CariDotMy

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

Author: Presiden_Lanun

[Dunia] V16: MH370- SKALA OPERASI SAR SEMAKIN BESAR MELIBATKAN BYK NEGARA

 Close [Copy link]
Post time 20-3-2014 09:35 AM | Show all posts
gogo2 posted on 20-3-2014 09:26 AM
bodohnya ko... kalau al-Qaeda pernah langgar KLCC, mmg USA akan jaga udara kerana amik iktibar.

...

lu bodoh

pegawai pemantau radar TUDM
bukan tanggungjawab utamanya
mengikuti waypoint semua pesawat awam
yang besar jumlahnya dalam ruang
udara yang sibuk

itu tugas radar awam di bawah DCA

lu pergi tengok kat KLIA pun boleh tahu
betapa banyaknya penerbangan komersial,
baik pesawat membawa penumpang atau kargo,
bersimpang siur
dalam selang masa yang amat singkat, setiap hari

tujuh hari seminggu, 365 hari setahun

Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 20-3-2014 09:35 AM | Show all posts
d'zeck posted on 20-3-2014 01:23 AM
AS bimbang jugak
kemungkinan kalau2 pesawat 777 tu disorok dulu
di mana2

ok boleh hadam teori tu
sbb us nak jaga sovereignity dia

tp aku rasa depa datang sebab anwar lah bukan sbb hubungan diplomatik negara yang mantap tu..
tp sebab anwar world agent la..

sedap2 je u nk claim yg x baik kat dia..yg baik semua jatuh kt org laen

thats another way of thinking lah
hehehe
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:35 AM | Show all posts

Published: Thursday March 20, 2014 MYT 12:00:00 AM
Updated: Thursday March 20, 2014 MYT 8:05:40 AM

Daughter of missing chief steward receives touching tweet from Liverpool FC


   


Email








Facebook


82








PETALING JAYA: British Premier League side Liverpool has sent a message to the daughter of MH370’s chief steward Andrew Nari, telling her that she would never walk alone.
“Just to let you know that we are thinking of your father and all those still missing from flight #MH370 Be strong. YNWA,” the club tweeted to Maira Elizabeth Nari.
Maira had sent out a tweet on Sunday, saying: “Daddy, Liverpool is winning the game. Come home, so you can watch the game! You never miss watching the game. It’s your very first time.”
The post was retweeted by thousands of fans before the club picked it up and put it on their website.
Her tweet referred to Liverpool’s 3-0 win over rivals Manchester United at Old Trafford.
Andrew is said to be a staunch Liverpool supporter.
Fans of the club – as well as other football clubs – also tweeted their support for Maira.
Jay N Aie Schiller said this was a time for everybody to hold hands and not walk alone.
“I can assure you too that there are probably a few Manchester United supporters on the flight as well as Chelsea, Arsenal ... Asia is just as crazy about football as Europe/South America.
“May all of you never walk alone regardless of the outcome of this incident and you are heavy on our thoughts, YNWA,” he said.
Norwegian Inge-Martin Eikemo said he would pray for all those on board flight MH370.
“I am a Liverpool fan myself and have two daughters and never miss a game.
“So this touches my heart deeply,” he said.
Smart Chuks said he had never been this touched by any post before, and hoped that her dad would find his way home soon.
Bayar Tarik Fattah said Maira’s tweet was absolutely heartbreaking to read.
“I can’t imagine anything worse than not being able to see your dad.
“This really touches my heart because I always watch football with my daddy,” she said.
Richard Finnigan tweeted: “From everyone living in England and Liverpool, we are all thinking of you. You will never walk alone and hope is never lost. YNWA.”
The tweet was also posted on the official Liverpool FC Facebook page, and has been shared 7,000 times.






Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:35 AM | Show all posts
gogo2 posted on 20-3-2014 09:26 AM
bodohnya ko... kalau al-Qaeda pernah langgar KLCC, mmg USA akan jaga udara kerana amik iktibar.

