|
|
33# lkick2113
supaya ia cepat mampus...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37# exocet
2 sebab.
1. Optical jadi back-up utk radar
2. Target recognition. to avoid blue on blue engagements. (remember the damn !@#$%^&* Patriot missile) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
okeh fine kalo camtu...which one better?stand alone CIWS e.g Phalanx or gun-missile CIWS e.g Kashtan? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42# cmf_tin
MEKO 100 design tu dah cukup baik utk jadikan light frigate. Mau besar lagi pakai la design MEKO 200 cam South African navy pakai |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44# exocet
wa suka missile/ gun mix. greater engagement range. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ala ada rezeki ada la lekiu batch II..mana tahu kite angkat terus type 45 tu...dlm news kate UK pun tak mampu nak arm kan kapal tu sebab budget tak cukup...wa ingatkan NGPV kite je konsep FFBNW rupanya UK pun dah ikut jejak langkah m'sia.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
itu sek baik diorang xscrap je Type 45 tu...diorang pon same, sen xde...carrier baru xsilap diorang xcontinue kot...juz continue SSBN je kalo xsalah...
ok back to topic, CIWS ni actually ada yg battle proven x?i mean yg actually intercept cruise missile dlm arm conflict?kalo sape tau sila2 la share... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48# exocet
rasanya takde. masa USS Stark kena bantai dgn Exocet pon, CIWS ni dipadamkan (kenapa yea? ). masa INS Hanit kena bantai dgn Noor pon, CIWS dipadamkan gak.
setaww wa, yg betul2 battle proven in terms of naval anti air engagement adalah Sea Wolf, Sea Dart dgn Standard Missile. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47# guyfawke
ni kes type 45 destroyer ke???? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even Uk yg one of the 5 world power pun x cukup duit nak arm kan T45 ....perasan x UK punye influence (dlm ketenteraan) dah makin mengecil jika dibandingkan semasa empire nya tengah kuat di seluruh dunia.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mana ade lg dah Great Britain...dh collapse pas WWII...abes perang byr hutang blk kat Allied...nak bg mkn org sendiri waktu tu pon tersedak2, apatah lg nk maintain colonies...tu 1 1 merdeka tu...
so bg diorang dh xpractical nk maintain fleet dia besar2...lg 1 org giler je maintain 12 nuclear aircraft carrier (US)...the cost is too great... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52# exocet
Great Britain ni bukan ke gabungan England, scotland, wales & Ireland Utara???? dari gabungan ini la yg dinamakan Great Britain, ye ke???? opss off topic...
Tapi skrg, dia nak buat 2 bijik carrier class queen elizaberth..... displacement 60000t +++ (nuklear powered) dan siap kan remaining daring class (T45)..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53# lkick2113
carrier dorang pun ada problem...tech ngan ongkosnya.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54# guyfawke
dijangka lunch bila???? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54# guyfawke
dijangka lunch bila????
lkick2113 Post at 8-10-2009 10:27 
aku lunch kul 12:30..............  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahha, sempat lagi tuh...member salah taip je kot...hahha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57# jofizo
typing error, loya burok hang no... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55# lkick2113
wa hari ni tak lunch...kawan takde..so makan biskut kering je kat opis.. tapi kalau carrier UK tu tak silap wa nak launch before 2020...itupun kalau takde problem integration..again..macam m'sia lagi...sekurang2nya kite dah jadik trend setter bab2 delay ngan FFBNW dah.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 7-10-2009 06:32 AM
Author
