Chinese
Color
Orange
Black
Blue
Purple
Green
Deep Blue
Laman Utama
Forum
Fokus
Semasa
Kolumnis
Search
8039
View
247
Reply

[Tempatan] JAWI kena saman.. pasangan suami isteri marah sebab kena serbu siap rekod video

[Copy link]

Author: chacon    From the mobile phone    Show all posts   Read mode

Post time 17-2-2017 02:27 PM | Show all posts
miss_curious replied at 17-2-2017 02:18 PM
banyak chuolls dari seksyen 10 sampai seksyen 27..hehehe tak larat kopipes

BAB 2 DARIHAL MENANG ...

Ini macam kalau diaorang nak confirm nak tangkap orang tu... Sebab ada mention waran tangkap bagai...
Kalau SOP serbuan atau pemeriksaan je..?
Website mana ni ek?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 02:29 PM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
batrisyan replied at 17-2-2017 01:47 PM
bagusnya bawak sijil nikah.... perak takde kad kawen... xtaula kalau kami laki bini kene tangkap...  ...

Baru tau perak x de kat kawen...igat semua negeri sama..
Selangor ada kad kawen...size cam ic...siap laminate lagi....
Senang bawak kehulu ke hilir....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 02:34 PM | Show all posts
Bongok betul orang yg buat tangkapan tu,bukannya lelaki tu tk bg kerjasama malah dh inform isteri tk berpakaian lengkap.Even kalo pasangan yg berzina tk berpakaian lengkap pun ko as a pegawai tu bg diorng masa utk berpakain dulu..Lpastu br la siasat.Ni bila dpt tau org tu tk berpakaian lengkap kotey masing2 dah mcm pili bomba kot....terus tk sabar2 nak rakam gambar pompuan nak buat stok video utk disebarkan dlm group wasap.bongok....Saman je...Saman juta2..Aku bukan tk bg buat serbuan ke,pencegahan elakkan zina ke..Tp perlu jaga aib org yg diserbu juga.Memang skrg wajib kene rakam ke????Boleh tak kita saman org yg sesuka hati rakam ni tanpa izin...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 02:46 PM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
kikuri replied at 17-2-2017 01:12 PM
perlu ke rakam... nak buat apa...?

Jual kt tb3suku segmen 9999
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 02:52 PM | Show all posts
Apa hak dia nak video bagai? Sekalipun bkn somi isteri, aurat tetap aurat, yg bersalah dah tentu salah...yg pegawai ala2 sesuci embun pagi tu tak dosa ke tengok aurat ppuan?? Otak le lutut ke bang?
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 17-2-2017 02:54 PM | Show all posts
miss_curious replied at 17-2-2017 12:53 PM
AKTA 560
AKTA TATACARA JENAYAH SYARIAH (WILAYAH-WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN) 1997



aku rasa kalau ikut hukum. cukup bawa saksi 4 orang kan. perlu ke nak kena rekod bagai ni?

kalau gambar dan video orang tu tersebar.. merangkak la dia akhirat cari orang tu
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 02:55 PM | Show all posts
chacon replied at 17-2-2017 02:54 PM
aku rasa kalau ikut hukum. cukup bawa saksi 4 orang kan. perlu ke nak kena rekod bagai ni?

...

kalau ikut hukum.. tak de hukum wajib skodeng ni
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 02:59 PM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Inilah ropa sebenar pegawai jawi amar maaruf nahi mungkar yang korang dok pertahankan itu.

Geli je kan baca berita gini?
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 17-2-2017 03:01 PM | Show all posts
atira replied at 17-2-2017 02:55 PM
kalau ikut hukum.. tak de hukum wajib skodeng ni



skodeng mmgla xboleh.. tapi boleh je serbu lepas bagi salam xjawab2. cuma janganla rekod... tu bukan budaya kita  






Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:03 PM | Show all posts
Ini belum Ruu355.
Kalau Ruu355, entah macam mana dahsat serbuannya sebab
ada motip naK SEBAT PENZINA 100X....tambah galaklah
penjaga dosa orang buat serbuan...............
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:03 PM | Show all posts
Kalau aku kena camni, aku akan request panggil ke semua semua yang terlibat dalam tu especially yang merekod video dan amik gambar dan jugak yang masuk secara serbu tu. Saman pengajaran, malu,  dan jugak mintak maaf secara terbuka.

