CARI Infonet

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

12Next
Return to list New
View: 3444|Reply: 24

[Tempatan] [Gempar] Krisis kehakiman yang marhaen tak akan ambil tahu; Pendedahan TERBUKA o

  [Copy link]
Post time 15-2-2019 10:43 AM | Show all posts |Read mode
Judge Exposes Alleged Foul Play Behind The Court Cases Of Anwar, Karpal Singh, And More


By Jia Vern Tham — 15 Feb 2019, 09:03 AM

The affidavit, which was filed by Justice Hamid Sultan Abu Backer, reveals misconduct in the judiciary.


Court of Appeal Judge Datuk Hamid Sultan Abu Backer filed a 63-page affidavit yesterday, 14 January, alleging misconduct by top members of the judiciary


Justice Hamid Sultan Abu Backer



The affidavit was filed in support of the daughter of Karpal Singh, Sangeet Kaur Deo's court application to seek a declaration that Chief Justice Richard Malanjum failed to complete investigations into cases of judicial interference.

The 63-page document revealed allegations of bullying and coercion of lawyers, constitutional conspiracy, and the purported interference of high-profile court cases in the country.




These are the highlights of court cases stated in Hamid's affidavit, as sighted by SAYS:



1. The case of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim

According to Hamid, an event was held in the Palace of Justice nearing the retirement of a Chief Justice who decided on Anwar's case. The Chief Justice was then praised by an unnamed minister, who said "the government would not forget all the good things" he did.

One Federal Court member, who sat in Anwar's case a day before his retirement, purportedly had an urgent meeting with the Deputy Prime Minister. Another Chief Justice, who also sat in Anwar's case, is an Antagonist of Rule of Law and Constitution (ARLC) known for judicial interference.



Anwar Ibrahim
Image via Berita Harian



Hamid also revealed that the prosecution in Anwar's case failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, and no fair trial was offered to the Prime Minister-in-waiting. However, the issue was "brushed aside" by the Court of Appeal.

Moreover, in a case of 'constitutional conspiracy', both the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court allegedly dug for evidence to justify Anwar's conviction.

"In addition to the five years' sentence, Anwar's case was in fact a judicial tragedy, which has brought shame to the integrity of our judicial process," Hamid said.




2. The case of Karpal Singh

Following the 14th General Election, a senior Court of Appeal judge, who was involved in deciding Karpal's sedition case, allegedly confessed to Hamid that verdict of the case was directed to be changed.

The initial verdict was in favour of Karpal. This information reportedly supports the claim by Karpal's daughter Sangeet Kaur Deo, who reported that the late lawyer's acquittal was asked to be reversed to conviction in 2016.




The late Karpal Singh
Image via Malaysiakini



Hamid added that a female judge who refused to adhere to the 'reversal' lost her chance for promotion, and she was bypassed in elevation to the Federal Court. She eventually received her promotion after the 14th General Election, albeit losing seniority and some income.

"(She) was one of the most hard-working judges... In my view, the lady judge was the best Malay lady judge in our judiciary history.




3. The case of Indira Gandhi


Hamid was accused of judicial activism by ARLC after he ruled the conversion of Indira Gandhi's children as illegal in 2016.

"He (ARLC) also threw tantrums in an uncivilised manner... His unconstitutional conduct has caused me great mental stress and still continuing," Hamid said in the affidavit.

Malaysiakini reported in 2018 that Hamid was no longer assigned to hear cases that are constitution-related and involving public interests following Indira's case.



Indira Gandhi
Image via Malay Mail





4. The case of Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad

The Edge Markets reported in 2014 that current Setiawangsa Member of Parliament (MP) Nik Nazmi was charged under the Peaceful Assembly Act for organising the Black Out Rally in 2013.

However, Hamid was among the three-man bench who ruled that it was unconstitutional to require citizens to give a 10-day notice to hold a peaceful assembly.

"That judgement was a historical one in relation to peaceful assembly. Our decision was not appealable under the law," Hamid said in the affidavit.



Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad
Image via Astro Awani



Hamid alleged that the decision backfired after top judges joined hands to suggest that constitutional issues must be heard by the Federal Court, instead of the Court of Appeal.

