THE JURY FOUND YOU...

eymirsya · Post time 20-5-2017 10:15 PM

innocent until proven guilty

anikarma · Post time 23-5-2017 02:54 PM

Supposed to be innocent till proven guilty.

nut.legacy · Post time 27-7-2017 02:38 PM

innocent until proven guilty..

BalangMerah · Post time 29-7-2017 04:02 PM

For sure

Innocent untill proven guilty..

Castorsugar · Post time 29-7-2017 06:14 PM

Innocnt utill provn guilty...
The prosecution has to present evidence so convincing that it proves you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If your attorney shows that enough doubt exists, you can be acquitted.

noiz_phayz · Post time 7-8-2017 10:24 AM

Innocent until proven guilty.
Ada pro and cons jugak. Kalau dalam makhamah tak dapat nak sabitkan kesalahan disebabkan bukti dismissed atau tak cukup, memang pesalah boleh terlepas. But still makhamah dunia la, mahkamah akhirat takkan boleh terlepas.

CamCamry1 · Post time 7-8-2017 10:53 AM

innocent until proven guilty.. dari segi perundangan, org yg dituduh atau didakwa mempunyai hak untuk diperdengarkan kesnya di mahkamah dan membuktikan dirinya tidak bersalah.. dia didakwa di mahkamah oleh pendakwa berdasarkan bukti2 atau keterangan yg disiasat oleh pihak polis. so mahkamah tidak boleh terus menjatuhkan hukum berdasarkan bukti yg ada, perlu ada perbicaraan yg adil melibatkan kedua2 belah pihak pendakwaan dan pihak pembelaan kerana pd mata mahkamah yg dituduh itu hanya dituduh shj, belum dibuktikan sepenuhnya yg dia mmg bersalah. x adil kalo dgr sebelah pihak kan? dlm kes jenayah contohnya, tertuduh perlu buktikan kpd mahkamah yg dia tak buat jenayah tu. pemberat utk pembuktian terletak di tgn pihak pembelaan. tak semua yg dituduh tu betul2 melakukan kesalahan, ada yg kena frame, ada yg berada di tempat dan pada masa yg salah, ada yg ikut arahan org lain.. so, kita sebgai public x bleh terus menghukum org yg ditangkap utk siasatan atau dituduh, kita x tahu cerita dia sebenarnya sama ada dia tu real culprit atau pun x..

CamCamry1 · Post time 7-8-2017 11:06 AM

seribulan replied at 20-1-2017 07:44 AM
Kalo yang tak bersalah tu rupanya bersalah? Macam filem jagged edge tu?

kes serial killer ke... ...

mahkamah membuat kputusan berasaskan bukti2 oleh kedua2 belah pihak.. mmg ada kes pnjenayah dibebaskan oleh kesilapan teknikal atau x cukup bukti.. tp tu bukan bermakna sistem kehakiman kita corrupt atau polis or pendakwaan kita corrupt, mereka dah mnjalankn tugas sebaiknya. pnjenayah skrg ni smua bijak pandai kambus tutup bukti.. mcammana skalipun hakim x boleh jatuhkan hukuman tanpa asas.. kita fikir mcm ni je, spandai2 tupai melompat, akhirnya jatuh ke tanah jua.. even kalo dia trlepas kat sini, akhirat blun tentu..

farleo · Post time 7-8-2017 07:56 PM

No.2... kene tgk evidence etc... br blh decide...

peccan · Post time 8-8-2017 08:36 AM

sy pilih no .2

innocent until proven guilty

freax.ize · Post time 8-8-2017 08:55 AM

Definately, innocent until proven guilty...
"The burden of proof is on the claimant and an oath is an obligation upon him who denies".

tigerlily1010 · Post time 10-8-2017 10:20 PM

Innocent until proven guilty

Dalam Universal Declaration of Human Rights pun sdh tertulis

Article 11.

(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Pihak pendakwaan perlu buktikan yg tertuduh benar2 bersalah