menamatkan kontroversi berhubung artikel tentang pengalamannya sebagai orang Islam di negara ini.
India mempunyai majoriti penduduk beragama Hindu.
Artikel yang disiarkan dalam majalah Outlook Turning itu dihasilkan oleh pelakon tersebut.
Dalam artikel itu, Shah Rukh mendakwa pemimpin-pemimpin politik menjadikannya sebagai simbol tentang semua perkara buruk dan yang tidak patriotik mengenai orang Islam di India.
Artikel berkenaan mendorong pengasas kumpulan Lashkar-e-Taiba, Hafiz Saeed mempelawa Shah Rukh tinggal di Pakistan jika dia berasa tidak selamat hidup di India.
Kelmarin, Menteri Dalam Negeri Pakistan, Rehman Malik turut campur tangan dengan menggesa India agar melindungi keselamatan Shah Rukh sekali gus mencetuskan bantahan daripada Setiausaha Dalam Negeri India, R. K. Singh.
"Kita berupaya menjaga keselamatan rakyat kita, lebih baik beliau (Rehman) mengambil berat tentang keselamatan warganya (Pakistan)," kata Singh.
Bagi meredakan keadaan, Shah Rukh dalam kenyataan balasnya kepada media kelmarin menegaskan bahawa komennya dalam majalah berkenaan telah disalah tafsir.
"Tiada satu bahagian pun dalam artikel itu yang menyatakan atau membayangkan saya berasa tidak selamat, terganggu atau bermasalah tinggal di India," jelasnya.
"Saya mahu memberitahu kepada mereka yang memberikan nasihat tanpa diminta bahawa kami di India berasa amat selamat dan gembira. Kami memiliki kehidupan demokratik, bebas dan sekular," tambah aktor tersebut.
Shah Rukh yang melonjak popular menerusi filem pecah panggung, Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge sebelum ini pernah menjadi sasaran kecaman parti politik Shiv Sena.
Parti politik Hindu berhaluan kanan itu kerap memainkan sentimen anti-Islam dan anti-Pakistan. - Agensi Last edited by yatt_takez on 31-1-2013 02:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yatt_takez posted on 31-1-2013 01:44 PM
full bideo klip PC - In My City
dah selalu sgt tgk dia miming lam pilem kan...lepas t ...
yup minat...hehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
versi full
Being a Khan
Outlook Turning Points 2013 [Published By The New York Times]srk
I am an actor. Time does not frame my days with as much conviction as images do. Images rule my life. Moments and memories imprint themselves on my being in the form of the snapshots that I weave into my expression. The essence of my art is the ability to create images that resonate with the emotional imagery of those watching them.
I am a Khan. The name itself conjures multiple images in my mind too: a strapping man riding a horse, his reckless hair flowing from beneath a turban tied firm around his head. His ruggedly handsome face marked by weathered lines and a distinctly large nose.
A stereotyped extremist; no dance, no drink, no cigarette tipping off his lips, no monogamy, no blasphemy; a fair, silent face beguiling a violent fury smoldering within. A streak that could even make him blow himself up in the name of his God.
Then there is the image of me being shoved into a back room of a vast American airport named after an American president (another parallel image: of the president being assassinated by a man named lee, not a Muslim thankfully, nor Chinese as some might imagine! I urgently shove the image of the room out of my head).
Some stripping, frisking and many questions later, I am given an explanation (of sorts): `Your name pops up on our system, we are sorry`.
`So am I, ` I think to myself, `Now can I have my underwear back please?` Then, there is the image I most see, the one of me in my own country: being acclaimed as a megastar, adored and glorified, my fans mobbing me with love and apparent adulation. I am a Khan.
I could say I fit into each of these images: I could be a strapping six feet something – ok something minus, about three inches at least, though I don’t know much about horse-riding. A horse once galloped off with me flapping helplessly on it and I have had a `no horse-riding` clause embedded in my contracts ever since.
I am extremely muscular between my ears, I am often told by my kids, and I used to be fair too, but now I have a perpetual tan or as I like to call it ‘olive hue’ – though deep In the recesses of my armpits I can still find the remains of a fairer day.
I am handsome under the right kind of light and I really do have a `distinctly large` nose. It announces my arrival in fact, peeking through the doorway just before I make my megastar entrance. But my nose notwithstanding, my name means nothing to me unless I contextualize it.
Stereotyping and contextualizing is the way of the world we live in: a world in which definition has become central to security. We take comfort in defining phenomena, objects and people – with a limited amount of knowledge and along known parameters. The predictability that naturally arises from these definitions makes us feel secure within our own limitations.
