V13 MH370 - Kena hijack USA (Jacob Rothschild) / Illuminati / Freemason / JEW..?

mysara

Changa posted on 15-3-2014 10:27 PM
Akak lebih reka sembah berhala daripada baca konpirasi teori ini.

membuka minda kpd pelbagai teori, walaupun kita tak setuju
akak nak sembah berhala ke, sembah ratu ke, sembah le kak..hak masing2 khannnnn

matamata

kelana36 posted on 15-3-2014 10:27 PM
sebab, after every insiden.. the flight safety department satu dunia akan kaji punca, bagi recomme ...

Airbus kan ada "anti stall"....ke baru je pasang...?

tinker_bell

kucingkecik posted on 15-3-2014 10:28 PM
kalo x silap ioll dgr kapten nik tu ckp...india punya radar@sistem ketenteraan diorg jgn main2..

sbb tu la yg hijacked ni bkn org biasa..US/russia/china je mampu..sbb teknologi hilang dr radar ni beratus juta/billion..

anyway..siapa2 boleh dpt kn nama2 scientist ni??ioll boleh csi..pensyarah uighur tu..tp nk nama penuh dgn uni..begitu jugak dgn any scientist atas pesawat tu..

munchkin

stania83 posted on 15-3-2014 10:10 PM
haritu ade forumner tulis kapten ni atheist? atas dasar ape dia cakap/fitnah camtuh eh?Jangan marah  ...

Sebab dia like talk show atheist tu.tapi dia sembahyang jumaat gitu.

matamata

kelana36 posted on 15-3-2014 10:27 PM
sebab, after every insiden.. the flight safety department satu dunia akan kaji punca, bagi recomme ...

And yes...diaorg mati2 akan buat prevention agar tak berulang...

kelana36

tinker_bell posted on 15-3-2014 06:23 PM
mgkin radar india dgn pakistan tak dpt kesan??dia boleh hilang dr radar kn??yg radar tudm tu pon h ...

B 777 besar, no way boleh escape.. high terrain area pulak tu, tak boleh nak fly low level belw radar horizon.

makkenits

Cpt la gomen umum status sbenar kes ni.. informer aku asyik frust je setiap kali buat pc tok isam asyik dok sebut benda yg hampir sama.. lg lama top gun coverina, lg payah utk buat damage control nanti... nak tunggu demand, mmg aku rasa xkan ada demand.. sbb kes ni very complicated..

carold

uda posted on 15-3-2014 03:49 PM
Bukan...dia kata kena siasat if ada dikalangan passenger tu pilot MAS yg bercuti. Kalau ada, perlu ...

Ok..tq atas pencerahan

tinker_bell

Knights posted on 15-3-2014 10:28 PM
kalau boleh simpanlah stok barangan makanan banyak banyak

apa apa pun boleh terjadi

kalau perang dkt south east asia ni..commercial flight ada tak tok lari jdk asylum/refugee??ke kena lari pkai tongkang jah??

CikE

Acong posted on 15-3-2014 10:08 PM
baca sini > http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/

Thanks acong...best2

thieo

tinker_bell posted on 15-3-2014 10:30 PM
sbb tu la yg hijacked ni bkn org biasa..US/russia/china je mampu..sbb teknologi hilang dr radar ni ...

kalu boleh hilang dari radar, pasai apa boleh kantui dengan military radar malaysia? dan siap boleh ping ke satelit lagi?

matamata

satriastendet posted on 15-3-2014 10:24 PM
Aku suspek next year Mas catat untung sbb negara2 yg bertelagah ni byr duit penutup mulut yg bykkkkk

So segala "keuntungan" tu nak letak kat bhg mana dlm laporan audit MAS....?..

munchkin

Peya posted on 15-3-2014 10:24 PM
kat bali masa kt imegresen pun lelaki kene bukak kasut. mmg normal procedure.  kt us pak lah kene  ...

