|
View: 5173|Reply: 12
|
Melayu adalah Jew of the East
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Orang Melayu Berasal Dari Etnik Dusun
Satu lagi penemuan saintifik oleh kumpulan penyelidik forensik dan antropologi USM diketuai oleh Dr. Zafarina Zainudin.
Orang Melayu Semenanjung Berasal Dari DUSUN.
ARTIKEL:
Dr Zafarina studies on genetics showed Malay people migrated from Borneo to Sumatera and then to Peninsula Malaysia. I have attached part of her writings below.
“TRACING THE ORIGIN OF THE MALAY RACE THROUGH THE MORPHOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, SOCIO-CULTURAL AND GENETIC ANALYSIS
RESEARCH CENTER :
Human Genome Center , School of Health Sciences and Dental School , USM CURRENT STATUS OF PROJECT: Ongoing ( started : Jan 2005 ) RESEARCHERS: Principle Investigator: Dr. Zafarina Zainuddin Co-researchers: Dr. Zilfalil Alwi, Prof. Abd. Rani Samsudin, Miss Azlina Ahmad, Dr. Bakiah Shaharuddin, Dr. Liza Sharmini Ahmad Tajudin, Mr. Hoh Boon Peng, Mr. Mohamad Ros Sidek, Dr. Nizam Abdullah, Prof. Norazmi Mohd. Nor, Assoc. Prof. Ooi Keat Gin, Panneerchelvam, Dr. Zainul Ahmad Rajion, Prof. Zainul F.Zainuddin
INTRODUCTION:
The Malay race inhabits particularly Peninsular Malaysia and portions of adjacent islands of Southeast Asia (SEA), east coast of Sumatra , coast of Borneo and smaller islands between these areas.
They were traced by anthropological evidence from the north-western part of Yunnan , in China .
The proto-Malays were seafaring people, probably from coastal Borneo who expanded into Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia as a result of trading and seafaring activities.
The present day Malays, called Modern Malays of Peninsular Malaysia and coast of the Malay Archipelago are a mixture of different races.
They were described as deutero-Malays, descendants of the proto-Malays mixed with modern Indians, Thai, Arab and Chinese.
The history and the origin of the Malay race have been the subject of much speculation among scholars.
Since the Malays primarily reside within SEA, particularly Peninsular Malaysia, the prehistoric migrations into these regions must be taken into consideration.
Several hypotheses of the SEA migration pattern have been put forward. Preliminary studies using mitochondrial DNA analyses suggested affinity of the Southern Mongoloid in the Modern Malay population of Peninsular Malaysia (Zafarina, 2004).
The term Melayu or Malay‚ was also associated with the Hindu-Buddhist Srivijaya Empire (7th-13 centuries CE) believed to be located in the South-eastern part of Sumatra .
An Arab text dating around 1000 CE observed that travellers bound for China sailed through the sea of Melayu‚ that can be inferred to mean the Straits of Melaka.
On opposite shores of the Straits of Melaka by the 7th century CE or earlier, there were the domicile areas of the Malays, namely Sumatra and the Malay Peninsular.
OBJECTIVES:
1. To compile the genetic profile of the Malay race.
2. To study the history, social and anthropology of the Malay race.
3. To characterise the craniofacial, dental and ocular features of Malay race.
4. To correlate the genetic profile of the Malay race with their craniofacial, dental and ocular characteristics. 5. To correlate the genetic profile of the Malay race with its history, social and anthropology.
6. To trace the origin of the Malay race by using the genetic profile, anthropology, craniofacial, dental and ocular characteristics.
METHODOLOGY:
The research encompasses four parts of studies: The Historical and Socio-cultural Analysis, the Ocular Morphology Analysis, the Craniofacial Morphology Analysis, and the last major part, the Genetic Analysis.
Various types of genetic markers are used in the study of the genetic components of the population.
These markers are autosomal and Y chromosome STR markers, mtDNA, Human Leucocytes Antigen (HLA) and lastly, the SNP genotyping which will be done using the Microarray 50K genechip system.