...

teori al-qaeda langgar wtc tu mengarut. even ramai rakyat amrika pun x percaya. logik akal mana ketebang boleh berlegar2 kat ruang udara tu tanpa jet pejuang dtg. org bodoh je percaya al-qaeda langgar
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:36 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Kapten ne suspek utama ... Lagian beliau buang data log kt sim tu ... Lagi la terbukti beliau salah ... Anak isteri pun dah lari.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:36 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Bell posted on 20-3-2014 09:34 AM
Jihad sebab bunuh rakyat Malaysia....

Yela kot ... Atas nama Tuhan !!
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 20-3-2014 09:37 AM | Show all posts
dino posted on 20-3-2014 09:29 AM
ni speku je ni... klau kapten tu stuju utk bersubahat... since diyakini.... najib bakal kecundang. ...

USA mengkehendaki Anwar Ibrahim

♫...negara berkehendakkan kamu...♫
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:37 AM | Show all posts
Bell posted on 20-3-2014 09:33 AM
Terrorist bom diri sendiri kerana nak balas dendam, nak zahirkan perjuangan mereka. Musuh mereka a ...

Ai ckp Twin Tower USA lah... adoi!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tapi klu ko nak tanya, KLCC manyak kapir sopping...
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 20-3-2014 09:38 AM | Show all posts
d'zeck posted on 20-3-2014 09:35 AM
lu bodoh

pegawai pemantau radar TUDM

berapa byk jet kat Msia pun kena pantau. Lu ingat TUDM goyang kaki kah?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:39 AM | Show all posts
d'zeck posted on 20-3-2014 01:35 AM
lu bodoh

pegawai pemantau radar TUDM

sori menyampuk

kalu tudm ada high index of suspicion sbb flight tu deviate from original path mesti kes ni x terjadi..

tp ye lah,diorg ingat burung2 ..sbb tu x scramble
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:39 AM | Show all posts
gogo2 posted on 20-3-2014 09:38 AM
berapa byk jet kat Msia pun kena pantau. Lu ingat TUDM goyang kaki kah?

bgs2 start mara2 kasi ajar tu olang...tulis tak pakai akal gamaknye..teori sesedap rs jer
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:40 AM | Show all posts
revolusi_30 posted on 20-3-2014 09:36 AM
Kapten ne suspek utama ... Lagian beliau buang data log kt sim tu ... Lagi la terbukti beliau salah  ...

Buang data log ada lah biasa bagi pengamal IT due to limited capasity...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:40 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
kelana36 posted on 20-3-2014 09:08 AM
Baca la kat sini pasal kenapa RMAF tak scramble fighter jet to intercept MH370..
Lepas tu nilai sen ...

Thanks bro...really help ..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:40 AM | Show all posts
gogo2 posted on 20-3-2014 09:37 AM
Ai ckp Twin Tower USA lah... adoi!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tapi klu ko nak tanya, KLCC manyak kapir sopping ...

kamu ini mengingatkan akak kepada tentera Yisrael yang pprt sebentar ingat KLCC itu Gaza mall

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:41 AM | Show all posts
saya baca artikel ni.... mcm boleh dipercayai jugak sebab US banyak main wayang