Ni kat lcct malaysia. Sebelum ni flight domestik takde pulak dia suruh bukak belt kasut bagai. On 6 th march 2 days before 8 th march

berancuk

monreyes posted on 15-3-2014 10:28 PM
amboi adam...
g la langgar cimb

akak tak suka CIMB clit ke? Tahukah akak bahawa aplikasi Android CIMB clit dengan Maybank2u itu dibina oleh syarikat Melayu yang sama?

NeoMatrix

rosemiy posted on 15-3-2014 10:29 PM
aku rsa aku dgr bnda yang sama dalam berita kat radio source bernama katanye..

mungkin bernama kut ingat2 lupa pulak...terlalu banyak sangat berita tentang  MH370 yg telah aku baca....

Staratila

Yeay semua org selamat laa ye...

geolimarkisa

matamata posted on 15-3-2014 10:24 PM
kapal tu mmg mampu tampung minyak 12 jam..contohnya utk ke London ..tp dlm kes ni kapten takkan is ...

rasanya aku yang post sebab aku dengar kat bernama radio pagi td minyak dia ada untuk 12 jam..aku x sempat catch up siapa yang di wawancara cos masa aku on radio dah start...
tp make sense juga bila di fikirkan kapal terbang tu masih on air begitu lama..rasanya mustahil lah dia berhenti mana2 refuel.. cos refuel pun ambik masa kan??and then nak landing mesti kena mintak permission air traffic controller...mesti dah dapat detect.. ...

Acong

MAILS COMPLETELY CENSORED. PHONES DISCONNECTED. WEB SITE SAVED ONLY BY A HUGELY READ ARTICLE AT BEFOREIT'S NEWS THAT I COULD EDIT TO TELL PEOPLE WHAT HAPPENED WHEN IT VANISHED. BUT WHAT CAN I SAY? READ IT AND WEEP YOU NSA busxxxdS.

March 14 2014
Exploring the theories regarding flight 370

"HERE IS THE ANSWER: CHINESE ENGINEERES WERE KIDNAPPED SO SECRETS COULD BE EXTRACTED BEFORE THE U.S. KICKED OFF WORLD WAR 3. WE ARE LOOKING AT THE RUN UP TO WORLD WAR 3. EVERYONE KNOWS IT'S COMING, AND NOW WE KNOW THE PENTAGON FEARS CHINA MORE THAN RUSSIA."

The following are the most common bogus "theories" surrounding the dissapearance of flight 370, followed by what is obviously the real answer

1. Flight 370 was shot down an hour after it took off by the U.S. navy. This is proven false by the fact that the plane's engines remained logged in to a maintenance monitoring program via satellite uplink for five full hours afterward, and this alone trashes theory 1. Anyone following the story about the guy on the oil rig who claims he saw it go down is out of the loop, that one is completely spurious.

2. A couple of Iranians OR the pilots OR other passengers on the plane switched off the transonder and flew it to wherever - This is proven false by the fact that the plane vanished from active radars and never showed up on radar anywhere again despite having flown through at least one and probably many nation's radars, AND proven by the fact that the plane eventually landed where cell phones could connect and be subsequently rung. IF the plane went to ANYWHERE a cell phone could connect, it flew through active radar to get there, END OF DISCUSSION.




3. The plane kept flying EAST and landed at a secret base in Viet Nam, somwhere in the Phillipines. This is easily proven false by the Malaysian's own military tracking it turning West. I agree that the most probable initial destination for flight 370 was Diego Garcia. But it's repainted now and is probably sitting out in the Mojave desert to be used in a future "terror attack". Anyone in Mojave or Barstow? Heck, EVEN L.A.? Go look for it at that mothballed jet parking lot near the wind farm that is in the city of Mojave. A 777 should not be there.

4. The plane got hit by a missile, the pilots sent a distress call from a shattered cockpit that got picked up by Singapore, and the plane crashed in the ocean - This is easily proven false by the fact that the 777 is a full fly by wire aircraft which turned around and flew a direction opposite it's originally programmed autopilot route, which would not have happened if the cockpit got blown open. That would have disabled the pilots, and the autopilot would not have turned the plane around by itself, it would have simply dead flown the plane to China and automatically landed it. All modern jumbo jets have fully automated take off, fly to destination and land without pilot intervention, but pilots will sometimes opt to land a plane manually to keep in practice. Autopilot alone makes theory 4 improbable and makes electronic hijacking very probable.

