|
|
i have all the books in softcopy. just pm me yur emails  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
waahh...wa'ah(how'ja pronounce ur name neway?)
nak nak..........yg latest ader tak?:cak:
[ Last edited by raeshad at 12-12-2005 10:08 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
raeshad. dah antar to yur email.
ada 6 buku smuanya. including the latest book. enjoy! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eyp..thanks a million....
tak expect pn buku 6 ader...cepatnyer..ko amek dr maner? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ada laa
[ Last edited by wa'ah at 13-12-2005 11:08 AM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apa ni...xkan nk simpan sengsorang jer....ke, ko ader kenalan ngan jk rowling ni? he he...:cak::cak::cak: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beli the actual book lagi satisfyling... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of course ler...but it x hurt by having HP in ur laptop aint it? at least...when i'm bored, i can browse thru it..
but i do agree wif u...e-book can nvr replace the real book.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the new movie.. walaupun banyak potong.. maklum ler tebal gile buku no 4 -Harry Potter dan Gelas Berapi tu, aku sukalah.. since the director pick the essential parts in the book and throw it inside the film.. even tho it's hanging in the end.. mmg ler hanging, dalam buku pun camtu gak..
Voldemort is quiet good.. mmg tak handsome dalam cerita tu, padahal kat luar hensem gile Ralph Fiennes tu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
waaah..to me, the movie was ok la...but the ONE THING that i think yg selamatkan betul2 citer tu is - biler Ralph Fiennes kuar - jf Lord Voldemort..waahh..eerie giler...
mmg best...go Ralp Fiennes....:lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The film tak dpt nak portray the 'DARKNESS' and eerieness of Voldemort... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sbb you-know-who tu kua lmbt sgt...
n yes....quite disappointed gak a, memandangkan G.o.Fire's the best book in the series for me.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sebab tu la jugak I wasn't too eager to go to the cinema n watch the film..i love the book itself!!!film tak dpt portray exactly aper yg ader kat buku..so different! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yeap... tapi...i think (takut pula kalu ader fanatif fan LOTR..)it doesn't work with LOTR..he he..i mean, don get me wrong, i LOVEEEE Tolkien's Books....apart from the LOTR itself, i just love The Silmarillion....(and his books are my most prized collections..other than Anne Rice's itself..)
and to me, LOTR's books and movies are two different things....plus the fact that the movie was a a totally different version than the book...but they're both great.....(i mean, i think of them as two different thing...) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raeshad, have u seen the latest Harry Potter moviie? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
starred review from rottentomatoes.com about the 4th film
Ratings for each film based on movie critics:
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 89%
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 88%
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets 82%
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone 79%
REVIEW: HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE
11.17.05
By Devin Faraci
With the fourth film in the series, the Harry Potter films may have set a real record - it's the first franchise where each movie is better than the last one for this long.
A lot of the credit must go to the source material. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was, at the time, the biggest book in the series, and it was the most ambitious by a long shot. JK Rowling opened her world up - while the prior three books had been almost completely set at and about the grounds of Hogwarts, Goblet of Fire gives us our first real look at the rest of the wizarding world with the Quidditch World Cup and the international TriWizard Tournament.
But it isn't just geography that's explored in Goblet of Fire. Rowling moves her characters into adolescence, making the whole book about the end of childhood. Wisely this is what director Mike Newell and longtime adapter Steve Kloves have chosen to focus on, filling the movie with the first stirrings of sexuality - and the first encounters with mortality.
Goblet of Fire is a real achievement as a film in a lot of ways. The book was the toughest adaptation yet, but you don't feel anything missing in the final film. Mike Newell was new to this genre and to the sheer amount of effects, but the movie is effortless and lovely, with a both a charming eye for detail and a vision of grand spectacle.