AWACS HIJACK PROVEN
UPDATED MARCH 13 2014
Malaysian military BACKED DOWN, BUT
GET THIS, IT’S A HOOT! – The engines remained connected to satellites as part of a Boeing maintenance routine, and Boeing has confirmed the aircraft remained flying for five full hours after it “vanished” from radar.  Obviously the Malaysian military really did track this plane as they originally stated.  Someone forced them to back down, only to have Boeing blow it wide open once and for all.
THIS RE-CONFIRMS AN AWACS HIJACKING, THEY REMEMBERED TO JAM RADAR AND THE TRANSPONDER, BUT DID NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ALL DETAILS AND MISSED A HUGE ONE.
THE ORIGINAL POST FOLLOWS:
From http://www.jimstonefreelance.com
Malaysian airlines flight 377 has been provably hijacked by an AWACS plane. This is outlined in the updates below.
The Malaysian military tracked this plane for a full hour with military radar after it “vanished from civilian radar because “the transponders were switched off” (B.S.) radar is radar, it does not need a “transponder” to track a plane. And Awacs would have shut down any transponder for a plane kidnapping anyway, it took no terrorist to do it.   Radar is there to prevent private planes which have no transponders from hitting commercial ones among other things, and if radar can see a private plane that has no transponder it certainly can see a huge jumbo jet. So you can take the transponder lies and trash them.
But the plane DID disappear from civilian radar even though military radar tracked it for a now admitted full hour longer. Only an AWACS type system could do this.  When I refer to Awacs in this context, it means any plane that looks like this, and they have multiple purposes, not only radar.
What could make a plane disappear from civilian radar while at 36,000 feet yet still be visible on military radar? ONE THING, and it looks like a UFO (as some have speculated) only it’s attached to a boeing jet – the antenna on a U.S. Air Force AWACS plane. The fact that this missing jet vanished from civilian radar yet remained visible on more robust military radars proves well enough for me that this indeed was an AWACS hijacking, just like we saw on 9/11 where AWACS planes were seen on video observing if not controlling the crashes into the twin towers. Once the plane flew far enough West, Awacs was obviously enough to jam both civilian and military radars, probably because they entered a zone where the angle of both incoming signals allowed for their simultaneous cancellation. That is where the plane finally “vanished” forever, an hour after the “official” vanishing act. The final vanish happened while at 29,500 feet.
In this scenario, we now have: The plane did a u-turn and flew the other way for a now admitted full hour. THAT supports the Awacs story.
Obvious fake photoshopping of “terrorists”. THAT supports the Awacs story.
Cell phones still ringing, which would only be possible with a safe landing. THAT supports the Awacs story
Missing black boxes. THAT supports the Awacs story (the plane is obviously intact)
A reason to electronically hijack the airplane – 20 top people from a semiconductor firm that works defense, with employees working for countries that are not allies yet VERY powerful – THAT supports the Awacs story