5. Almost too ridiculous to mention - Freescale employees cloaked the aircraft and stole it, and / or aliens took it. That theory was good for a joke about how an AWACS antenna looks.

Theory 6 - Awacs type planes can't jam radar or transponders, and once you switch a transponder off, an airplane vanishes from radar FOREVER. This one really pisses me off, and preys on the most stupid people out there who have absolutely zero understanding of the technical side of how things actually work. Do I really need to discuss this? Perhaps on two points. The first, which I have been shilled the most over is the transponder. TRUE, many planes have them. FALSE - ALL PLANES HAVE THEM. FACT: If you took every aircraft flying every jungle every corn field or every weed patch in every place on earth and mixed them in with commercial and/or high class airplanes, the majority of what is out there, the average, would NOT have a transponder. THIS IS MY POINT, ACTIVE RADAR IS TO ALERT LARGER PLANES THAT HILLBILLY CROP DUSTING JOE IS THERE. And active radar works. AND when flight 370 disappeared, it was STILL on AND VANISHED FROM active radar. THAT would NOT be possible absent jamming.

The second point I need to be perfectly clear on (I GUESS) is that jamming is world war 1 type old school. And ALL awacs from day one could jam. It's an essential part of having a jumbo jet do a mission. Awacs planes jam radar to keep even the fighter planes that are along with them safe. That's a cold hard fact. The only reason why fighter planes don't have really good jammers is because they can't have a UFO shaped antenna pod on them and still fly decent. Whatever numbskull out there who insists that Awacs is nothing but a radar platform and that it can't jam is hoping people are so stupid they don't realize that ANY MILITARY SYSTEM THAT HAS A PRIMARY FUNCTION HAS ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS SUPPORTING IT THAT PLAY SUPPORTING FUNCTIONS. AND THE ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS ARE OFTEN VERY CAPABLE ALL BY THEMSELVES AND GET USED EVEN WHEN THE PRIMARY FUNCTION IS NOT BEING USED. Yeah, Awacs is a radar platform. TRUE. BUT THAT ANTENNA POD CAN HOLD ANYTHING, and WHAT better thing could you have to jam a radar system than another radar system that can be custom tailored to spoof radar with the full power of a radar system? The only problem is how many signals you can spoof and send a false response for, which is why flight 370 stayed visible on at least one Malaysian radar system.

NOW LET'S GET TO REALITY AND MOTIVES

FACT: Flight 370 stayed logged into satellites which cannot be jammed without blacking out the whole portion of the world they cover (which would be obvious). True, if you thought of it you could jam the receiver on the jet quite easily, but that won't prevent the jet itself from maintaining an outbound transmission to the satellite, which if jammed would freak out the satellite because you would have to point a jamming signal at the satellite and overwhelm it so badly all the other planes would lose their connections at the same time. If you want your plane theft to be as secret as possible, you can't jam the sattelite.
One thing with the satellite is that it cannot tell where the plane actually is, it will only know it got signal. You would need three separate satellites all logged into the same plane to figure out where the plane was, and Boeing uses only one log in for obvious economic reasons. Boeing cannot find that plane, they can only say it was in fact alive.

FACT: The plane survived and landed somewhere. AND THE NSA KNOWS EXACTLY WHERE BECAUSE THE CELL PHONES RANG AND IT WAS NOT DEAD RINGING BECAUSE ONE PICKED UP. Ditto for the cell carriers, all of them which are no doubt owned by Kikedom and will keep their mouths shut. WE KNOW WHO DID THIS, "FAILURE" TO LOCATE THOSE PHONES PROVES WHO DID THIS WITH A SINGLE FACT.