Fair right? Sebab maruah diorang pon tercalar jugak sebab mata2 yang dah tengok isteri dia.

Amcam?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:03 PM | Show all posts
dari dulu lagi...deme tak penah kena saman...mmg patut pun....main terejah je...use ic pun boleh nak detect kawin ke belum..tak yah nak tunjuk kad kawin sebenarnya...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:03 PM | Show all posts
mmg patut saman pun. at least pastikan lah dulu pasangan yg disyaki berkhalwat tu bukan pasangan suami isteri yg sah.

agak2 leh dpt satu juta x?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:09 PM | Show all posts
memang niat nak rakam video
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:10 PM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Setakat minta maaf je?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:10 PM | Show all posts
tula xde keje sampai rajin mengendap orang....cash la buat JAWI....lain kali jangan jadi bebal menunggang agama sambil humble brag ahli sorga......
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:12 PM | Show all posts
chacon replied at 17-2-2017 02:54 PM
aku rasa kalau ikut hukum. cukup bawa saksi 4 orang kan. perlu ke nak kena rekod bagai ni?

...

dalam Akta takdanya boleh rekod video ni.
rekod video ni modalnya nak malukan orang sebab ferfeeling power le tu dapat tangkap orang red-handed gamaknya
memang selayaknya disaman.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:16 PM | Show all posts
Nah tolong tepek news panjang sket. JAWI gangster.

KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 17 A husband and his wife today sued the Federal Territories Islamic Religious Department (JAWI) for raiding and arresting them for khalwat or close proximity.

Mohd Ridhuan Giman, 34, and Siti Sarah Maulad Abdullah, 26, who have been married for three years, are demanding an apology from JAWI for their traumatic experience that resulted in injuries and their wrongful detention even after showing proof of their marriage.

According to their lawyer Yusfarizal Yussoff, an enforcement team from JAWI consisting of seven male officers and one female officer had raided the couples budget hotel room in Kuala Lumpur on January 8 at about 1.30am.

Yusfarizal said the male officers had forcefully entered the hotel room despite being told by Mohd Ridhuan that his wife inside was not dressed appropriately, adding that it resulted in a scuffle that caused the husbands neck to be injured due to alleged strangulation.

Although the husband had repeatedly told the said officers that they are husband and wife and showed the officers the photo of their marriage certificate on his hand phone, the officers refused to accept the explanation.

Instead, the male officers had directed the wife, in front of her own husband, to put on her clothes in front of the male officers. One of the officers kept on taking pictures and video despite being told of our clients marital status, he told reporters at the court complex here immediately after filing the lawsuit.

According to court documents, the wife was only wearing a sleeveless singlet with thin straps and shorts a condition which should not be viewed by men who are not muhrim or the immediate family members of a woman when the male enforcement officers barged in and saw her.

The husband was brought to the hotel lobby, while the wife protested a male enforcement officers presence inside the hotel room and sought privacy to dress, the document said.

The female enforcement officer had finally entered the hotel room and directed the wife to dress in the attached bathroom, but the wife refused as it had transparent glass walls, resulting in the wife being ordered to dress with the door to the hotel room open as the officers waited outside.

When the wife attempted to close the room door to protect her dignity as a woman, one of the male officers allegedly forcefully pushed the door and the wifes chest, with this scuffle also resulting in bruises to her left arm, the document said.

The couple said they were brought to a police station where their arrest was reported as being over a khalwat offence, before being brought to JAWIs office where they were detained in two separate locked rooms for about an hour.

The husbands mother then came to JAWIs office and presented the original copy of the couples marriage certificate which had been issued by JAWI, but JAWIs enforcement officers allegedly refused to accept it as proof of their marriage and to release them.

