A bit heavy to read, but good to read and think about over the weekend ..
MALAYA CHEATED SARAWAK ON PETRONAS AGREEMENT 1976 BUT THIS DOES NOT EXONERATE SARAWAK GOV'T FOR NOT TERMINATING AGREEMENT FOR FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION
5% cash payment and Petronas as the national oil corporation under the dying pleas of PM Tun Razak.
By Alex Ling, MA LLB Cambridge University
History
Under the 4 dying pleas of PM Tun Razak, struck down by a serious terminal leukemia, predicted to survive till the end of December 1975 by the Harley Street Doctors, London, Tun Rahman, the YAB Chief Minister of Sarawak then, as the Head of BN Sarawak under extreme pressure of human compassion and political alignment to BN Federal most reluctantly succumbed to PM’s dying pleas on grounds of national interest.
However there were other considerations. Originally Tun Rahman decried publicly in the media when he knew the Bill on the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA 1974).
“I then instructed the State Attorney General [Datuk Jemuri] to write to the Federal AG to say that if PDA (1974) Bill is not withdrawn, I would take the Federal Government to Court!”, fumed Tun Rahman who never requested to form Petronas nor asked only for 5% cash payment. With respect, Tengku Razaleigh (Kuli) should not rewrite “history” incorrectly in the Daily Expressin Sabah.
“What is this taking the Federal Government to Court?” demanded Tun Razak.
“Sarawak oil and gas belongs to Sarawak” explained Tun Rahman. “Sarawak’s position would be very different from Kelantan and other States of Malaya…” Only Sarawak and North Borneo (Sabah) have the respective British Order in Council 1954 (OIC) on respective (Alterations of Boundaries) where the boundaries of the respective continental shelf were their international boundaries. Those OIC were 3 years before Merdeka of Malaya on 31stAugust 1957 which never had that OIC, unknown to Tan Sri Kadir, the Federal AG then.
Ultimately Tun Rahman managed to convince Tun Razak, the Federal AG and Tun Tan Siew Sin (Tun TSS) after explaining the legal opinions of the QC from London, the ex-federal AG of Australia, an expert on the international law of the sea and natural resources from Cambridge University, and a retired Judge, stating basically that the PDA 1974 was ultra vires, void basically against the 7 entrenched federal provisions of the Federal Constitution (7 FCs) and illegal against the 7 protective laws of Sarawak (7 PMs), therefore unenforceable against Sarawak.
Indeed Tun Razak and the Federal AG were convinced that Sarawak would easily win the Declaratory Judgment in the Privy Council, still allowed then, with a strong Bench in the Privy Council of Lord Wilberforce, Lord Fraser and Chief Justice Barwick of Australia often hearing the appeals from the Commonwealth.
So PM Tun Razak proposed the 5% cash payment and Petronas to be the national oil corporation under his dying pleas to Tun Rahman below.
The Four Dying Pleas of Tun Razak to Tun Rahman.
1st Plea:
Sarawak should have 5% cash payment for its O&G based on their sales prices instead of royalty.
Tan Sri Kadir has coined the “cash payment” on the O&G’s royalty by skirting around the ceiling of royalty defined in Item 3 Part V 10th Schedule of the FC to mean 10% ad valorem (production costs at site), not on selling prices of O&G.
Unknown to Professor Farouki under the Sarawak Oil Concession System before PDA 1974, that royalty was 12% ad valorem, 2percent higher.
That 5% was never intended to be reasonable nor adequate compensation money under Article 13 of the FC, applicable only to the States of Malaya, as compulsory acquisition was absolutely forbidden under Articles 76(4), 95(D), Items 2(d) and 2(a) of the State List. Sarawak has the exclusive right to issue all the exploration licenses and O&G’s leases (PSCs or RSCs) under Item 2(c) of State List and 8(j) of the Federal List, under the 9thSchedule, reinforced by the amended Sarawak Oil Mining Ordinance 1958 (OMO 1958) and Sarawak Land Code 1958 (SLC 1958) (rendering leases invalid unless registered under Section 112) with 7PMs and 7FCs.
2nd Plea:
Tun Razak fervently pleaded with Tun Rahman to abort on behalf of Sarawak the intended Declaratory Judgement in the Privy Council that the PDA 1974 would be unconstitutional and void, illegal and unenforceable based on the legal 3 opinions accepted by PM and the Federal AG.