We create little image boxes of our own. One such box has begun to draw its lid tighter and tighter at present. It is the box that contains an image of my religion in millions of minds.
I encounter this tightening of definition every time moderation is required to be publicly expressed by the Muslim community in my country. Whenever there is an act of violence in the name of Islam, I am called upon to air my views on it and dispel the notion that by virtue of being a Muslim, I condone such senseless brutality.
I am one of the voices chosen to represent my community in order to prevent other communities from reacting to all of us as if we were somehow colluding with or responsible for the crimes committed in the name of a religion that we experience entirely differently from the perpetrators of these crimes.
I sometimes become the inadvertent object of political leaders who choose to make me a symbol of all that they think is wrong and unpatriotic about Muslims in india. There have been occasions when I have been accused of bearing allegiance to our neighboring nation rather than my own country – this even though I am an Indian whose father fought for the freedom of India.
Rallies have been held where leaders have exhorted me to leave my home and return to what they refer to as my `original homeland`. Of course, I politely decline each time, citing such pressing reasons as sanitation words at my house preventing me from taking the good shower that’s needed before undertaking such an extensive journey. I don’t know how long this excuse will hold though.
I gave my son and daughter names that could pass for generic (pan-Indian and pan-religious) ones: Aryan and Suhana. The Khan has been bequeathed by me so they can’t really escape it. I pronounce it from my epiglottis when asked by Muslims and throw the Aryan as evidence of their race when non-Muslims enquire.
I imagine this will prevent my offspring from receiving unwarranted eviction orders and random fatwas in the future. It will also keep my two children completely confused.
Sometimes, they ask me what religion they belong to and, like a good Hindi movie hero, I roll my eyes up to the sky and declare philosophically, `You are an Indian first and your religion is humanity`, or sing them an old Hindi film ditty, `Tu Hindu banega na Musalmaan banega – insaan ki aulaad hai insaan banega` set to Gangnam Style.
None of this informs them with any clarity, it just confounds them some more and makes them deeply wary of their father. In the land of the freed, where I have been invited on several occasions to be honored, I have bumped into ideas that put me in a particular context. I have had my fair share of airport delays for instance.
I became so sick of being mistaken for some crazed terrorist who coincidentally carries the same last name as mine that I made a film, subtly titled My name is Khan (and I am not a terrorist) to prove a point.
Ironically, I was interrogated at the airport for hours about my last name when I was going to present the film in America for the first time. I wonder, at times, whether the same treatment is given to everyone whose last name just happens to be McVeigh (as in Timothy)??
I don’t intend to hurt any sentiments, but truth be told, the aggressor and taker of life follows his or her own mind. It has to nothing to do with a name, a place or his/her religion. It is a mind that has its discipline, its own distinction of right from wrong and its own set of ideologies.
In fact, one might say, it has its own `religion`. This religions has nothing to do with the ones that have existed for centuries and been taught in mosques or churches. The call of the azaan or the words of the pope have no bearing on this person’s soul. His soul is driven by the devil. I, for one, refuse to be contextualized by the ignorance of his ilk.
I am a Khan.
I am neither six-feet-tall nor handsome (I am modest though) nor am I a Muslim who looks down on other religions. I have been taught my religion by my six-foot-tall, handsome Pathan ‘Papa’ from Peshawar, where his proud family and mine still resides.
He was a member of the no-violent Pathan movement called Khudai Khidamatgaar and a follower of both Gandhiji and Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, who was also known as the Frontier Gandhi.
My first learning of Islam from him was to respect women and children and to uphold the dignity of every human being. I learnt that the property and decency of others, their points of view, their beliefs, their philosophies and their religions were due as much respect as my own and ought to be accepted with an open mind.
I learnt to believe in the power and benevolence of Allah, and to be gentle and kind to my fellow human beings, to give of myself to those less privileged than me and to live a life full of happiness, joy, laughter and fun without impinging on anybody else’s freedom to live in the same way.
So I am a Khan, but no stereotyped image is factored into my idea of who I am. Instead, the living of my life has enabled me to be deeply touched by the love of millions of Indians. I have felt this love for the last 20 years regardless of the fact that my community is a minority within the population of India.
I have been showered with love across national and cultural boundaries, from Suriname to Japan and Saudi Arabia to Germany, places where they don’t even understand my language. They appreciate what I do for them as an entertainer – that’s all.