"ARLC subsequently came to sit in the Court of Appeal... to overrule the effect of our decision," the Court of Appeal judge revealed.

"Because of the said unconstitutional overruling, there arose an opportunity to charge important opposition members such that some of them were not able to stand in the election," Hamid added.




5. The case of Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad





Hamid claimed that certain judges showed "comical" jurisprudence when it came to the cases brought by Mahathir.

"In one case brought by the current Prime Minister, one judge told me the relevant High Court judge was called by ARLC to dismiss his (Mahathir's) application," Hamid said.

Sin Chew Daily reported that the case Hamid was referring to is the Prime Minister's bid to challenge the appointment of Chief Justice Tun Md Raus Sharif and Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin in 2017.




The Court of Appeal judge stressed that the judiciary must be 'cleaned up' to rid Malaysia of kleptocracy

"I hope and pray that the other right-thinking members of the judiciary will sincerely join hands to clean the judiciary (and) save Malaysia from kleptocracy," Hamid said in the affidavit.

According to him, Pakatan Harapan decided to continue having the "same players" in the judiciary with "cosmetic changes" – which is not enough.

Hamid eventually called for this "judicial scandal" to be addressed in order to uphold the integrity of the rule of law.








Rate

2

View Rating Log

Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


 Author| Post time 15-2-2019 10:45 AM | Show all posts
Edited by dauswq at 15-2-2019 10:47 AM

patutlah susah benar nak ada dissenting opinions

rupanya justice semua kena ugut keluarkan dissenting opinion..

aku gugel judge yg handle karpal singh adalah justice ni..

kerana bagi dissenting opinion, abis promotions dia kena cut..
gila ker ape?
YA Dato' Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat                                                                     


        
                                 


YA Dato' Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat


Federal Court Judge


DPSK


  • Her Ladyship was appointed as Judicial Commisioner at the Kuala Lumpur High Court from 2nd October 2006 until 4th September 2007.
  • Her Ladyship was appointed as High Court Judge, Kuala Lumpur from 5th September 2007 until 31st March 2011.
  • Her Ladyship was appointed as High Court Judge, Shah Alam, Selangor from 1st April 2011 until 7th January 2013.
  • Her Ladyship was appointed as Court of Appeal Judge from 08th January 2013 until 25th November 2018.
  • Her Ladyship was appointed as Federal Court Judge from 26th November 2018 until now.


ADDRESS:
        Federal Court Judges' Chambers
        Level 5 (South), Istana Kehakiman
        Precint 3
        62506 PUTRAJAYA
   +603 8880 9412   +603 8880 3543
tgmaimun@kehakiman.gov.my

Court restores late Karpal’s status as MP

Ho Kit Yen -

May 30, 2016 11:36 AM

  1.2k      Shares  
        


    1k
        
    121
    
    



PUTRAJAYA: The appeals court has allowed the late lawyer and Bukit Gelugor MP Karpal Singh’s appeal on his RM4,000 fine over his conviction for sedition. He had questioned the late Perak Sultan, Sultan Azlan Shah on the appointment of the Menteri Besar in 2009.

The Court’s decision means that Karpal’s widow, Gurmeet Kaur, can enjoy his pension benefits.
“The appeal on sentence is allowed. The fine is reduced to RM1,800,” said Justice Mohtarudin Baki.



Upon hearing the decision to set aside the RM4,000 fine, Gurmit was seen weeping at the public bench.
However, the same court dismissed the late Karpal’s appeal on his conviction. Justice Mohtarudin Baki, along with Justice Kamardin Hashim, ruled in a majority judgment that the conviction was safe.

“The accused crossed the line when he gave his comments about the Sultan removing former Menteri Besar Nizar Jamaluddin,” said Justice Mohtarudin. “It was not denied that he was a member of parliament and a lawyer.”

“He was giving his comments. However, it’s not worthy to make such comments about a Ruler.”
He added that the statements by Karpal were very “disrespectful”.

The majority judgment found that the defence for Karpal did not fall under Section 3(2) of the Sedition Act.

Dissenting judge Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat found that the defence fell under Section 3(2). “The accused wanted to show the Ruler was wrong,” she said.

