|
LOL , mat slow yg hanya berani ulang isu copy paste
Bagi lah definisi medical utk paedophile
Sampai skg ko tak berani ..... pasal apa ko takut sgt?
Macamana? Jawab lah post #5 aku
Lari mat slow .... lari
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bengapnya langau kat sini.......... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm ...... tak mampu bagi definisi medical utk paedophile?
Tapi tak malu cakap pasal isu paedophile .... ini lebih dari bengap
Apa tu? Idiots are coming?
Macamana? Jawab lah post #5 aku
Lari mat slow .... lari
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEDOPHILE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apa definisi medical dia?
ha ha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pedo pedo man |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha , paedo here and there
Mintak definisi medical utk paedophilia ..... mat slow takut bagi
Mat slow dah jadi attention seeker ...... kesian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by mbhcsf at 9-2-2017 04:44 AM
• Muhammad ordered the murder of women. (Ibn Ishaq 819, 995) and beat women (sahih muslim 2127, Quran 4:24)
• Jesus never harmed a woman, He loved and cared for them.
Muhammad ordered 65 military campaigns and raids in his last 10 years. (Ibn Ishaq)
• Jesus ordered no military campaigns, nor offered any approval of war or violence.
• Muhammad killed captives taken in battle. (Ibn Ishaq 451)
• Jesus never took captives; never killed anyone.
• Muhammad was never tortured, but tortured others. (Muslim 4131, Ibn Ishaq 436, 595, 734, 764)
• Jesus suffered torture, but never tortured anyone. (Isaiah 53)
source :
http://islamiat101.blogspot.co.u ... k-of-ibn-ishaq.html
How Authentic Is The Work Of Ibn Ishaq
How Authentic Is The Work Of Ibn IshaqBismillah Hir Rehman Ir Raheem
Start In the Name Of Allah The Most Beneficent The Most Merciful
Authenticity of Ibn Ishaq
The Major Problems With Ibn Ishaq
1- His original biography didn't survive
2- Muslims Scholars Opinion
3- What Non-Muslims says about Ibn Ishaq
1- His original biography didn't survive
The original text of the Sīrat Rasūl Allah (Biography of Muhammad) by Ibn Ishaq (Medina 85 A.H.; Bagdad 151 ) did not survive. Yet it was one of the earliest substantial biographies of Muhammad. Fortunately, as noted above, much of the original text was copied over into a work of his own by Ibn Hisham (Basra; Fustat c.218 A.H.)
Ibn Hashim himself claimed:
"God willing I shall begin this book with Isma'il son of Ibrahim and mention those of his offspring who were the ancestors of God's apostle one by one with what is known about them, taking no account of Isma'il's other children, omitting some of the things which has been recorded in this book in which there is no mention of the apostle and about which the Quran says nothing and which are not relevant to anything in this book or an explanation of it or evidence for it; poems which he quotes that no authority on poetry whom I have met knows of; things which it is disgraceful to discuss; matters which would distress certain people; and such reports as al-Bakka'i told me he could not accept as trustworthy - all these things I have omitted. But God willing I shall give a full account of everything else so far as it is known and trustworthy tradition is available.
[The Life of Muhammad, A Translation of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah, with introduction and notes by Alfred Guillaume [Karachi Oxford University Press, Karachi, Tenth Impression 1995, p. 691]
2- Muslims Scholars Opinion
Shaykh ibn Taymiyyah said:
"Allah has provided evidence (i.e. Isnad) establishing the authenticity or lack thereof of the narrations that are necessary in matters of the religion. It is well known that most of what was reported in aspects of Tafsir (commentaries on the Qur'an) is similar to narrations reporting Maghazi (or Seerah) and battles, promoting Imam Ahmad to state that three matters do not have Isnad: Tafsir, Mala'him (i.e. great battles), and Maghazi. This is because most of their narrations are of the Maraseel (without reliable companions or successor) type, such as narrations reported by Urwah Ibn az-Zubair, ash-Sha'bi, az-Zuhri, Musa Ibn Uqbah and Ibn Ishaq." (Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah, Majmu' Al Fataawa, Volume, 13, page 345)
Imam Malik on Ibn Ishaq:
Imam Malik was not the only contemporary of Ibn Ishaq's to have problems with him. Despite writing the earliest biography of Prophet Muhammad, Scholars such as al-Nisa'I and Yahya b. Kattan did not view Ibn Ishaq as a reliable or authoritative source of Hadith. (Jones, J.M.B. Ibn Ishak. Vol. IV, in Encyclopaedia of Islam, edited by Ch. Pellat, and J. SchachtV.L.M.B. Lewis. London: Luzac & Co., 1971: pages 810-811)
Malik bin Anas Bin Malik bin Abu Amir Al-Asbahi (715-801 C.E.) or Imam Malik-- lived cloest in the time to the life of Prophet Muhammad of all the collectors of the hadith (Bukhari, Muslim, Abu Dawud, etc). He was born more than 80 years after the death of the Prophet. Imam Malik was a complier of a respected hadith collection, called Muwatta. Imam Malik was a hadith scholar. Imam Malik called Ibn Ishaq a liar and an imposter for writing false stories about Prophet Muhammad. Imam Malik has said that Ibn Ishaq "reports traditions on the authority of the Jews".(Kadhdhab and Dajjal min al-dajajila. Uyun al-athar, I, 16-7)
In his valuable introduction Ibn Sayyid al-Nas provides a wide-ranging survey of the controversial views on Ibn Ishaq. In his full introduction to the Gottingen edition of the Sira, Wustenfeld in turn draws extensively on Ibn Sayyid al-Nas.