FACT: The entire arab hijacker meme is so worn out and provably CIA that we know that fake passport story belongs in the trash. Add the faked photos for an additional laugh. Why did they push this line? Just like Awacs, all military systems have multiple purposes. When the military system is in the information spectrum in the form of a psy op, they are going to get as much use out of any situation as they possibly can. So while they waterboard those chinese military experts, probably as a precursor to getting military secrets before the waterboarders and their controllers launch world war 3, they decided it would be useful to try to frame up IRAN and blame the plane's dissapearance on them and use THAT as a reason to start the war they seeked to get an advantage in by kidnapping flight 370 and stealing the Chinese engineers.

FACT: The first thing to go with jamming would be the transponder. Jamming would also keep the pilots from radioing out. Jamming would have a harder time spoofing all radars, and THAT is the part of the plan that did not go perfect, as it would be expected. And I would guess that the plane was taken to a location, most likely Afghanistan, where NO ONE would say a peep about it being there and it would not matter if it was on radar or not.

In fact, once the plane was actually stolen, it would be possible to only jam it's communications, stop spoofing radar, and identify the plane as something else via a fake beacon on the Awacs plane to get it through another nation's radar shield without anyone knowing what it was. THAT is what probably really happened.

And if I was not right about this, why kill my phones? Why take the web site down - a little word on that - Here is what happened - The server did NOT go down. What they did was take the web site off the DNS server any time a request was made for a file that contained text. Pictures still worked, and they kept that part working because thousands of web sites still use the photography section for their background photos and vanishing that portion was not necessary to take the information part of the web site down. They minimized impact. If it was a legitimate site crash, EVERYTHING would have stopped. The fact that photos were still issued proves it all.

SO WHY WOULD I BE CENSORED? HERE IS THE ANSWER: CHINESE ENGINEERES WERE KIDNAPPED SO SECRETS COULD BE EXTRACTED BEFORE THE U.S. KICKED OFF WORLD WAR 3. WE ARE LOOKING AT THE RUN UP TO WORLD WAR 3. EVERYONE KNOWS IT'S COMING, AND NOW WE KNOW THE PENTAGON FEARS CHINA MORE THAN RUSSIA.

______________________________________
GET THIS, IT'S A HOOT!

The engines on flight 377 remained connected to satellites as part of a Boeing maintenance routine, and Boeing has confirmed the aircraft remained flying for five full hours after it “vanished” from radar. Obviously the Malaysian military really did track this plane as they originally stated. Someone forced them to back down, only to have Boeing blow it wide open once and for all. And THIS is probably why the Malaysian military forgot all about how they tracked it to the strait of Malacca. Too late, the genie is OUT OF THE BOTTLE.
THIS RE-CONFIRMS AN AWACS HIJACKING, THEY REMEMBERED TO JAM RADAR AND THE TRANSPONDER, BUT DID NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL DETAILS AND MISSED A HUGE ONE.

berancuk

munchkin posted on 15-3-2014 10:30 PM
Sebab dia like talk show atheist tu.tapi dia sembahyang jumaat gitu.

ramai jah yang sembahyang jumaat tapi masih ragu-ragu dengan kuwujudan tuhan kak

Acong

AWACS HIJACK PROVEN

Permalink http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/awacs.html

There is a lot of new stuff below this, don't miss it!

Malaysian airlines flight 377 has been provably hijacked by an AWACS plane. This is outlined in the updates below.

UPDATE:

The Malaysian military tracked this plane for a full hour with military radar after it "vanished from civilian radar because "the transponders were switched off" (B.S.) radar is radar, it does not need a "transponder" to track a plane and they can eat dog poo. And Awacs would have shut down any transponder for a plane kidnapping anyway, it took no terrorist to do it.