So, Tun Razak assured Tun Rahman under Article VIII of MA 1963 that in consideration of aborting that appeal to the Privy Council on the PDA 1974, the Federal Government, not Petronas which pays the official 5% cash payment under Sarawak Oil Agreement of 27thMarch 1975 (SOA), would pay an additional, unofficial but orally 5% cash payment as additional fund, not grant, for development.
Tun Rahman requested for a side letter on that additional 5% cash payment. Tun Razak refused because that could be leaked out to Tun Mustapha and Tun Fuad who would also ask for the same. PM explained that Sabah has already 40% rebate as grant back to Sabah for all Federal Incomes received from Sabah. Sarawak was not entitled under Item 2(1) of Part IV, 10th Schedule.
However, in return for that unofficial additional 5% cash payment Tun Razak wanted Tun Rahman to execute the vesting instrument without DUN’s approval to Petronas by the Sarawak Government stipulated under Section 2(2) of PDA 1974, namely to assign all Sarawak’s rights of its O&G in perpetuity, allowed under Section 13(1)(a) of SLC 1958, because Tun Razak wanted to show it to Tun Mustapha and Tun Fuad while trying to convince them that Sarawak has already executed on the 5% cash payment and that Sabah legislature should also accept 5% and amend Section 48 of the Sabah Land Ordinance from 99 years to 999 years in perpetuity.
In fact Tun Razak and Tun TSS had deliberately misrepresented to Tun Rahman and DCM Tan Sri Stephen Yong KT (Tan Sri SY) negotiating for Sarawak well before the execution of that vesting instrument and SOA dated on 27thMarch 1975 that Sabah had also already agreed to the cash payment of 5% which was untrue. But Sarawak negotiators genuinely believed that and were thereby misled to agreeing on that 5%.
The Memoirs of Tan Sri SY, “A Life Twice Lived” on page 132 corroborated that:
“Our position in negotiations concerning the oil and gas royalties was considerably weakened when the Chief Minister of Sabah, Tun Mustapha, agreed to a paltry 5% settlement [cash payment].”
Tun Mustapha and Tun Fuad countered 5% as a “pittance”.
That 5% (official) was the consequences of “divide and rule” by passing misinformation to mislead both Sarawak and Sabah whose leaders should have discussed that 5% first.
Both PM and Tun Rahman knew that the PDA 1974 and the vesting instrument without DUN’s approval were also unconstitutional and void, illegal and unenforceable; one day those issues would have to be settled in court. Meanwhile, both believed on grounds of national interest Sarawak would still receive 5% more than Sabah. Moreover Tun Razak assured Tun Rahman that the cash payments would be increased when Petronas would be cash rich later, unfortunately used mainly for “salvaging” or developing federal projects.
YAB Tun Fuad resisted until his fatal air crash on 6thJune 1976 with investigation report still gagged. Luckily just before that flight Datuk Harris requested Tengku Kuli and Tun Rahman to sit in the other NOMAD aircraft “to see his cattle farm in Banggi”. So Tan Sri Harris Salleh as the new Chief Minister executed the Sabah Oil Agreement on the 5% cash payment on 14th June 1976, 8 days later or 6 months after Tun Razak’s death on 14thJanuary 1976.
3rd Plea:
The Federal Government and Petronas must have all the balance of the proceeds after the cash payments and contractors’ portions, absolutely necessary needed to fulfil the total commitments under MA 1963, apart from defraying the inevitable high security costs in Sabah which would be considered as “national interest”, corroborated in the same Memoirs on page 132.
“The Prime Minister thn appealed to Sarawak to follow suit [Untrue representation that Sabah had already agreed to that 5%] on the grounds of “national interest,” arguing that the Malaysian Royal Navy would have to bear the expense of safeguarding the continental shelf. We reluctantly accepted the terms, and to many Sarawakians this was tantamount to giving away our precious natural resources [crown jewel].”
4th Plea:
The 4th plea was to make Petronas as the national oil corporation to kick start the O&G industry on grounds of national interest as Tun Razak wanted to transform Malaysia to a developing nation in The Third World under the PM’s sole control under PDA 1974, but outside the hands of the civil servants, to be run by oil professionals. That was a wise critical move for the success of Petronas.