And the GRAND FINALE: PLANE DISAPPEARS FROM CIVILIAN RADARS WHILE REMAINING VISIBLE ON MILITARY RADARS. THAT supports the Awacs story and pushes it to the forefront of logic like a tsunami on a beach umbrella, if THAT does not raise a few eyebrows people are sleeping.
And I’d have to say the CIA’s obvious pushing of B.S. regarding this supports the Awacs story as well; If this plane shows up somewhere in pieces now, it was electronically hijacked by an AWACS plane – the same type seen on 9/11, and the people were offloaded and questioned (engineers probably waterboarded for defense secrets). IF that plane shows up in pieces now it happened last night, not three days ago FINAL ANSWER.
UPDATE: Exact logic sequence for proving the U.S. air force hijacked the Malaysian airlines flight.
1. Absent an awacs type system which can precisely monitor a received signal and spoof a return signal (or phase cancel it) you cannot disappear a non stealth aluminum skinned plane from ANY radar system. After vanishing from civilian radars, it remained on military radars that would work better against AWACS. That pretty much says it all.
2. Iran is an ally of Russia. Russia has Awacs type systems, but would not try to frame up Iran in a terror plot with a fake passport story supported by idiotically faked photos. Russia did not do this.
3. China and Malaysia also have Awacs type systems. Since it was a Malaysian plane flying with Chinese engineers, it is safe to rationalize out that neither China nor Malaysia did this.
4. Though the engineers on the plane also worked with stealth technologies such as Awacs, it takes a huge UFO shaped antenna to make such systems work, and Malaysian passenger jets do not have them as a standard feature. This was not a stunt played by Freescale Semiconductors.
5. Israel wants war with Iran, and the CIA hatching a terror plot with horribly faked photos stands in the evidence pool against the U.S. air force, which is their sex slave.
6. The obvious motive was military, and a real tie in was the fact that the plane disappeared from civilian radar while at full cruising altitude, but not the military radars. In this case the air force had to choose which radar they would spoof with Awacs (there is extreme difficulty with spoofing more than one system simultaneously unless there is a lucky alignment of signals) and they just hoped the military would not catch on. ONE PROBLEM, the Malaysian military was not as inept as the Air Force thought. PLAN FAILURE.
7. The Iranian terror plot fits the logic tree well. Since the photos were obviously faked, WHO WOULD DO THAT? WHO WANTS WAR WITH IRAN? No brainer there.
8. The cell phones are ringing, and the only organization in the world that can say where they are is the NSA. WHY THE SILENCE?
logic sequence output: Because the plane was hijacked electronically by those who keep the NSA funded and the NSA has been told to SHUT UP. If those phones were in lost baggage, the NSA would have said so RIGHT AWAY, and even the airline company would have figured it out by now, found the bags, heard the phones ringing and said, OH, WE KNOW WHY THEY RING. And the phones are not dead ringing as can happen with some american carriers, because on one occasion one of the phones was picked up and hung up without anything being said. But NOPE, NOTHING on this from the NSA, which means those phones are ringing on a runway somewhere, and the NSA knows EXACTLY WHERE. Yet they still support the CIA, which is doing it’s best to hatch a B.S. terror plot about a couple Iranians with fake photos and THERE IS YOUR ANSWER, AMERICA HAS THAT PLANE AND IS PROBABLY WATERBOARDING THE FREESCALE ENGINEERS RIGHT NOW, EXTRACTING CHINESE MILITARY SECRETS. If the plane is now “found” in pieces it will mean “they” gave up on the B.S. story line and decided to ditch it somewhere rather than use it on the Petronas towers or the Sears tower.
The hijacking story won’t work now that we know the Malaysian military was able to track the plane because a hijacker cannot switch off a radar system 500 miles away and cannot prevent the plane from being found on radar wherever it went to, ONLY AWACS COULD.
The shills are panicking trying to prop up and support the “transponder” lie.  Here is a response I told a friend to post to facebook that a shill hit that pretty much says it all:
“I don’t care WHAT some idiot says to fool people, I myself have been interested in aircraft and usually only the big ones have transponders. To say they all do is a load of B.S.  I have also clearly stated that the original Awacs was for radar, but that was 30 years ago. Now the Awacs type planes have multiple electronic warfare capabilities, and even among the original AWACS jamming was one so basic that only an idiot would overlook it. THE ORIGINAL HAD JAMMERS.
That same guy posted to the Beforeitsnews article and he is an obvious SHILL.  Tell him to explain how Boeing kept in touch with the plane via the engine maintenence satellite uplink for five full hours and NO ONE KNOWS WHERE IT WENT, NO ONE SAW IT ON RADAR ANYWHERE AFTER MALAYSIA LOST IT.
What we have here is a shill, trying to create a straw man and there is none, I clearly stated that it was an electronic hijack and I could care less how it was done, BOTTOM LINE IS THE PLANE VANISHED FROM RADAR, ACTIVE RADAR, FLEW FOR FIVE HOURS AND WAS NOT SEEN ON ANY RADAR AFTER MALAYSIA LOST THEM.  ALL NATIONS HAVE OUTWARD LOOKING DEFENSE RADAR, AND FOR THE RECORD, MILITARY AIRCRAFT DO NOT ADVERTISE WHERE THEY ARE WITH “TRANSPONDERS”, COUNTRIES HAVE TO FIND THEM AND THE BOEING WOULD HAVE BEEN A FLYING TURKEY ABSENT JAMMING.  NO TERRORIST HIJACKER COULD HAVE DONE THAT.
Blockbuster UPDATE:
BLOCKBUSTER UPDATE: FAKE PASSPORT GUYS WERE PHOTOSHOPPED. Take a look at their legs. HA HA HA – that’s a bad screw up. Here is the original article this picture appeared in, Needless to say, I preserved this one.
Caption below original photo: “A Malaysian police official displays photographs of the two men who boarded the Malaysia Airlines MH370 flight using stolen European passports to the media at a hotel near Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Sepang on March 11, 2014. — PHOTO: AFP” Now that’s an absolute LAUGH. That’s as bad as the blood spatters going the wrong way at the bat man shooting.
Get while the getting is good, they are going to “fix this” ASAP.
Too late, this entire article including comments below is now preserved and will post tomorrow in it’s full glory on this web site so you can just save it as a Jpeg tomorrow. That way the black hole of censorship won’t suck this one beyond the event horizon.

sumber: http://beforeitsnews.com/alterna ... -awacs-2916516.html
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:41 AM | Show all posts
NIXAR posted on 20-3-2014 09:35 AM
teori al-qaeda langgar wtc tu mengarut. even ramai rakyat amrika pun x percaya. logik akal mana ke ...

