JAWATAN KOSONG! Jadi penulis freelance kami dan berpeluang menang hadiah wang tunai berjumlah RM300! Klik sini > CARI Warrior
Chinese
Color
Orange
Black
Blue
Purple
Green
Deep Blue
Laman Utama
Forum
Fokus
Semasa
Gosip Socmed
Kolumnis
Search
103541
View
343
Reply

Japan JSDF ''Jieitai'' and Police/Coast Guard Gallery and Discussion

[Copy link]

Author: HangPC2       Show all posts   Read mode

Author
Post time 25-8-2006 02:28 PM | Show all posts |Read mode
Shinshin Project



Northrop-Mitsubishi F3 (F-36A US) Affordable Interceptor

Japanese F-3 to provide design for USN F-36 program


Sources

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachmen...achmentid=87942

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachmen...chmentid=132932

ATD-X

http://www.jda-trdi.go.jp/topics.html

The links above are to an advanced technology trainer that is strangely similar and is a real project.







[ Last edited by  HangPC2 at 28-9-2007 12:52 AM ]

Rate

1

View Rating Log

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 25-8-2006 04:12 PM | Show all posts
very nice project indeed..
the return of "the rising sun"..
in fact, jietai sedang dikaji semula peranannya di jepun..
ramai rakyat jepun sokong diubah term2 JSDF
supaya jadi angkatan tentera macam negara2 lain..
sama masa WW2..
dasar "pandang ke timur" zaman Dr. M patut direfresh balik..
cover sekali military cooperation..
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 25-8-2006 10:12 PM | Show all posts
Japan Self-Defense Forces (Jieitai) Recruitment POSTER







































Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 25-8-2006 10:37 PM | Show all posts
JSDF 2006 Calendar



Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 25-8-2006 11:32 PM | Show all posts
Dang their military promotional posters kinda sucks like ours.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 26-8-2006 12:05 AM | Show all posts
The US gorv. force the Japan gorv. cant update ther F2 n create there new plane, if japan gorv. want to continues ,the US military will not giving support to Japan military update there plane and weapons, so the Japan just cancel all the project. And the other reason is the budget is to high.
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 26-8-2006 11:32 AM | Show all posts
JSDF Mission In Iraq

Military Gear



























[ Last edited by  HangPC2 at 26-8-2006 02:54 PM ]
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 26-8-2006 03:02 PM | Show all posts
JSDF Mission In Iraq

JSDF Medical Battalion











Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 26-8-2006 03:16 PM | Show all posts
JSDF Mission In Iraq

JSDF Engineering Battalion















Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 26-8-2006 03:29 PM | Show all posts
JSDF Mission In Iraq

JSDF Army Vehicle



















Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 26-8-2006 03:38 PM | Show all posts
JSDF Mission In Iraq

JSDF Camp













Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 27-8-2006 10:41 PM | Show all posts
Japan naval open day (1)





Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 27-8-2006 10:41 PM | Show all posts
Japan naval open day (2)





Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 27-8-2006 10:42 PM | Show all posts
Japan naval open day (3)









source from: http://jczs.news.sina.com.cn/bbs/2006/0827/16427863.html
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 29-8-2006 11:40 AM | Show all posts
JSDF Military Watch






Kentex S294X-JGR JGSDF












Kentex S332M-JSI JMSDF
















Kentex S481M-JBL JASDF














Kentex S445M-JBL JASDF Blue Impulse









Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 31-8-2006 12:10 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by HangPC2 at 25-8-2006 02:28 PM
Northrop-Mitsubishi F3 (F-36A US) Affordable Interceptor

Japanese F-3 to provide design for USN F-36 program

Sources

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachmen...achmentid=87942

http:/ ...


apesal aku tgk byk negara luar suka tiru design u.s,cam raptor je aku tgk..China pun cam2 gak.diorang ni dah ketandusan idea agaknye..klu nak, aku ada design aku sendiri tapi aku simpan khas untuk malaysia..hehe
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 1-9-2006 09:03 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by BeachBoys at 31-8-2006 12:10 AM


apesal aku tgk byk negara luar suka tiru design u.s,cam raptor je aku tgk..China pun cam2 gak.diorang ni dah ketandusan idea agaknye..klu nak, aku ada design aku sendiri tapi aku simpan khas un ...


bukan tiru tapi reka betuk lebih kurang sebab sudah diuji jimat perbelanjaan untuk R&D
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 2-9-2006 12:13 PM | Show all posts
JSDF Rank ''Kaikiu''




JGSDF Rank



General



Lieutenant General



Major General



Colonel



Lieutenant Colonel



Major



Captain



First Lieutenant



Second Lieutenant



Warrant Officer



Sergeant Major



Master Sergeant



Sergeant First Class



Sergeant



Leading Private



Private First Class



Private



Recruit






http://www.jda.go.jp/jgsdf/english/rank_e/rank_e.html

http://www.jda.go.jp/jgsdf/english/index_e.html

[ Last edited by  HangPC2 at 2-9-2006 12:46 PM ]
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 2-9-2006 01:48 PM | Show all posts


















































Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 2-9-2006 02:23 PM | Show all posts
































Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 2-9-2006 06:15 PM | Show all posts
Fuji AH-1S Cobra (JGSDF)









































Last edited by HangPC2 on 28-3-2013 09:29 PM

Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 4-9-2006 01:48 PM | Show all posts
Yes NATO... But NAATO?