Karpal was charged with sedition for saying the removal of Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin by the Sultan, and the appointment of Zambry Abdul Kadir as the new Menteri Besar, could be questioned in court.

On 21 February 2014, the then DAP Chairman was found guilty of sedition for questioning the Sultan of Perak removing former Menteri Besar Nizar Jamaluddin during the 2009 Perak Menteri Besar crisis.

On March 11, he was fined RM4,000.

Karpal passed away in a road accident on 17 April 2014.

An appeal was filed on August 21 last year, naming Karpal’s wife, Gurmeet, as the appellant.

Lawyer and Puchong MP Gobind Singh, Karpal’s son, said the family welcomed the decision by the court. “He was not disqualified as a member of parliament,” he said.

Gobind disclosed that he wants to study both judgments before deciding whether to bring up the matter in the Federal Court.


Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 15-2-2019 10:49 AM | Show all posts
byk foul plays main semasa decide kes anwar , karpal singh dan lain2..
ni pun dr pengetahuan justice hamid backer.

mgkn justice lain jd mangsa politaik (#cashisking) pun ade pengakuan nya juga.
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 15-2-2019 10:51 AM | Show all posts
@cmf_almondpecan @Maideen. @petola  @noraidil_06

dipersilakan komen
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 15-2-2019 11:00 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
This is very heavy topic. A shameful to legal fraternity. I personally believe court of law free from upper hand.

I always believe court will do all the necessary steps to ensure justice prevail.

Kes2 psl upper hand in court ni berlaku zmn tun sahaja. In fact jadi kajian dlm subject Jurisprudens.

Jap i baca article
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 15-2-2019 11:04 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Kan .... sib baik PH menang, baru terbukak semua pekung Umno... And more to come
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 15-2-2019 11:04 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Kan .... sib baik PH menang, baru terbukak semua pekung Umno... And more to come
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 15-2-2019 11:25 AM | Show all posts
terigt ttg poisonous letter dolu kala yg mana hakim2 yg sungguh baik sewaktu di bench bertukar jd rimau samada dlm chamber mahupun kat atas bench sbb nama diaorg ada dlm surat tu
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 15-2-2019 11:32 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
pyropura replied at 15-2-2019 11:04 AM
Kan .... sib baik PH menang, baru terbukak semua pekung Umno... And more to come

Umno ke Mahathir ?  Mcm yg ramkarpal dedahkan ada campurtangan direct ke atas jabatan peguam negara minggu ni
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 15-2-2019 11:34 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
tangan ghaib dlm Kerajaan arahkan Jabatan Peguam Negara - dedah Ram Karpal

Peguamcara Hanifah mesti disingkirkan jika terima arahan kerajaan - Ramkarpal

Ramkarpal merujuk kepada e-mel Hanafiah kepada semua Timbalan Pendakwa Raya mengenai arahan kerajaan untuk mempercepatkan beberapa kes berprofil tinggi.

Peguamcara Mohamad Hanafiah Zakariah perlu disingkirkan jika beliau tidak memahami fungsi Jabatan Peguam Negara yang sepatutnya bebas dan tidak menerima arahan daripada kerajaan, kata Anggota Parlimen Bukit Gelugor, Ramkarpal Singh.

Beliau berkata demikian merujuk kepada e-mel Hanafiah kepada semua Timbalan Pendakwa Raya mengenai arahan kerajaan untuk mempercepatkan beberapa kes berprofil tinggi, termasuk kes melibatkan 1MDB dan SRC International Sdn Bhd.

"Pendirian Hanafiah dalam hal ini serius.

"Ini mencerminkan kejahilannya terhadap fakta bahawa Jabatan Peguam Negara sentiasa bebas daripada arahan kerajaan dan sepatutnya tidak berpihak.

"Ini adalah kesalahan serius dan memalukan terhadap Hanafiah. Beliau harus meletakkan jawatan jika beliau tidak faham ini, (dan) kalau tidak disingkirkan," kata anggota parlimen DAP itu dalam kenyataan malam ini.

Ketika mempertahankan e-mel berkenaan, Hanifah berkata Jabatan Peguam Negara adalah sebahagian daripada jentera kerajaan dan akan mematuhi arahan kerajaan.