1) No answer to dying plea of national interest by PM
When the dying Prime Minister appealed on grounds of national interest it would be extremely difficult for Sarawak negotiators to reject the 4 dying pleas. So they reluctantly accepted that in considerations of the followings:
1) 4 dying pleas of PM of the nation and Federal BN Chief on political alignment, human compassion and grounds of national interests.
2) 5% cash payment for Sarawak (Should be quarterly not yearly or 6 monthly) officially from Petronas under SOA of 27th March 1975.
3) An additional 5% cash payment or 50% from the Federal Government (not denied) out of the 10% gross to be paid by Petronas before cost recoveries as the unofficial payment for aborting the Declaratory Judgement of PDA 1974 in the Privy Council, assured by PM under Article VIII of MA63.
Tengku Razaleigh has unfortunately glossed over this unofficial 5% cash payment as the official 5%, as if there was only 5% cash payment.
1) Future State Sales Tax (SST) would be enforceable on O&G and all petroleum products say 5% to 10% [No limit under Item 7 Part V 10th Schedule], as an alternative if the Federal Government refuses to increase the cash payment (royalty).
Tun Rahman and Tan Sri Adenan were briefed on this SST by the writer. For the oral history, the writer has legally verified numerous times with Tun Rahman on the PDA 1974 and part payments of the unofficial 5% cash payment before his death on our numerous golf trips, corroborated by Tun TSS, Tan Sri SY and Tan Sri Kadir.
During the colonial days when “God Save The Queen” was played at the end of the party, everybody has to go home as a convention.
Similarly, when the “toast of national interest” was raised in the meeting, that discussion must end.
1) Tun Rahman really believed that the Federal Government would fulfill that oral assurance on the additional and unofficial 5% cash payment.
However, the State Sales Tax Ordinance 1990 which was only promulgated in 1990 was sanctioned under Clause 24 of the IGCR 1962, Item 7 of Part V, Fifth Schedule 66 of the Malaysian Act 1963, as “Annex A” to MA 1963, the Mother of the FC and Item 7 Part V above mentioned.
So Sarawak would get 10% cash payments and 5% SST totalling to 15%. After a few cash payments, the Federal Government stopped that additional and unofficial 5% cash payment though Petronas made billions. Tun Razak did not foresee that the Federal Government would renegade on that.
1) Shares of Petronas were thrown in as a mere red herring, a ploy to give hope only.
“During the period when I was part of the coalition government in Sarawak, our relationship with the federal government was generally fairly good. Obviously there were some conflicting views, and one of these concerned the ownership of our oil and gas reserves, most of which are found on the continental shelf off the coast of Sarawak. We in Sarawak maintained that all the rights belonged to the state, but the federal government, for obvious reasons, thought otherwise. We put up a strong fight, to extent of referring the issue to court and obtaining the opinion of a Queen’s Counsel from Britain.
This matter was partially resolved by a proposal to share the royalty from oil and gas extracted, with Sarawak to be given a certain amount of equity in Petronas when it was established. Abdul Rahman Yakub and I had numerous discussions with Prime Minister Tun Razak and Finance Minister Tan Siew Sin about the amount of royalty, but we made little progress.”: on page 132 of the same Memoirs.
1) Tun TYT Pehin Sri Taib who was the pertinent federal minister was told by PM not to get involved on the negotiations on Sarawak O&G. Petronas’s/Federal Government’s bonanza profits/revenues could never be shared nor public listed after OPEC with oil tripled to around US$18 bbl in 1973/75 up to US$120bbl in 2000 with about 35% split barrels (s/b)/share profits sp) of O&G fraudulently omitted in the Petronas annual audited accounts filed with ROC/SSM. In 2017, there was undenied colossal discrepancy of RM19.298billion net profit.
1) Why the assurance of all offshore oil revenues of Sarawak O&G was unfulfilled by the Federal Government and Petronas?
In early 1966, because of the vast deficits in the federal budgets, that was why Tun TSS and Tun Razak, assured Sarawak through YAB Datuk Tawi Sli, to inform the Sarawak Cabinet that all the offshore oil proceeds of Sarawak would be given to Sarawak provided the Sarawak Capitation Grant of RM27 million [actually only 10% less than the previous year is allowed under Article 109(1) of the FC] was to be reduced to Rm12 million and the Special Grant (balancing) of RM5.8 million to be waived. This was confirmed in “The Rising Moon,” by Michael Leigh.
