Bodoh tak dapat diajar... Makanan sunnah konon

Reborn_Atheist · Post time 21-10-2016 01:19 AM

Edited by Reborn_Atheist at 20-10-2016 05:20 PM

Ayza Gürsoy feeling angry.
17 October at 16:12 · Denizli, Turkey ·

Beberapa hari lepas ada beberapa orang mesej saya, bertanyakan tentang makanan-makanan sunnah yang ada di Turki, saya pun bertanya semula apakah yang dimaksudkan. Mereka pun sebutlah tentang madu, minyak zaitun, buah delima dan lain-lain lagi.

Mereka juga sarankan saya mengkonsumsi makanan sunnah supaya lebih sihat.

Saya jawab, "Di Turki, setiap pagi kami makan buah zaitun, tomato segar, madu, cheese dan lain-lain lagi. Minyak zaitun ini memang diguna harian dalam masakan. Jus delima yang pekat itu pula memang biasa dimasukkan dalam salata (salad). Cuka anggur, cuka epal... Bla bla bla..."

Jika hendak dikirakan, semua itu saya dapatkan ditempat orang memprosesnya sendiri, jadi lebih asli. Tetapi seasli dan se-original mana pun makanan sunnah ini, tidak pula saya lihat hospital di Turki ini kosong dan tiada orang sakit. Saya tidak faham mentaliti orang kita yang semuanya menggunakan 'sunnah' bagi melariskan produk makanan kesihatan.

Tempohari pulang ke Malaysia, saya sempat melihat produk yang katanya dalam madu sudah dibacakan ayat Al-Qur'an (khatam), dalam minyak urut pun sudah dibacakan ayat Al-Qur'an dan tak boleh langkah, masa sapu kena selawat berkali-kali agar lebih berkesan, kismis untuk anak cerdik (pun sudah dikhatamkan) dan banyak lagi. Harga pula mahal.

Jika habbatussauda' itu bukan main lagi besar ceritanya, walhal di Turki memang biasa biji habbatussauda' itu kita taburkan atas makanan atau dimakan begitu saja dengan madu. Tak heboh mana pun. Dan orang di Turki ini tetap sakit, doktor tetap ramai dan fakulti perubatan saban tahun penuh dengan pelajar-pelajar baru yang hendak belajar medik, sebab kadar orang sakit bertambah setiap masa (walaupun hari-hari makan makanan 'sunnah').

Jadi di mana praktikaliti atau kewajarannya ya? Penyakit tetap datang walaupun makan makanan sunnah. Memperdaya masyarakat dengan fakta yang kurang tepat dan berbohong atas nama 'sunnah' itu sangat-sangatlah tidak beretika perniagaannya.

Dan kita, janganlah lekas benar terpengaruh dan percaya.

Mengomel jam 11.11 pagi,
-Ayza Gürsoy
20085 Denizli, Turkey

https://www.facebook.com/AyzaGursoy/posts/10154090290793261

Reborn_Atheist · Post time 21-10-2016 01:39 AM

harap tiada lobai kepam yg terhina ke hulu hilir pasal kismis minda tak laku

mbhcsf · Post time 21-10-2016 05:16 AM

Edited by mbhcsf at 21-10-2016 05:47 AM

kenapa awak tak highlight implikasi judi, arak , zina dan alcohol?
hmm...ternyata jelas benda benda tersebut menyebabkan addiction / ketagihan dan sememangnya telah terbukti pun dalam otak manusia yg reward centre atau pusat otak yg sensitif pada pleaisre cues akan mudah teraruh dengan bebenda di atas.

_______________________________________________________________________

Alcohol 'more damaging than heroin' says Prof David Nutt

Image caption[size=0.8125]Professor David Nutt was sacked as UK chief drugs adviser in October 2009

The government's former drugs adviser, Prof David Nutt, believes alcohol is damaging society more than heroin.

In one report he ranked 20 drugs based on their effects on users and society and said tobacco and cocaine were equally harmful, while ecstasy and LSD, were among the least damaging.

In 2009 he was sacked after disagreeing with the government's decision to re-classify cannabis.

Prof Nutt will be speaking at the Manx Museum Theatre on 28 April.

He added: "In Britain today, alcohol is a leading cause of death in men between the ages of sixteen and fifty, so it is therefore the most harmful drug there is in terms of life expectancy, family disruption and road traffic accidents.

"It all boils down to the question of what are we trying to do when we make drugs illegal - we should be trying to reduce harm for people but in order to decide on whether to make something illegal we need to have a good appreciation of what relative harms are."

His aim, he said, was "to understand what the right approach should be, based on the science and evidence".

Prof Nutt is the Edmund J Safra Professor of Neuropsychopharmacology and Head of the Department of Neuropsychopharmacology and Molecular Imaging at Imperial College London.