EXPECTED OUTCOME:
1. The tracing of the origin and the migration pattern of the Malay race.
2. Establishing USM as a part of the member of Pacific Pan-Asian SNP Initiative (PASNPI) organized by Human Genome Organization (HUGO)”
Dr Zafarina studies is one of the most cnclusive evidence of Borneo origins of the Malay race. They are not called Malay in Borneo, but Dusuns or Dayaks.
Dr Zafarina traced the genetic migration of the Dusunic speaking people of Borneo southwards in Borneo and along the way producing other tribes such as the Lun Bawangs, Bidayuhs, Ibans, etc. The Bidayuhs in turn migrated to Sulawesi and found the Bugis people. When the Dayaks or Dusun reached the southern tip of Borneo, they simply crossed over to Jawa and Sumatera.
Scientist has concluded that the Expres Train theory that the Malay race come from Taiwan were now discredited. Scientist found genes found among Polynesians (Hawaii) were not found among the indigenous Taiwanese. This shows the connection is missing.
Instead the theory goes that the Malay people who migrated from Indo China reached the coast of Borneo where the race and language of the Malayo Polynesian incubated. It was from Borneo that people migrated out to Taiwan, the Philippines and the rest of Insular Southeast Asia and the pacifics and the Indian ocean.
The proto Malays of Borneo were once great seafarers, reaching as far away land as Madagascar. Their migration led them to other Islands brought them to Sumatera, Jawa, Sulawesi, and then to the Pacifics Islands.
Incidently, the Malagasy language in Madagascar is closest to Maanyan language of Barito Kalimantan. But Manyan is closest to Dusun Witu of Barito which is alsmot 80% similar to the Dusun language of the Penampang and Papar Sabah dialect.
Dusun is about 30% similar to modern Malay. We know that modern Malay is only 30% indigenous, the rest were derived from or enriched by Sanskrit (Indian language), Arabs (during Islamic influence) and Chinese.
But the 30% indigenous are almost all similar to Dusun language in terms of sound and meanings. The followings are some Dusun/Malay similarity.
Eg mato for mata, tolingo for telinga, todung for hidung, dilah for lidah, siku for siku, longon for lengan, kulit for kulit, tonsi for isi, raha for darah, tulang for tulang, wulu for bulu, pusod for pusat, tuhat for urat, wotis for betis, etc.
Other words, kayu for kayu, watang for batang, roun for daun, bunga for bunga, tuah for buah, etc
Others, wulan for bulan, watu for batu, tana for tanah, sawat for sawat (as in pesawat), osin for masin, onsom for masam, po’it for pahit, omis for manis, apui for api, matai for mati, pais for pisau, etc.
Others, iso for sa, duo for dua, apat for empat, limo for lima , onom for enam, etc. Others, palanuk for pelanduk, buayo for buaya, lipos for lipas, tikus for tikus, tontolu for telur, ulanut for ular, etc
There are hundreds of words that form the indigenous part of the Malay language.
The dusun origins of modern Malay is something to be researched further. The dusunic speaking people are quite widespread. The Bisaya of Sarawak are dusunic people, also the dusuns of Tutung and Belait Brunei. In Barito, Kalimantan, the several dusunic speakers are related to the dusunic language.
Even the Bajau language and most visayan dialects in the Philippines can be traced to the dusunic langauge.
According to Dr Zafarina, the dusuns produce the Bajau people (interesting). This correspond with the legend among Visayans that they came from Borneo.
It is ironic that the dusuns today are not constitutional Malay though scientific evidence now showed the Borneo origins of the Malay language.
The dusuns who populated Borneo did not find great civilization in Borneo. The credit must be given to their descendents who migrated to Sumatera and eventually became Malays through intermarriage with the more culturally advance Indians to form the seeds of the melayur kingdom.
Today it is true being Malay is a pride to many Malaysians. But the Malaysian Constitutional definition does not make them racially Malays. Officially, the word Malay is a religious identity, not a racial identity.