1) In 1969, that Annual Special Grant of Rm 5.8 million was abolished but not replaced by another grant under Article 112D(1) nor any offshore O&G proceeds was received by Sarawak under the above mentioned assurance. The Annual Escalating Grant was revised once with the last payment of Rm 16 million in 1973 and not renewed every 5 years nor at all till today.
“I have to grind and bear, cut here and patch there......never enough for the total deficit budgets,” as Tun Tan Siew Sin had confirmed to the writer. Sulu attacks in Sabah were costly. Traditional exports and sources of revenues without O&G would be a foregone conclusion, namely unable to build up Malaysia as today, but at the price of neglecting the development of the Borneo States until recently.
In fact the Petroleum Mining Act 1966 and the Continental Shelf Act 1966 [repealed in 2011] were passed as the first move to take over unconstitutionally and illegally the dominion (ownership) of Sarawak’s O&G fortified by Emergency Legislation No.7, 10 and 11 1969 with PDA 1974, Act 354 1976, EEZ Act 1984 and the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (TSA). The Federal has only imperium, administrative and supervising powers, though it has sovereignty in international level between nations only. The communists were in the Sarawak jungle not inside nor outside its territorial waters.
1) On the 4th dying plea of making Petronas the national oil corporation.
Tun Rahman did not propose the above was corroborated in the same Memoirs on page 132: “I remember an incident in one of the state supreme council (state cabinet) meetings on May 23rd1974, when Abdul Rahman flared up on being told that federal treasury had not sent the necessary funds for security operations in Sarawak. He said that if the funds did not arrive by May 27th, he would not support the formation of the Petroleum National Berhad (Petronas), and would let Chong Hon Ngian, the then secretary general of the treasury, take over the security situation in Sarawak. That really got the bureaucratic wheels in motion and the funds came in on time.”
Sadly, due payments from federal would still need political more than legal leverage.
So, the Sarawak negotiators did not really “sell out” Sarawak as many would not know the details and circumstances. They obtained for Sarawak, namely (a) and (b):
1) The 5% cash payment based on the selling price of O&G
2) The 5% oral unofficial and additional cash payments which Tun Razak refused to put that assurance under a side letter. But this assurance is still enforceable under Article VIII of MA 1963, Customary International Law and Article 3(a) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1959 as MA 1963 is also a multilateral treaty. Proof of past payments and receipts are traceable under equity of tracing and Discoveries of documents in court. The balance is over RM25 billion accruing daily at about 858,000 bbl/boe.
3) They knew Sarawak is entitled to impose 5% to 10% SST on Sarawak’s O&G and Petroleum products, recently confirmed by the courts. That is why the Federal Government had to fudge Article 95B(3) and Item 8(J) of the Federal List 9th Schedule (unchallenged).
4) Now the restitution of the short-changed cash payment of about 35% SB/SP on Sarawak’s O&G amounting to billions excluded in the Petronas accounts filed in ROC/SSM for 44 years with discounts and staggered payments would be in order.
In brief Sarawak would have attained 15% (Cash payments 10%, the short changed quantum plus 5 to 10% SST) totalling 15 to 20% depending on the productions at different stages of upstream and downstream development, quite close to the calculated 20% cash payment (royalty) unanimously endorsed by DUN under Tok Nan’s watch.
End of article. This article was received on 17 June 2020.
[Editor's opinion. This article is intended but fails to exonerate CM Abdul Rahman Yakub from the crime of grand robbery of Sarawak resources perpetrated on the Sarawak people.
After the fraudulent misrepresentation was exposed by Sabah Chief Ministers Tun Mustapha and Faud Stephens refusal to accept the paltry 5%, respectively, CM Rahman did not immediately terminate the Agreement but became an accomplice to the crime. He and his government
The extract reveals the Malayan federalists’ shocking dishonesty and total lack of good faith in their dealings with Sarawak and Sabah in observing MA63 terms was extended to the Petroleum Development Act 1974 & negotiations to sign the Petronas agreement on Sarawak & Sabah petroleum resources.
Neither Sarawak nor Sabah oil & gas ownership was a subject of MA63 negotiations as was done by the Malayans in their unsuccessful negotiations with Brunei in 1963.