But the best achievement may be in just how much of a damn good film it is. It's a real competitor for a spot in the list of great coming of age movies. As a Harry Potter film it profits from being the fourth - Newell doesn't need to waste any time on the introduction of characters or the world, and we're plunged headfirst into the story. The responsibility is on you for keeping up with the details - if you don't remember what a polyjuice potion is, no one is taking the time to explain it to you. Don't despair - Newell doesn't let that stuff weigh down the film. He knows that the magic and the monsters are there for color, and not to be the center of attention.
The center of attention is the tribulations our heroes must face as they hit puberty. Harry has no problem summoning up the courage to take on a fire breathing dragon in one of the deadly contests of the TriWizard Tournament, but asking a girl out leaves him frozen in fear. Sex and the complications that come with it are the real Big Bads of the story, although by the end a new Bad joins them - death.
Death is something that has always been present in the Potter series, from the very beginning of Harry's life when his parents were murdered by the evil Lord Voldemort. But death was something that happened to adults, or villains, and the dangers to the kids were minor. Everything would turn out OK. Goblet of Fire upends that. Suddenly the danger is very real, and very immediate. This is the darkest film yet, although it lacks the gothic grace of Alfonso Cuaron's Prisoner of Azkaban. The darkness in Goblet is of a different sort, no longer the darkness where monsters lurk but the darkness that confronts teenagers whose bodies have begun to change and who are slowly becoming aware of their mortality. It's an existential darkness, the one that reminds you that one day you, too, will die.
It sounds like heavy stuff, but Newell has a more natural understanding of the way children behave, and the kids this year are rambunctious and mischievous. Everything is darker, but everything is also more fun. And the magic seems less silly and more majestic, more important. The film is energized, like Newell has turned the knob up another notch.
When the first film was released there was speculation about whether the original kids would stay with the series for all seven movies. Thankfully the decision was made to keep them. While none of them are going to be winning any awards anytime soon, they've all made the roles their own. There's a lack of artifice in the acting, and as a result the relationships and situations feel more genuine.
As for the rest of the cast, it's hard to pick out any one actor. It feels like the adults have a little more to do this time out than in the last film, and it definitely seems like they're having a blast. Maggie Smith appears delighted in many of her scenes, and Ralph Fiennes deftly treads the hammy line as the incredibly creepy looking Voldemort.
Things just get worse for Harry Potter and friends after the events of this film. Is it possible that the franchise can keep bucking the odds and keep getting better? I thought that Prisoner of Azkaban had set a very high bar, but Goblet of Fire easily ups the ante (and without resorting to mixing metaphors, mind you, unlike me). For years I've felt bad for the people who resisted the wonderful universe JK Rowling has created in her novels - maybe this excellent, fantastic film will convince them that Harry Potter isn't just a fad or silly kiddie stories, but a great contribution to the modern imagination.
9 out of 10 |
Rate
-
1
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by KRUfan at 16-12-2005 07:46 AM
Raeshad, have u seen the latest Harry Potter moviie?
of course!!! he he...:clap::clap::clap:have u?
me've seen it, me've seen it... he he. igt nk tgk citer tu maser opening day, x jadi plak....ader klas maser tu...tgk ari ahad the week yg dia kuar..x sbr nk tgk maser tu..kes kes..(who doesn't huh?)
and, today, br nk tgk Narnia....he he....even tho i'm not a particular fan of C.S. Lewis' books - coz they're kinda boring, i'd RILI WANNA WATCH THE MOVIE VERSION.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't seen it, Raeshad! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by KRUfan at 17-12-2005 08:35 AM
I haven't seen it, Raeshad!
then, what are you doing staring ur monitor? go watch it with ur buddy.... ...
and btw, Narnia's (i'm actually at a loss of words...coz i cant rili say the film's great...)but i think it was worth watching......coz i thot they only based it on book 3 - the lion, the witch n the wardrobe...turns out that it's actually bout Chronicles of narnia itself...(patutla xder satu scene pn from that particular BOOK!!!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by KRUfan at 17/12/05 08:35 AM
I haven't seen it, Raeshad!
you better rush to the cinema... it's GOOD!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Category: Belia & Informasi
|
Post time 24-11-2005 11:25 AM