The enforcement officers instead forced the mother to sign a personal bond to give her personal assurance that the couple would return for investigations on January 17 and which would compel her to pay RM3,000 if they did not show up.

Despite the mothers refusal to sign the personal bond as the certificate had been produced and no khalwat offence was committed, the officers insisted on her signing to secure the duos release, the court document said.

After the mother signed, the duo were finally released after they were also both forced to sign a personal bond stating that they were arrested for the khalwat offence under Section 27(b) of the Shariah Criminal Offences (Federal Territories) Act 1997.  

Under Section 27(b), a woman found with at least one man who is not her husband or mahram (immediate family members) in any secluded place or a house or room under circumstances which raises suspicion that they were engaged in immoral acts are liable to a maximum RM3,000 fine or to a maximum two-year jail term or both.

The couple and the mother are suing for wrongful arrest, wrongful confinement, trespass to person, violation of privacy, tort of abuse of office and violation of the duos rights to personal liberty and freedom of movement under the Federal Constitution's Articles 5 and 9.

They are suing two of the JAWI enforcement officers who have been identified as Mohd Shiham Ramli, Mohammad Izehar Md Amin; JAWI chief religious enforcement officer, JAWI director-general, JAWI, the Prime Ministers Department and the government of Malaysia.

Claiming that the raid had breached the Shariah Criminal Procedure (Federal Territories) Act 1997, the couple are now seeking compensation in the form of general damages for the injury to their reputation and indignity suffered as well as trauma, besides the duos physical injury that required treatment at Hospital Kuala Lumpur.

They are also seeking aggravated damages, exemplary damages, a court order instructing JAWI to drop the investigation, as well as an unconditional apology in the form of a letter to the them and in at least two Malay-language newspapers.

Yusfarizal explained that the lawsuit was filed after JAWI failed to respond to two letters of demand dated January 11 and January 19 that were hand delivered D with the second received directly by JAWI's director general, while the court document said that JAWI had following the first letter instead fixed January 19 for the couple to appear at JAWI's office for investigation.

- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.co ... thash.EP1O42Sn.dpuf
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:19 PM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
saman jgn tak saman!!!!!!!!
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:22 PM | Show all posts
dee4ellese replied at 17-2-2017 02:27 PM
Ini macam kalau diaorang nak confirm nak tangkap orang tu... Sebab ada mention waran tangkap bagai ...

i dapat from website E-syariah Portal
http://www.esyariah.gov.my/

kalau SOP nak tangkap khalwat..i have no  idea..
bagus jugak tanya pasal SOP ni..

i nak try tanya kawan yang kerja JAIS lah

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:23 PM | Show all posts
They are suing two of the JAWI enforcement officers who have been identified as Mohd Shiham Ramli, Mohammad Izehar Md Amin; JAWI chief religious enforcement officer, JAWI director-general, JAWI, the Prime Ministers Department and the government of Malaysia.


meh tepek sini muka JAWI sangap ni.

mak plaintif dah bawak sijil nikah pun giler takmo mengalah.

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:24 PM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
harap lepas ni pegawai khalwat neh lebih berintegriti
ko rakam nak buat modal lancap tu...xyah la...degil btol..
nnt aib ko plak orang sebarkan
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:24 PM | Show all posts
Edited by v(T.T)v at 17-2-2017 03:28 PM

Kebaikan Talibanisasi, pegawai agama rasa sendiri paling besar.
kalao suka mesia jadi Iran ke afganistan ke, jangan harap ada hak asasi manusia lagi.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:27 PM | Show all posts
mana respon dpd jawi ni...tak pueh dgr sebelah pihak je ni...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-2-2017 03:30 PM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Wife dia anak tuttutt kah?..
'Maulad Abdullah' ni diguna utk anak yg tak sah taraf sama dgn nama cucu jiran aku
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register | Facebook Login

Points Rules

 CARI App
Get it FREE Apple App Store
Get it FREE Google play
 Instagram
cari_infonet
FOLLOW
Copyright © 1996-2017 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd All Rights Reserved(483575-W)
0.073287s Gzip On
Quick Reply To Top Return to the list