This means that Malaya had no right to seize their territorial seas resources. Tun Razak was informed of the legal advice obtained by the Sarawak gov’t that the PDA74 was unconstitutional & illegal and unenforceable. It was therefore necessary to obtain the agreement of both Borneo states to exploit their resources.
Tun Razak & Tan Siew Sin deliberately misrepresented that Sabah had agreed with the 5% cash payment when it had not. This convinced CM Rahman to sign the agreement.
If PDA74 had abrogated Sarawak petroleum ownership then what was the need for Sarawak to make the Petronas agreement?
An agreement which was fraudulently made is null and void and unenforceable.
The facts were known after the fraud was committed. The Sarawak government did not immediately terminate the agreement to prevent the robbery of Sarawak’s valuable assets and therefore knowingly acquiesced to and compromised state rights. So it became an accomplice in the crime and even continues to betray the people.
Under the watch of Kuala Lumpur, the Rahman/Taib Mahmud family went on to commit grand robbery of the people's land and timber resources.]
apa cmf cakap ni kaka setuju walaupun tak faham, sebab serawak dan sabah lagi besar dari size semenanjung. telaga minyak pun banyak kat serawak.
moga ada timbang rasa kepada serawak dan sabah. mereka pun rakyat malaysia juga. bukan cm sis vokuru rumah atas sempadan kejap ngaku thailand kejap ngaku malaysia
Terdapat kecenderungan untuk menyamakan Sabah, Sarawak sama dengan Melaka dan Pulau Pinang, atauSabah, Sarawak hanya sama status seperti negeri-negeri lain.
Contohnya dalam isu minyak. Ramai pihak mempertikaikan tindakan Sabah, Sarawak berhubung tuntutan kerana mereka menyamakan kedudukan Sabah, Sarawak sama dengan Kelantan, Terangganu.
Sebenar salah.
Semasa pembentukan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu 1957, semua perlembagaan negeri perlu dipinda berdasarkan format Jadual ke (? ) dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan.
Namun, Semasa pembentukan Malaysia 1963, perlembagaan Sabah, Sarawak dirangka dan diluluskan oleh UK (Ini bermakna, Parlimen tidak boleh menceroboh Perlembagaan Sabah, Sarawak)
hanya Perlembagaan Sabah, Sarawak sahaja yang diiktiraf sebagaia supreme, sama status dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan
Selain itu, hanya Kerajaan Persekutuan, Sabah, Sarawak sahaja yang ada capasiti berhubung pemilikan aset. Peruntukan ini tidak dimiliki oleh negeri lain.
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
Tidak kurang juga yang menggunakan status Sabah, Sarawak sebagai jajahan British untuk menyamakan kedudukan Sabah Sarawak dengan Melaka dan Pulau Pinang
Mungkin ramai yang tidak tahu Malaysia ini diwujudkan berdasarkan Resolusi 1541 UN di mana Malaysia adalah wilayah amanah, dan semenanjung adalah sebagai pemegang amanah ke atas Sabah, Sarawak.
British juga berada di Sabahm Sarawak atas kapasiti sebagai pemegang amanah. Apabila Malaysia ditubuhkan, Semenanjung, telah mengambil alih tugas British sebagai pemegang amanah.
Walaupun teknikal, Sabahm Sarawak berstatus jajahan semasa pentadbiran British, namun British tertakluk kepada mandat amanah. Contohnya, dalam OMO (Sarawak lebih awal memiliki Ordinan sendiri berhubung minyak dan gas sebelum wujudnya PDA 1974)-Penguasaan Raja UK terhadap sumber Sarawak iaitu O&G adalah tertakluk kepada sistem amanah.
Walaupun Sarawak itu jajahan British, namun, British sendiri tidaak boleh suka2 buat sarawak itu betul2 seperti sebuah jajahan.
Klausa ini adalah hanya dimiliki oleh Sabah, Sarawak-yang mana-kerajaan Persekutuan perlu menyerahkan kembali semua fungsi Persekutuan selama ini kepada Sabah, Sarawak-sama ada secara beperingkat atau sekaligus. Eg pendidikan, kesihatan dan mana-mana lain yang dipegang oleh Persekutuan-kecuali ketenteraan/keselamatan dan hubungan antarabangsa...