Ramparkal berkata mengikut undang-undang sepatutnya Jabatan Peguam Negara memberikan nasihat kepada kerajaan dan bukannya menerima arahan dari kerajaan.

"Hanafiah telah lupa bahawa Peguam Negara adalah bebas dan mendakwa mengikut bukti dan tidak pernah diarahkan, sama ada oleh kerajaan atau sebaliknya.

"Kita perlukan inividu yang bebas untuk tugas itu. Bukan mereka yang menerima arahan daripada kerajaan," katanya.

Rate

1

View Rating Log

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 15-2-2019 06:14 PM | Show all posts
dauswq replied at 15-2-2019 10:51 AM
@cmf_almondpecan @Maideen. @petola  @noraidil_06

dipersilakan komen

Thanks. Saya belum sempat habiskan membaca affidavit penuh Justice Hamid. Tp dari beberapa bahagian yg dibaca setakat ni, kalau betul apa yang dituduh tu mmg patutlah juga dia dedahkan. Walaupun seorang hakim etikanya tak campur tangan byk benda di luar tugas dia, perkara salah guna kuasa dan jenayah dlm badan kehakiman adalah amat serius dan mungkin boleh justify pendedahan Justice Hamid ni.

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 16-2-2019 05:01 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
harizs replied at 15-2-2019 11:32 AM
Umno ke Mahathir ?  Mcm yg ramkarpal dedahkan ada campurtangan direct ke atas jabatan peguam negar ...

When madey was Umno man. Umno lah tuh
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 16-2-2019 05:11 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
Kita berdoa lah agar nyawa Hakim Datuk Hamid Bakar ni selamat.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 16-2-2019 05:13 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
So selama ni aku betul sebab tak penah  percaya Nuart tu bersalah ....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 16-2-2019 05:58 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
harizs replied at 15-2-2019 11:34 AM
tangan ghaib dlm Kerajaan arahkan Jabatan Peguam Negara - dedah Ram Karpal

Peguamcara Hanifah mes ...

Kes profil tinggi tu termasuk kes Adib ke ape?marah benor suruh cepatkn
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 16-2-2019 09:58 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
batmana replied at 16-2-2019 05:58 AM
Kes profil tinggi tu termasuk kes Adib ke ape?marah benor suruh cepatkn

Ramkarpal bukan expose pasal nak cepatkan.. Ramkarpal expose pasal adanya interfere secara langsung tangan2 ghaib dlm KERA-jaan secara terus terhadap jabatan peguam negara mcm zaman PM 4
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 16-2-2019 10:00 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
pyropura replied at 16-2-2019 05:01 AM
When madey was Umno man. Umno lah tuh

Lain tu..  Mahathir is Mahathir.. Cara dia. Cara PM 4... Skrg dia buat lagi. Spt yg didedahkan oleh ramkarpal. Ramkarpal dedahkan bukti campurtangan secara langsung dlm Jabatan Peguam Negara minggu lepas.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 16-2-2019 10:02 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
pyropura replied at 16-2-2019 05:13 AM
So selama ni aku betul sebab tak penah  percaya Nuart tu bersalah ....

Mahathir dah jawab di Oxford... 9 bulan anwar dibicarakan dgn adil di mahkamah & bukan seorang hakim yg buat keputusan ke atas anwar.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 16-2-2019 10:04 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
batmana replied at 16-2-2019 05:58 AM
Kes profil tinggi tu termasuk kes Adib ke ape?marah benor suruh cepatkn

Ramparkal berkata mengikut undang-undang sepatutnya Jabatan Peguam Negara memberikan nasihat kepada kerajaan dan bukannya menerima arahan dari kerajaan.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 16-2-2019 10:05 AM From the mobile phone | Show all posts
pyropura replied at 16-2-2019 05:13 AM
So selama ni aku betul sebab tak penah  percaya Nuart tu bersalah ....

Tapi madey cakap anwar bersalah..bukan heol memang yang penjara anwar..
Masa kat Oxford bukan madey kata anwar dijatuhkan hukuman oleh hakim setelah dibawa berbagai bukti dalam mahkamah..
Reply

Use magic Report

12Next
Return to list New
You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CARI Infonet

29-3-2024 02:48 PM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.224270 second(s), 47 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list