-

mbhcsf · Post time 21-10-2016 05:17 AM

Alcohol 'more harmful than heroin' says Prof David Nutt
1 November 2010
From the section UK
Share
Jump media playerMedia player helpOut of media player. Press enter to return or tab to continue.
Media captionProfessor David Nutt: "In terms of the cost to society, alcohol causes the biggest harm"
Alcohol is more harmful than heroin or crack when the overall dangers to the individual and society are considered, according to a study in the Lancet.
The report is co-authored by Professor David Nutt, the former government chief drugs adviser who was sacked in 2009.
It ranked 20 drugs on 16 measures of harm to users and to wider society.
Heroin, crack and crystal meth were deemed worst for individuals, with alcohol, heroin and crack cocaine worst for society, and alcohol worst overall.
The study by the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs also said tobacco and cocaine were judged to be equally harmful, while ecstasy and LSD were among the least damaging.
Harm score
Professor Nutt refused to leave the drugs debate when he was sacked from his official post by the former Labour Home Secretary, Alan Johnson.
He went on to form the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs, which says it aims to investigate the drug issue without any political interference.
One of its other members is Dr Les King, another former government adviser who quit over Prof Nutt's treatment.
Members of the group, joined by two other experts, scored each drug for harms including mental and physical damage, addiction, crime and costs to the economy and communities.
Graphic comparing the harmfulness of various substances
The study involved 16 criteria, including a drug's affects on users' physical and mental health, social harms including crime, "family adversities" and environmental damage, economic costs and "international damage".
'Valid and necessary'
The findings run contrary to the government's long-established drug classification system, but the paper's authors argue that their system - based on the consensus of experts - provides an accurate assessment of harm for policy makers.
"Our findings lend support to previous work in the UK and the Netherlands, confirming that the present drug classification systems have little relation to the evidence of harm," the paper says.
"They also accord with the conclusions of previous expert reports that aggressively targeting alcohol harms is a valid and necessary public health strategy."
In 2007, Prof Nutt and colleagues undertook a limited attempt to create a harm ranking system, sparking controversy over the criteria and the findings.
The new, more complex, system ranked alcohol as three times more harmful than cocaine or tobacco. Ecstasy was ranked as causing one-eighth the harm of alcohol.
It also contradicted the Home Office's decision to make the so-called legal high mephedrone a Class B drug, saying that alcohol was five times more harmful.
The rankings have been published to coincide with a conference on drugs policy, organised by Prof Nutt's committee.
'Extraordinary lengths'
Prof Nutt told the BBC: "Overall, alcohol is the most harmful drug because it's so widely used.
"Crack cocaine is more addictive than alcohol but because alcohol is so widely used there are hundreds of thousands of people who crave alcohol every day, and those people will go to extraordinary lengths to get it."
He said it was important to separate harm to individuals and harm to society.
The Lancet paper written by Prof Nutt, Dr King and Dr Lawrence Phillips, does not examine the harm caused to users by taking more than one drug at a time.
Gavin Partington, of the Wine and Spirit Trade Association, said alcohol abuse affected "a minority" who needed "education, treatment and enforcement".
Mr Partington, who is the spokesman for the Wine and Spirit Trade Association, said millions of people enjoyed alcohol "as part of a regular and enjoyable social drink".
"Clearly alcohol misuse is a problem in the country and our real fear is that, by talking in such extreme terms, Professor Nutt and his colleagues risk switching people off from considering the real issues and the real action that is needed to tackle alcohol misuse," he said.
"We are talking about a minority. We need to focus policy around that minority, which is to do with education, treatment and enforcement."
A Home Office spokesman said: "Our priorities are clear - we want to reduce drug use, crack down on drug-related crime and di

mbhcsf · Post time 21-10-2016 05:21 AM

Edited by mbhcsf at 21-10-2016 05:50 AM

so sistem nilai / agama yg terbijak ialah mencegah dari mudarat

i guess org yg celik mata dan boleh lihat atau memikirkan hikmah dalam syariat akan tunduk pada allah...

so sekarang terjawab persoalan

a) apakah pembenci islam , sceptics islam nak making a big deal sangat dengan makanan sunnah ni dan segalanya nak exploit isu ni atas nama exploit isu bukannak menghalusi kebenaran , pun...bagai?

b) apakah yg depan mata yg jelas mendatangkan mudarat dari aspek mental, emosi dan fizikal  dan sistem tubuh badan

dipejamkan mata?

kalau org tu berilmu dia tak isukan benda benda di atas

tetapi yang  jadi isu ialah yg  golongan anti vaksin ni yg hanya tahu sekerat dan exaggerate tu salah dan gunakan makanan sunnah sebagai alasan. ini yg tak betul.

tapi untuk attack islam per se  dengan membawakan isu isu ini , adalah suatu pendekatan yg sia sia ? sebab ada berapa banyak kegiatan atau risiko perlakuan manusia dengan entiti yg menyebabkan ketagihan.

mbhcsf · Post time 21-10-2016 05:22 AM

Edited by mbhcsf at 21-10-2016 05:30 AM

u compared effect this and alcohol? judi , arak dan zina ?
mana lagi teruk?
pada saya org dengan sengaja menjerumuskan diri dengan melakukan 'kecederaan physiology dengan sengaja ' yg tidak cerdik.

Lollipop111 · Post time 21-10-2016 12:40 PM

Ianya makanan sunah bukan disebabkan makan itu kita akan kebal penyakit. Ianya makanan sunah sebab ianya berkaitan dengan amalan Rasulullah. Penyakit ini bukan faktor pemakanan semata, tetapi juga aktiviti harian, kualiti persekitaran dan jangkitan faktor luaran seperti nyamuk dan pembawa. Ini pun mahu dipusing-pusing.