ANYWAY, the plane did a u-turn and was "last spotted" on the other side of Malaysia. They made the mistake of saying it was "flying low" when it was still at 29,500 feet, far higher than needed to show on radar, to deceive people into believing THAT is why it "vanished" from radar. A whole bunch of lies were hatched about how it disappeared from civilian radar because "the transponder was switched off" but RADAR IS RADAR AND ONLY COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE TRANSPONDERS, PRIVATE PLANES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE TRANSPONDERS. Radar is there to prevent private planes that have no transponders from hitting commercial ones among other things, and if radar can see a private plane that has no transponder it certainly can see a huge jumbo jet. So you can take the transponder lies and trash them.

But the plane DID disappear from civilian radar even though military radar tracked it for a now admitted full hour longer.



What could make a plane disappear from civilian radar while at 36,000 feet yet still be visible on military radar? ONE THING, and it looks like a UFO (as some have speculated) only it's attached to a boeing jet - the antenna on a U.S. Air Force AWACS plane. The fact that this missing jet vanished from civilian radar yet remained visible on more robust military radars proves well enough for me that this indeed was an AWACS hijacking, just like we saw on 9/11 where AWACS planes were seen on video observing if not controlling the crashes into the twin towers. Once the plane flew far enough West, Awacs was obviously enough to jam both civilian and military radars, probably because they entered a zone where the angle of both incoming signals allowed for their simultaneous cancellation. That is where the plane finally "vanished" forever, an hour after the "official" vanishing act. The final vanish happened while at 29,500 feet. Though AWACS was originally released as a radar platform there are many variants of awacs type planes now that serve many types of radio oriented missions including jamming and takeover, and they all have the same antenna dome.

In this scenario, we now have: The plane did a u-turn and flew the other way for a now admitted full hour UPDATE: FIVE hours. THAT supports the Awacs story.

Obvious fake photoshopping of "terrorists". THAT supports the Awacs story.

Cell phones still ringing, which would only be possible with a safe landing. THAT supports the Awacs story

Missing black boxes. THAT supports the Awacs story (the plane is obviously intact)

A reason to electronically hijack the airplane - 20 top people from a semiconductor firm that works defense, with employees working for countries that are not allies yet VERY powerful - THAT supports the Awacs story

And the GRAND FINALE: PLANE DISAPPEARS FROM CIVILIAN RADARS WHILE REMAINING VISIBLE ON MILITARY RADARS. THAT supports the Awacs story and pushes it to the forefront of logic like a tsunami on a beach umbrella, if THAT does not raise a few eyebrows people are sleeping.

And I'd have to say the CIA's obvious pushing of B.S. regarding this supports the Awacs story as well; If this plane shows up somewhere in pieces now, it was electronically hijacked by an AWACS plane - the same type seen on 9/11, and the people were offloaded and questioned (engineers probably waterboarded for defense secrets). IF that plane shows up in pieces now it happened last night, not three days ago FINAL ANSWER.

UPDATE: Exact logic sequence for proving the U.S. air force hijacked the Malaysian airlines flight.

1. Absent an awacs type system which can precisely monitor a received signal and spoof a return signal (or phase cancel it) you cannot disappear a non stealth aluminum skinned plane from ANY radar system. After vanishing from civilian radars, it remained on military radars that would work better against AWACS. That pretty much says it all.

2. Iran is an ally of Russia. Russia has Awacs type systems, but would not try to frame up Iran in a terror plot with a fake passport story supported by idiotically faked photos. Russia did not do this.

3. China and Malaysia also have Awacs type systems. Since it was a Malaysian plane flying with Chinese engineers, it is safe to rationalize out that neither China nor Malaysia did this.

4. Though the engineers on the plane also worked with stealth technologies such as Awacs, it takes a huge UFO shaped antenna to make such systems work, and Malaysian passenger jets do not have them as a standard feature. This was not a stunt played by Freescale Semiconductors.

5. Israel wants war with Iran, and the CIA hatching a terror plot with horribly faked photos stands in the evidence pool against the U.S. air force, which is their sex slave.

6. The obvious motive was military, and a real tie in was the fact that the plane disappeared from civilian radar while at full cruising altitude, but not the military radars. In this case the air force had to choose which radar they would spoof with Awacs (there is extreme difficulty with spoofing more than one system simultaneously unless there is a lucky alignment of signals) and they just hoped the military would not catch on. ONE PROBLEM, the Malaysian military was not as inept as the Air Force thought. PLAN FAILURE.