Betul kata kamu. Ini semua perancangan George Bush utk serang Afghanistan. Jadi George Bush kena pasang bom kat WTC di setiap tingkat. Pastu bunuh lebih kurang 3,000 rakyat USA.

Sebenarnya WTC sebelum kejadian disahkan pembinaannya tidak mengikut peraturan dan mungkin ada masalah kestabilan. Jadi USA ambil kesempatan ni utk meruntuhkan WTC dgn 3,000 pekerja di dalamnya.


Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 20-3-2014 09:42 AM | Show all posts
gogo2 posted on 20-3-2014 09:32 AM
ko baca blog yg kelana76 tepek. Mmg dia ckp TUDM taw sebab MAS bagi kat TUDM masa MH370 terbang.
...

TUDM mungkin fikir MAS arah MH370 patah balik. Lagipun MAS bukan declare MH370 hilang pada saat ianya membuat turn-back. Pukul 2.40am baru MAS declare hilang. At 2.40am, MH370 sudah berada di waypoint IGREX. IGREX dah di sempadan ruang udara India, Indonesia. Kalau scramble jet pun tak sempat kejar. TUDM mana boleh masuk ruang udara lain.

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:42 AM | Show all posts
gogo2 posted on 20-3-2014 09:37 AM
Ai ckp Twin Tower USA lah... adoi!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tapi klu ko nak tanya, KLCC manyak kapir sopping ...

tp manyak muslim nak p semayang  esp hari jumaat...sebab dekat ngan masjid
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:42 AM | Show all posts
ada sorang pilot pengalaman 35 tahun komen macam ni:

I have been a private pilot for 35 years. Here are a couple of things non-pilots might not know about radar.

There is ‘primary’ radar and there is ‘secondary’ radar. Primary radar consists of echos passively reflected from an object (in this case an aircraft). A burst of UHF RF is transmitted by a radar facility, bounces off any aircraft that it is pointed to, and the echo is received back at the radar facility. The time it takes the echo to return determines the distance to the aircraft. The direction the radar antenna was pointed determines direction to the aircraft. There is generally no altitude determined.

Secondary radar is a completely different thing. Secondary radar is accomplished by an active transmission from an aircraft. A radar facility transmits a request for aircraft to identify. A transponder on the aircraft responds with the aircraft’s assigned 4-digit octal ‘squawk’ code, usually its altitude, and sometimes other information determining on the capabilities of the transponder. Computers at the radar facility pair primary echoes with secondary responses.

Virtually ALL aircraft have transponders. Yes, even virtually all private aircraft.

In the case of MH370 – The reported loss of secondary radar response, while primary response continued, is very significant. It suggests that somebody, or something, switched off the transponder and continued flying the airplane which was seen for a while longer by primary radar. That’s really odd.

A hijacking comes to mind, either by onboard and aircraft-knowledgeable people or by electronics. There is a specific ‘squawk’ code that a pilot dials into a transponder to silently tell ATC facilities that the aircraft has been hijacked. Since that reportedly did not happen, if the airplane was hijacked then whoever or whatever hijacked it knew enough to turn off the transponder.

Could the airplane have been hijacked by a someone not on board, by electronics? Absolutely yes. Most Boeing 757, 767, 777, and 787 aircraft are wired to be controlled from the ground in the event of a hijacking. (I won’t comment here on the implications for 9/11.)

Hijacked by an AWACs, or from the ground, or from a ship? Possible.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 20-3-2014 09:43 AM | Show all posts
berancuk posted on 20-3-2014 09:40 AM
kamu ini mengingatkan akak kepada tentera Yisrael yang pprt sebentar ingat KLCC itu Gaza mall :lol ...

israel pprt cam papagomo
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT


Forum Hot Topic

 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

3-12-2024 07:22 AM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.078309 second(s), 29 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list