Ironically, the only other people who defined their ethnic identity in terms of religion are the Jewish people.
Even Arabs recognize Arab Christians as Arabs. But in Malaysia, one has to be a Muslim to be a Malay.
The Malaysian constitutional definition excludes Javanese, Filipinos, and other indigenous in Southeast Asia who are malayo polynesian speakers as Malays because they do not fulfil the constitutinal definition.
The Malaysian definition of a Malay reduced the number of ethnic Malay to just 25 million people wolrd wide.
Thus, the Malay history also started only with the advent of islam in the 14th century. Malay did not exist before the advent of Islam.
The term Malay was popularized by western anthropologists based on their readings of Sejarah Melayu, however, distorted.
The term Malay is now very popular, used even by President Gloria Aroyo to identify her Filipino racial heritage. Unfortunately, may be she did not know, but the Malaysian Malays would have disputed her. She does not fulfill the Malaysian Constitutional definition to be a Malay.
Unless Malaysia change its constitution to make Malay a racial identity for Malayo Polynesian people, then the narrow definition would make the term Malay relevant to a small group of people in a sea of 300 million Austronesian Malayo Polynesian speakers.
As of now, to be a Malay is just like to be a Jew, where ethnicity is defined by religious identity.
http://disebaliklensakamera.blog ... ri-etnik-dusun.html
|
Rate
-
1
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bahalol mana kata Sanskrit asal india ?
Dusun = austronesian primitif
Melayu = austronesian canggih + kaum berbahasa Sanskrit dari semenanjung Anatolia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"They were traced by anthropological evidence from the north-western part of Yunnan , in China .
The proto-Malays were seafaring people, probably from coastal Borneo who expanded into Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia as a result of trading and seafaring activities....."
Statements diatas adalah in sequence. Jadi, mana satukah yg betul? Kerana outcome dari statements sebegini amat penting utk socio-economic bangsa bangsa di Malaysia, dan confidence depa. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by BotakChinPeng at 12-6-2015 12:40 AM
Menurut Stephen Oppenheimer kandungan genetik barat asia dalam mtDNA Melayu Lembah Bujang lebih tinggi dari kaum Rawa (lebih25%).
Perlu diingat bahawa mtDNA diwarisi dari pembawa wanita sahaja.
Dari satu lagi kajian pula lebih separuh genetik barat dalam bangsa melayu adalah dari jenis mediterranean dan bukan jenis selatan asia
Kandungan sanskrit yg paling tinggi pula terdapat dalam bahasa melayu berbanding bahasa lain. Maka sudah tentulah bangsa dan bahasa melayu terbentuk dari gabungan suku Austronesia semenanjung yg ultra canggih dan suku pencipta bahasa Sanskrit dari semenanjung Anatolia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
abah ko 
|
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bodohnya engkau ni.
Kalau nazak tak guna takkan ada la hasilkan teknologi tercanggih di asia tenggara yg mengalahkan banyak negara maju. Takkan ada la syarikat perladangan jatropa terbesar di dunia. Pemilik tender rig terbesar dunia. Dua kilang kereta bersepadu . Syarikat perladangan sawit terbesar dunia. Kontraktor pengeruk ke5 terbesar di dunia. Berpuluh jet airbus , berpuluh helikopter.
Ingat suku sakat Tom Cruise tak ada jadi hamba seks di negara melayu ? Suku sakat Shah rukh khan yg diperdagangkan ke sini...tak payah cerita lah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ptuih. Tak mau la ada kaitan dgn yahudi. Bangsa yg jadi hamba & dipijak kaum lain hampir sepanjang sejarah mereka. Yang jadi tikus makmal eksperimen nazi pun ada. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Betul cakap awak, wahai sayangku, Botakchinpeng.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FYI, she's Puan Botakchinpeng.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oooo
camtu
tapi apasal melatah kuat sangat (melayu je kuat latahnye)
aku ingatkan dia melayu sejati sejak dlm perut mak lagi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 5-6-2015 09:38 PM
变色卡
Post time 6-6-2015 05:13 PM
Author