7. The Iranian terror plot fits the logic tree well. Since the photos were obviously faked, WHO WOULD DO THAT? WHO WANTS WAR WITH IRAN? No brainer there.

8. The cell phones are ringing, and the only organization in the world that can say where they are is the NSA. WHY THE SILENCE?

logic sequence output: Because the plane was hijacked electronically by those who keep the NSA funded and the NSA has been told to SHUT UP. If those phones were in lost baggage, the NSA would have said so RIGHT AWAY, and even the airline company would have figured it out by now, found the bags, heard the phones ringing and said, OH, WE KNOW WHY THEY RING. And the phones are not dead ringing as can happen with some american carriers, because on one occasion one of the phones was picked up and hung up without anything being said. But NOPE, NOTHING on this from the NSA, which means those phones are ringing on a runway somewhere, and the NSA knows EXACTLY WHERE. Yet they still support the CIA, which is doing it's best to hatch a B.S. terror plot about a couple Iranians with fake photos and THERE IS YOUR ANSWER, AMERICA HAS THAT PLANE AND IS PROBABLY WATERBOARDING THE FREESCALE ENGINEERS RIGHT NOW, EXTRACTING CHINESE MILITARY SECRETS. If the plane is now "found" in pieces it will mean "they" gave up on the B.S. story line and decided to ditch it somewhere rather than use it on the Petronas towers or the Sears tower.

The hijacking story won't work now that we know the Malaysian military was able to track the plane because a hijacker cannot switch off a radar system 500 miles away and cannot prevent the plane from being found on radar wherever it went to, ONLY AWACS COULD.

UPDATE:

The shills are panicking trying to prop up and support the "transponder" lie. Here is a response I posted to a shill that pretty much says it all:
I don't care WHAT some idiot says to fool people, I myself have been interested in aircraft and usually only the big ones have transponders. To say they all do is a load of crap. And WHO CARES, I clearly stated that the original Awacs was for radar, but that was 30 years ago. Now the Awacs type planes have multiple electronic warfare capabilities, and even among the original jamming was one so basic that only an idiot would overlook it. THE ORIGINAL HAD JAMMERS.

That same A-hole posted to the Beforeitsnews article and he is a damn SHILL.

Tell him to explain how Boeing kept in touch with the plane via the engine maintenence satellite uplink for five full hours and NO ONE KNOWS WHERE IT WENT, NO ONE SAW IT AFTER MALAYSIA LOST IT.

What we have here is a shill, trying to create a straw man and there is none, I clearly stated that it was an electronic hijack and I could care less how it was done, BOTTOM LINE IS THE PLANE VANISHED FROM RADAR, ACTIVE RADAR, FLEW FOR FIVE HOURS AND WAS NOT SEEN ON ANY RADAR AFTER MALAYSIA LOST THEM. ALL NATIONS HAVE OUTWARD LOOKING DEFENSE RADAR, AND FOR THE RECORD, MILITARY AIRCRAFT DO NOT ADVERTISE WHERE THEY ARE WITH "TRANSPONDERS", COUNTRIES HAVE TO FIND THEM AND THE BOEING WOULD HAVE BEEN A FLYING TURKEY ABSENT JAMMING. NO "TERRORIST" HIJACKER COULD HAVE DONE THAT. ONLY AN ELECTRONIC WARFARE TYPE ESCORT COULD.

TELL THE ROTTEN ROTHCHILD BLOWING SHILL TO EXPLAIN THAT.

Here is a better tempered response to a shill:

I am not unaware of the situation with private aircraft. I have seen at least a dozen and NOT A SINGLE ONE had a transponder. Your claim that most private aircraft have transponders is a lie.

There was no "primary" or "secondary" radar. The transponder only identifies the craft that is being reflected on active radar.