Imam Hanbal and Iand Ahmad on Ibn Ishaq
Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal was asked about the solitary reports of Ibn Ishaq if they are considered reliable. He said “No!”. See Tahdhib al-Tahdhib, Da’ira Ma’arif Nizamia, Hyderabad, 1326 A.H. vol.9 p.43
Because of his tadlīs (unrealible sources) many scholars including Muhammad al-Bukhari hardly ever used his narrations in their sahih books.
(A Biography of the Prophet of Islam, By Mahdī Rizq Allāh Aḥmad, Syed Iqbal Zaheer, pg. 18)
According to al-Khatib al-Baghdādī, all scholars of ahadith except one no longer rely on any of his narrations, although truth is not foreign to him.
(Al-Khatīb al-Baghdādī, Tārīkh Baghdād)
Others, like Ahmad ibn Hanbal, rejected his narrations on all matters related to fiqh. Al-Dhahabī concluded that despite his good qualities any narration solely transmitted through him should probably be considered as containing munkar. (Al-Dhahabī, Mīzān al-itidāl fī naqd al-rijāl, at "Muhammad ibn Ishaq)
3- What Non-Muslims says about Ibn Ishaq
The work of Ibn Ishaq is much of criticism. Ibn Ishaq work contain several false stories regarding Muhammad. Even Western Non-Muslims says about Ibn Ishaq
Western non-Muslim researchers also criticized Ibn IssHaaq:
"False ascription was rife among the 8th century scholars and that in any case Ibn Ishaq and contemporaries were drawing on oral traditions." (Cook, M: Muhammad, Oxford 1983. pg. 65)
Even a famous anti-islamic scholar criticize the work of Ibn Ishaq
The famous Polemist and anti-Islam author Robert Spencer admits in his book The Truth about Muhammad , that "However, Ibn Ishaq's life of Muhammad is so unashamedly hagiographical that its accuracy is questionable." (Spencer, Robert: The Truth about Muhammad, Regnery Publishers, 2006 pg. 25)
Despite his negative opinion regarding Ibn Ishaq, out of the 400 footnotes of Robert Spencer's book, 120 footnote refer to fabricated stories from Ibn Ishaq's book. Because Robert Spencer hates Islam so much that he is willing to present these stories as if they are true, even though he knows that their source is unreliable.
______________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
menjadi seorang Islam akan menjadikan anda seorang yg beryukur dan menggunakan akal dan tidak menjadikan anugerah ini secara sia sia dan mengaibkan rasulullah saw dan Allah SWT.
menjadi seorang islam melatih anda berfikir secara analitis dan kritis berdasarkan sumber yg benar dan sahih dan kumpulan pendapat serta nukilan ilmu yg sahih daripada mereka yg diatuliahkan dan menerima ilmu secara sahih dan benar dan tidak menyanggah ASWJ framework.
so , ternyata - okay ini SALAH SATU BUKTI untuk my brothera nd sisters out there tidak meletakkan akal dan status anda sebaik baik kejadian tu kepada tahap yg paling rendah dengan mencerca rasulullah saw, Allah SWt via HIS KALAMULLAH
sebenarnya org islam yg pegang prinsip asas
hadis jibrail dah nyatakan ini: islam , iman dan ihsan cari dan hayati hadis itu. belek buku pendidikan islam semua kalau nak seek more info dan bagi asas yg kukuh dah. segagahnya individu itu untuk menghayati |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ni lagi sumber yg membuktikan bagaimana Ibnu Ishaq merekod sirah tanpa isnad :
http://www.discoveringislam.org/ibn_isshaaq_stories.htm
sangat teruk!!!
so i nak tergelak bagi merek ayg mempercayai penipuan sebegai benar
dan sila rujuk balik maksud delusion ye dalam konteks thread ini?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by sam1528 at 10-2-2017 12:00 AM
Hmmm , macamana ko tau pompuan tu 12 thn & lelaki tu 80 thn?
Saiz pompuan tu sama besar macam lelaki tu ......
Oops .... ko percaya pasal ada org kata pompuan tu 12 thn & lelaki tu 80 thn
Kalo org lain suruh ko makan taik .... ko pon makan lah
Bagus lah tu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ewwww........... jijik siot............ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You mean ttg ko makan taik?
Tak betul ke? Tak ada pon yg konfirm pompuan tu 12 & lelaki tu 80.
Ko percaya bulat2 pasal ada org cakap. Macam tu kalo org suruh ko makan taik
..... ko makan aje lah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jangan makan tahi atau minum kencing tau
|
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOL , ko dah kantoi ttg pompuan 12 & lelaki 80 thn kawin , tetiba ko
cepat tukar topik pada air kencing unta
Kan dah bagi 'peer reviewed publication' ttg the anti cancer properties
dlm air kencing unta.
Kitar semula isu yg ko sendiri tak mampu jawab
Kesian mat slow .... attention seeker yg tak berapa cerdik
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh ye , aku lupa pulak.
Ubat Premarin yg satu hari mak ko , kakak ko & bini ko akan makan - utk menopausal symtoms
Ko tau di buat dari apa? Pregnant mare urine
Skg macam mana?
Ha ha .... macamana rasa ko - satu hari mak , kakak & bini ko akan makan air kencing kuda bunting?
Kesian ..... mat slow yg tak berapa cerdik
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doctor di malaysia beri premarin kah ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apa penilaian you tentang dakwaan dakwaan ditulis itu dan sumbernya?
boleh bagi ulasan ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|