eddom This user has been deleted
|
Yup, i dont agree the ratio is 11:1, i checked the world map before (online), the population ratio is quite balance, is about 1.04 to 1.01 something, not going to be more than 2 man, impossible lah.
ps:/ China had the worst ratio which is 1.09 (man) to 1.04(woman) because of the policy of one family one child. So if this is the worst ratio, where to have 11:1 ??  : Sorry for not able to provide the link, i just read this fews day ago to check for other thing and i didnt save the link.
ps2: http://www.geographyiq.com/ranki ... opulation_top25.htm this is the sex ratio of 25 country in the world where india, china and etc are included
[ Last edited by eddom at 5-7-2006 02:48 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by 13Friday at 7/3/06 11:47 PM
Polygamy is physically bad
one of that bad side is that the family is too big to feed.
Not a very good argument. There are those who practise polygamy with only two kids and two wives. There are those who practise monogamy and have 20 kids. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by eddom at 5-7-2006 02:32 PM
Yup, i dont agree the ratio is 11:1, i checked the world map before (online), the population ratio is quite balance, is about 1.04 to 1.01 something, not going to be more than 2 man, impossible lah ...
Although fewer females than males are born (the ratio is around 1:1.05), due to a longer life expectancy there are only 81 men aged 60 or over for every 100 women, and among the oldest, there are only 53 men for every 100 women. Women have a lower death rate than men, and live on average five years longer. This is due to a combination of factors: genetics (redundant and varied genes present on sex chromosomes in women); sociology (such as not being expected in most countries to perform military service); health-impacting choices (such as suicide or the use of cigarettes and alcohol); the presence of the female hormone estrogen, which has a cardioprotective effect in premenopausal women; and the effect of high levels of androgens in men. Out of the total human population, there are 101.3 men for every 100 women (source: 2001 World Almanac).
Look at the sign...still woman is more than man. Still polygamy is the solution my, dear:ting:. The solution of polygamy not really can be seen today.But as the number of woman increasing,you will finally wake up one day, realized there is nothing to say and nothing wrong about polygamy.
[ Last edited by eastrun at 5-7-2006 04:20 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by BeanDiesel at 5-7-2006 03:38 PM
Not a very good argument. There are those who practise polygamy with only two kids and two wives. There are those who practise monogamy and have 20 kids.
Deduct her/his credit...deduct it...hehe...just kidding:nerd: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everything being equal, having more wives would equate to more children for a man. It is a valid argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 7/5/06 12:30 AM
Everything being equal, having more wives would equate to more children for a man. It is a valid argument.
yes, if the law of biology states that a married woman will definitely produce a constant number of children. that is, if you marry one woman you'll definitely have X number of children, and with n number of wives you'll definitely have nX number of children. but that ain't true. people differ. so, more wives does not necessarily mean more children. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
about what i said before, I know a man who lives in a small flat, married to one lady, and have more than 20 kids. he's so poor, and the kids are not very well nurtured. so, does that mean monogamy too is bad? no. his family planning is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 5-7-2006 04:30 PM
Everything being equal, having more wives would equate to more children for a man. It is a valid argument.
depends on the way people manage themselves... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why need 4 wives if a man can manage his lust? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
polygamy = dragon
|
who want to be a dragon in physical and spiritual context? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 5-7-2006 08:19 PM
Why need 4 wives if a man can manage his lust?
to help some poor women and janda.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by 13Friday at 5-7-2006 10:05 PM
who want to be a dragon in physical and spiritual context?
king kong? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itsmylife This user has been deleted
|
Originally posted by 13Friday at 5-7-2006 10:05 PM
who want to be a dragon in physical and spiritual context?
okay what....at least it is recognised by law and religion instead of just sleeping with women x kahwin. Lepas tu sape susah.......pompuan jugak. Kalau kahwin kite boleh jage dia. :hatdown: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Itsmylife at 5-7-2006 11:47 PM
okay what....at least it is recognised by law and religion instead of just sleeping with women x kahwin. Lepas tu sape susah.......pompuan jugak. Kalau kahwin kite boleh jage dia. :hatdown:
good point...
at least they have been bonded by legal wedlock..
not just one night stand and adultery which is sinful in ALL religion... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itsmylife This user has been deleted
|
Originally posted by juwaini at 5-7-2006 11:50 PM
good point...
at least they have been bonded by legal wedlock..
not just one night stand and adultery which is sinful in ALL religion...
Betulla...at least kite kahwin. the women will be taken care of, my children will be taken care of. kalo x kahwin free ajela. senang all the menkan, x de tanggung jawap :hmm: (nasib baikla aku x berfikiran cam tu) alhamdullillah :pray: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
capital please
Originally posted by juwaini at 5-7-2006 11:00 PM
king kong?
King Kong is the right things- not the animal or muppet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by 13Friday at 6-7-2006 09:34 AM
King Kong is the right things- not the animal or muppet
i thought king kong is either animal... or muppet
in THIS case, BOTH!  lol:lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Debmey at 5-7-2006 11:33 AM
Not true.
The natural female to male birth ratio is 1 female to 1.05 males.
It is in fact more males are born.
So why did allah produce more males? For some women to have more husbands?
u know why ?
because there are too many gay and "auw auw" male nowdays.. :lol
especially in Christianity..
even their priest also gay what
heh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by juwaini at 5-7-2006 10:59 PM
to help some poor women and janda..
Looks like teh more women than men argument fell apart.
Helping poor people does not require to have sex with them. Its a fallacy and stupid excuse for lust in muslims. Not only that, not all the wives are poor or cannot work.
What abt helping poor men? Can a rich woman have multiple husbands then? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 5-7-2006 02:20 PM
Author