I believe you told the most plausible lie people would ever believe, but you forgot something, I am former NSA and can call bullshit on practically anything.

You cannot tell me that the airport did not have primary active radar systems in Malaysia, we are not talking LaPaz Bolivia even, and even La Paz has active radar. Any city in America with a population over 50,000 will have an airport with active radar. You are implying that a 777 jet took off from an airstrip in an advanced country that was laid out on a dirt path intersecting goat trails and therefore had to transmit back to tell the airport where it was. What a load of B.S.

FOR THE RECORD: THE PLANE VANISHED FROM ACTIVE AIRPORT RADAR. THE FACT THAT THE TRANSPONDER SWITCHED OFF AT THE SAME TIME IT VANISHED FROM ACTIVE AIRPORT RADAR PROVES AWACS EVEN MORE, I KNOW YOU WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT AWACS CAN'T JAM A TRANSPONDER BECAUSE YOU PROBABLY WORK DEFENSE YOURSELF BUT TRUTH BE TOLD, THAT OUTCOME IS AN OBVIOUS ONE and to the other shills, AWACS type planes have many functions and one of them is JAMMING EVERYTHING. AWACS planes have amazing signal jamming capabilities, this is so well established fact that you are going to have to shill even Pakistani agricultural web sites to front the lie that AWACS is not used for jamming. Give up on that one, even goat herders are not that stupid.


Blockbuster UPDATE:



BLOCKBUSTER UPDATE: FAKE PASSPORT GUYS WERE PHOTOSHOPPED. Take a look at their legs. HA HA HA - that's a bad screw up. Here is the original article this picture appeared in, Needless to say, I preserved this one.

Caption below original photo: "A Malaysian police official displays photographs of the two men who boarded the Malaysia Airlines MH370 flight using stolen European passports to the media at a hotel near Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Sepang on March 11, 2014. -- PHOTO: AFP" Now that's an absolute LAUGH. That's as bad as the blood spatters going the wrong way at the bat man shooting.

Get while the getting is good, they are going to "fix this" ASAP.

Too late, this entire article including comments below is now preserved and will post tomorrow in it's full glory on this web site so you can just save it as a Jpeg tomorrow. That way the black hole of censorship won't suck this one beyond the event horizon.

UPDATE:

Here is a post worthy mail that is completely un verified. Discern for yourself. I have my doubts, but people should probably get onto this one anyway.

Someone just sent me this – I don’t know the source so I can’t link it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rothschild, Freescale, Patent, Murder and a missing plane, what do all have in common? Jacob Rothschild, Murderer This is how the elites get richer and richer, by any means available including murder. This is a story about greed, wealth, power and world domination. Have you pieced together the puzzle of missing flight 370 to Beijing China ?? If not, here are your missing pieces. Patents Patents Patents and the wealth they bring.

[link to http://www.4-traders.com

Four days after a missing flight, a patent is approved by the Patent Office for maximizing dies on a wafer. 4 of the 5 Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX. Patent is divided up on 20% increments to 5 holders. Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%) Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%) Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%) Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%) Freescale Semiconductor (20%) If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased if not disputed in a will. If 4 of the 5 dies, then the remaining 1 Patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent. That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor.

Who owns Freescale Semiconductor ?? Jacob Rothschild through Blackstone who owns Freescale. Here is your motive for the missing Beijing plane. As all 4 Chinese members of the Patent were passengers on the missing plane. Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally by passing wealth to their heirs. However, they cannot do so until the Patent is approved. So when the plane went missing, the patent had not been approved. Thus, Rothschild gets 100% of Patent once Patent holders declared deceased. Rothschild, you are an evil busxxxd

My comment:

A little semiconductor manufacturing background -

Chips are made 100 or so at a time on a wafer of silicon. Each individual area a chip is made within is called a die. Silicon suitable for advanced chips is very expensive. To maximize dies on a wafer means that a way was discovered and patented to get more chips out of a wafer, and anything additional is pure profit. SO it would have been a money making patent. I think the above is something to consider, but I don't think that is all there is to this story.

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/