Kuasa imigresen yang dimiliki oleh Sabah, Sarawak adalah sebagai ganti kepada hubungan antabangsa Sabah, Sarawak yang diserahkan kepada Persekutuan
Cuma tengak Laporan IGC ini:
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
Kesimpulan, walaupun sekarang Persekutuan memegang kuasa beberapa perkara-namun apabila melibatkan Sabah, Sarawak, kuasa tersebut adalah bersyarat. Malahan kuasa tersebut perlu diserahkan kepada Sabah, Sarawak untuk proses autonomi.
Mana-mana undang-undang sedia ada di Sabah, Sarawak, Parlimen tidak boleh masuk campur-atau meminta untuk diselaraskan dengan Persekutuan, selagi Sabah, Sarawak ingin menguatkuasakan undang-undang tersebut, walaupun berbeza dengan Persekutuan
Walaupun sejak 16 September 1963 pendidikan dan kesihatan bawah kuasa Persekutuan, namun hanya pada tahun 70an sahaja Sabah, Sarawak baru bersetuju untuk menyerahkannya kepada Persekutuan.
Malahan, sekarang, Sabah, Sarawak merancang untuk mengambil balik bidang pendidikan dan kesihatan dan diletakkan dibawah kuasa mereka
inilah antara janji British sebagai pemegang amanah untuk menyerahkan semua sumber alam bagi tujuan pemilikan kepada Kerajaan Sarawak....sumber tersebut diktiraf sebagai millik rakyat Sarawak dan perlu diserahkan kepada mereka
British menunaikan janji mereka apabila semua aset. termasuk pemilikan tanah dan sumbernya, diserahkan kepada Sarawak yang termaktud dalam Perlembagaan Sarawak. Sama juga untuk sabah
Ada la sebabnya kepada Perlembagaan Sabah, Sarawak dirangka dan diluluskan oleh UK semasa pembentukan Malaysia-ini bermakna, Parlimen Malaysia tidak boleh menyentuhkan Perlembagaan Sabah, Sarawak.
Logiknya, mudah-Sabah, Sarawak adalah wilayah luar yang kemudian bergabung dengan Persekutuan Malaya untuk membentuk Malaysia...entititi Sabah, Sarawak adalah sama seperti Persekutuan Tanah Melayu, bukan seperti Melaka, N9, Selangor etc.
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
Dalam kes Petronas ini, walaupun Perlembagaan Persekutuan cakap-pembangunan O&G bawah persekutua, bukan bermakna Persekutuan boleh buka suka hati seperti sebelum ini.
Perlembagaan Persekutuan sendiri cakap, Sabah, Sarawak berhak menerim royalti minyak-ini bermakna-Perlembagaan Persekutuan mengesaahkan minyak dan gas itu milik Sabah, Sarawak.
sama juga Perlembagaan cakap-Sabah, Sarawak boleh kutip cukai SST dari produk petrokimia...
Kalau Sabah, Sarawak tidak puas hati dengan Petronas, Sabah, Sarawak ada hak untuk ambil alih pembangunan O&G dari Petronas-dan menubuhkan syarikat sendiri.
Ramai juga yang tidak dapat membezakan Sovereignty vs sovereign rights.
Memandangkan Sabah, Sarawak dalam Malaysia-dan Keselamatan/Kenteraan antara wajib bawah PersekutuaN-memang Persekutuan mempunyai kuasa ke atas sovereignty perairan Sabah, Sarawak.
Namun, sovereign rights iaitu hak2 terhadap pemilikan sumber dan wilayah..masih lagi milik Sabah, Sarawak dan Sabah, Sarawak tidak pernah menyerahkan kepada Persekutuan....
Ramai yang tidak tahu, Sarawak muncul sebuah wilayah berstatus negara yang berdaulat bermula pada 1841 dan menjalinkan hubungan diplomatik dengan negara luar.
Status Sarawak sebagai sebuah negara telah digantung pada tahun 1946, apabila Sarawak diserahkan kepada British, dimana kedaulatan Sarawak sebagai sebuah negara diserahkan kepada British sebagai pemegang amanah.
namun, ini tidak bermakna Sarawak telah kehilangan hak untuk mendapatkan kembali status sebuah negara...kedaulatan tersebut masih ada-sebelum ini dipegang oleh British, sekarang dipegang oleh Malaysia ...sebagai pemegang amanah yang baru berdasarkan Resolusi 1541 UN.
sama juga untuk Sabah.