My life has led me to understand and imbibe that love is a pure exchange, untempered by definition and unfettered by the narrowness of limiting ideas. If each one of us allowed ourselves the freedom to accept and return love in its purity, we would need no image boxes to hold up the walls of our security.
I believe that I have been blessed with the opportunity to experience the magnitude of such a love, but I also know that its scale is irrelevant. In our own small ways, simply as human beings, we can appreciate each other for how touch our lives and not how our different religions or last names define us.
Beneath the guise of my superstardom, I am an ordinary man. My Islamic stock does not conflict with that of my Hindu wife’s. The only disagreements I have with Gauri concern the color of the walls in our living room and not about the locations of the walls demarcating temples from mosques in India.
We are bringing up a daughter who pirouettes in a leotard and choreographs her own ballets. She sings western songs that confound my sensibilities and aspires to be an actress. She also insists on covering her head when in a Muslim nation that practices this really beautiful and much misunderstood tenet of Islam.
Our son’s linear features proclaim his Pathan pedigree although he carries his own, rather gentle mutations of the warrior gene. He spends all day either pushing people asie at rugby, kicking some butt at Tae Kwon Do or eliminating unknown faces behind anonymous online gaming handles around the world with The Call of Duty video game.
And yet, he firmly admonishes me for getting into a minor scuffle at the cricket stadium in Mumbai last year because some bigot make unsavory remarks about me being a Khan.
The four of us make up a motley representation of the extraordinary acceptance and validation that love can foster when exchanged within the exquisiteness of things that are otherwise defined ordinary.
For I believe, our religion is an extremely personal choice, not a public proclamation of who we are. It’s as person as the spectacles of my father who passed away some 20 years ago. Spectacles that I hold onto as my most prized and personal possession of his memories, teachings and of being a proud Pathan.
I have never compared those with my friends, who have similar possessions of their parents or grandparents. I have never said my father’s spectacles are better than your mother’s saree. So why should we have this comparison in the matter of religion, which is as personal and prized a belief as the memories of your elders.
Why should not the love we share be the last word in defining us instead of the last name? It doesn’t take a superstar to be able to give love, it just takes a heart and as far as I know, there isn’t a force on this earth that can deprive anyone of theirs.
I am a Khan, and that’s what it has meant being one, despite the stereotype images that surround me. To be a Khan has been to be loved and love back – that the promise that virgins wait for me somewhere on the other side.
- Shah Rukh Khan
link : http://canindia.com/2013/01/here ... ng-points-magazine/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shah Rukh Khan tops Forbes India celebrity list
MUMBAI, Jan 26 — Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan tops the first Forbes India Celebrity 100 with annual estimated earnings last year of US$37. 7 million (RM115 million), the magazine said yesterday.
Indian actor Shah Rukh Khan. — AFP pic
In the list — a ranking of the country’s biggest entertainers based on income and popularity — fellow actor Salman Khan came in second with estimated earnings of US$30 million.
In third place was India’s cricket captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni with US$25 million.
“Both Salman Khan and Dhoni are ahead of SRK (Shah Rukh Khan) in terms of popularity and fame,” the magazine said.
“But ‘King Khan’ came out tops courtesy of his earning power, mainly riding on massive income from brand endorsements,” the magazine said, referring to Shah Rukh Khan.
Actor Akshay Kumar came in fourth place while veteran Bollywood legend Amitabh Bachchan came fifth.
The highest-ranked woman on the list was actor Kareena Kapoor in seventh place.
“The list is an attempt to rank the most powerful and the most popular of the players who are at the centre of this sector,” Forbes media and entertainment editor Deepak Ajwani said.
For the wealth estimates, Forbes said it got independent assessments from multiple sources, including talent agencies, film and TV producers, publishers, sports consultants, advertising agencies and celebrity managers.
To track fame, their methods included looking at media and Internet visibility as well as social media followers.
Most on the Indian list were aged between 30 to 50.
The Forbes special edition, which ranks celebrities across eight categories including actors, musicians, models and sportspeople, was due to hit newsstands today. — AFP/Relaxnews
link : http://www.themalaysianinsider.c ... ndia-celebrity-list |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yatt_takez posted on 31-1-2013 01:55 PM
Deepika Padukone's Filmfare covershoot
sangaatttttttttt gojessssssssss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yatt_takez posted on 14-1-2013 02:14 PM
suhana pon ikot gak. bila tgk suhana neh. aku teringat kat shweta kakak abishek. masing2 copy muka b ...
suhana ni rambot dah santek, tp muka belengaih 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 29-1-2013 10:09 AM