By Jason Miks :  BIO| 01 Aug 2006

TOKYO -- Three years ago there were reports of discussions between US and Indian officials about the possibility of creating an Asian version of NATO. Indeed, Professor Madhav Nalapat, an influential adviser to the Indian government who was reported to be involved in the talks, even went as far as suggesting the name NAATO, for the North America-Asia Treaty Organization.

Over the next several months there was some discussion about the merits and drawbacks of such an organisation. But with the US forced to focus its attention on events in Iraq and then Iran's nuclear program, the issue largely disappeared from view.

Yet in the three years following these talks, the need for an Asian security body is in some ways even clearer than it was then. There is continued instability in Afghanistan, China continues a military build-up that is still shrouded in secrecy and North Korea defied international, and more interestingly Chinese pressure, in launching seven missiles earlier this month.

In the absence of a NATO-like entity the region relies for security co-operation on a number of useful, but still fairly limited, groupings such as the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF).

ASEAN, whose foreign ministers meet in Kuala Lumpur this week, was formed in 1967 by Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Singapore -- largely in an act of defiance of communism. It has since been joined by five more members, but unlike an organization like the EU, it is not so much interested in treaties and other legal frameworks as a consensual approach to decision making. This has allowed it to survive as group, and has even provided some genuine successes such as agreement on free trade. But the reluctance to integrate or intervene in regional matters restricts effective security co-ordination. Indeed the limitations of the ASEAN model were clear during the crisis over East Timor and are reflected in the association's approach to terrorism, which fails to really commit its members to any specific responsibilities.

Perhaps in recognition of these constraints defense ministers from the ASEAN nations announced in May their intention to contribute to the establishment of an ASEAN security community (ASC) to, in their words, 'bring ASEAN's political and security cooperation to a higher plane'. However, again, while the ASC is a step forward in co-operation it is likely to eschew any kind of defense pact, alliance or united foreign policy, thus placing continued restraints on its ability to meet regional challenges demanding a quick response.

The other arena for security co-operation is the 25 member ARF, which met for the first time in 1994, and which includes ASEAN members and other key players such as the US, EU, Japan and China. As with ASEAN it aims for a gradualist approach, though it does provide an opportunity for high-level meetings and allows for the type of regional identity which could be a pre-cursor towards an alliance.

While such confidence-building is of course welcome, it does not provide for the binding treaties that would oblige greater transparency on issues such as defense.

This reluctance to integrate -- due largely to issues of trust and sovereignty -- is a large barrier to an Asian NATO. This is a point Brad Glosserman, Executive Director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies' Pacific Forum, made to me recently when I asked his view on the possibility of creating such an entity. He believes that at present there is insufficient agreement on security threats and how best to address them for such an organisation to be viable in the near future, and argues that it would risk antagonizing countries like China which might choose not to be involved.

All of which is a shame. The region could benefit from greater co-ordination and transparency. It is riddled with rivalries, many still simmering from the Second World War, and there are a host of territorial disputes that provide potential flashpoints. The benefits of more integrated defense planning would perhaps help dissipate some of these tensions and ease concerns over countries like Japan, which are hoping to play a more active role in defense. Allowing Asian nations to address more concerns themselves might also ease the kind of suspicions of 'outsiders' which were evident when Australia dispatched forces to East Timor.

And such an alliance would certainly be preferable to the group of regimes that have linked up under the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation. The SCO was formed in 2001 and includes Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Russia and China; it has also cozied up to Iran, which hopes to become a full member.

Asia might not yet be ready for a full-fledged military alliance, but that is no reason not to at least consider the possibility of one for the future. In a sometimes troubled part of the world, the extra trust it would engender would be welcome.

Jason Miks is a Tokyo-based writer and Assistant Editor at the Center for International Relations.

http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=080106A
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 12-9-2006 09:32 PM | Show all posts
baju camo JSDF hampir sama dengan baju camo german ?????
Reply

Use magic Report

Author
 Author| Post time 21-9-2006 10:29 AM | Show all posts
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-9-2006 01:38 PM | Show all posts
bertukar......... jiiizzzzzzzzzzz
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register | Facebook Login

Points Rules

 CARI App
Get it FREE Apple App Store
Get it FREE Google play
 Instagram
cari_infonet
FOLLOW
Copyright © 1996-2019 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd All Rights Reserved(483575-W)
2.429732s Gzip On
Quick Reply To Top Return to the list