Walaupun status Sabah,Sarawak sekarang bukan berstatus sebuah negara seperti Brunei...namun Sabah, Sarawak juga tidak boleh disamakan dengan negeri-negeri lain dlm Malaysia.
Sama seperti Persekutuaan Malaya yang memiliki kedaulatan, Sabah, Sarawak juga memilik kedaulatan tersendiri yang sekarang ini diamanahkan kepada Malaysia...
Sabah, Sarawak tetap miliki kuasa imigresen sebagai ganti hub. antarabangsa Sabah, Sarawak diserahkan kepada Persekutuan.
- Dia menerangkan bagaimana cadangan awal struktur dan rundingan, Royalti Minyak antara Kerajaan Negeri dan Pusat.
- Hakmilik MinyakSummary
- The Interview was conducted in Bahasa Malaysia- He explained how the initial oil royalty structured between federal and states government.
- He gave example on how and what past tin companies had been doing to the country's reserves.
- He again stressed, for the benefit of the country and rakyat, that Petronas must control and manage oil and gas resources properly.
- He had hoped that, with proper training, our own citizen should be given a role to take part and perform in the oil & gas and other related industry as well, not just a spectator.
Sabah, Sarawak tidak membantah peranan Petronas untuk membangunkan industri O&G..MMg tercatat dalam Perlembagaan
Namun-apa yang berlaku selama ini adalah hak pemilikan O&G itu dirampas dari Sabah, Sarawak
Dah la dirampas, pembagian hasil pun nampak sangat tidak beretika.
royalti xde, sebaliknya diganti dengan bayaran tunai. bila dapat royalti-anda juga berhak dapat dividen.
dari 660b keuntungan Petronas di Sarawak, hanya 33 b diserahkan kpd Sarawak -selebihnya semua diangkut ke Malaya.
Lebih baik Sabah, Sarawak bagi lesen kt mana-manan syarikat minyak lain eg seperti Brunei-cukai dapat, royalti dapat,dividen dapat...bebanding dengan petronas yg hanya bg wang ehsan
kalau Sabah, Sarawak tidak setuju dengan idea kewujudan Petronas-Sabah, Sarawak dan ikut jejak Brunei..dan memilih opsyen merdeka sebagai sebuah negera sendiri..
apa yg berlaku selama ini, kerajaan Persekutuan telah menyalah gunakan perintah darurat-untuk merampas pemilikan minyak sabah, sarawak...
seterusnya hak Sabah, Sarawak untuk memdapat keuntungan hasil minyak secara adil telah diketepikan eg royalti, dividen, cukai etc..dimana semuanya dibolot oleh Persekutuan
bayangkan..perintah darurat untuk rusuhan kaum 13 mei 1969...hanya dimansukan pada 2012....? berpuluh tahun kemudian baru mansuh..x lain x bukan...untuk tujuan bolot keuntungan dan menafikan hak sabah srwk
ada suara sinis--sabah, sarawak x sedar diri-merempat datang cari keja ke Malaya...
untuk makluman-kebanyakan projek mega-semuanya pakai duit minyak sabah, sarawak..
cara smenanjung memajukan ekonomi-dengan mencekik Sabah, Sarawak melalui dasar cabotaj
Dari mana kerajaan boleh menarik FDI datang melabur sekitar tahun 80an-90an ke lembah kelang--kalau tidak menggunakan duit cukai-yang sepatutnya LHDN kembalikan kepada Sabah, Sarawak untuk pembangunaN.
Namun, apa yang berlaku adalah sebaliknya--semua cukai LHDN untuk Sabah, Sarawak diambil oleh Persekutuan untuk membangunakn semnanjung..
Kalau nak kira jumlah tunggakan sejak tahun 1964-dah cecah trilion hutang Persekutuan dengan Sabah, Sarawak tentang cukai LHDN...
jadi x payah nak sindir2 penduduk Sabah, Sarawak yang ramai cari keja di Malaya..
Post time 27-6-2020 06:35 PM
变色卡
Author
![[tvN/Netflix 2024] QUEEN OF TEARS - Kim Soo Hyun, Kim Ji Won, Park Sung Hoon](https://uf.cari.com.my/forumx/mforum/block/f6/f613b76788751ed27a22bff90355c844.jpg)
