Hamina class missile boats

gancity · Post time 18-5-2007 11:15 PM

Hamina class missile boats

photos from: http://bbs.news.sina.com.cn/?h=/g_forum/00/04/03/view.php%3Ffid%3D33582%26tbid%3D207&g=1

The Hamina class missile boats (Finnish: Hamina-luokan ohjusvene) are a type of vessel in use by the Finnish Navy.
It is also known as Rauma 2000 following its predecessor the Rauma class.
The Hamina is generally designated as a "fast attack craft", but because of the connotation of aggression in that name,
the Finnish Defence Forces prefers names such as "fast patrol craft" or "fast surface combatant".
Nevertheless the Hamina packs a deadly force. Its aluminium/composite structure is designed with stealth in mind and
equipped with latest in radar technology. It has electronically integrated combat management systems including equipment
for electronic warfare. Modernized MTO-85m Surface-to-surface missiles and the Umkhonto Surface-to-air missiles provide
the bulk of the crafts combat capability.When all of the four vessels are finished they will form what the navy calls
Squadron 2000 (Finnish: Laivue 2000). The navy went through severals plans on the combination of this squadron.
At one point only two Hamina class vessels and four Tuuli class ACV were to be built.
Due to the changes in the tasks of the Finnish Navy, the composition of the Squadron 2000 was changed.
The successful prototype of Tuuli has never been fully equipped nor taken to operational use,
instead of three more HCs planned total of four Hamina-class has been built. The fourth and final Hamina class ship was
delivered in summer 2006.The squadron should reach its full operative capability in 2008 and will greatly
improve the surface- and air patrol as well as air defense capacity. It will also increase the quality of information
available for military leaders.

General specifications
Designation: Fast Attack Craft - Missile
Displacement: 250 tons
Dimensions:
Length: 51 m
Width: 8.5 m
Draft: 1.7 m
Main engines: 2 * MTU 16V 538 TB93 diesels; 6600 kW
Propulsion: 2 * Kamewa 90SII waterjets
Speed: 30+ knots
Range: 500 miles
Armament:
1 * Bofors 40 mm/70 Sea Trinity (Bofors 57 mm/70 SAK Mk3 on Hanko & Tornio. Hamina will be retro-fitted))
2 * NSV 12,7 mm MGs
8-cell Denel Umkhonto-IR VLS SAM system
4 * Saab RBS-15 Mk3 SSM (2 * Sako twin-barrel 23 mm/87 (modified ZU-23-2) can be fitted instead of missiles)
4 * Saab Elma LLS-920 9-tube ASW mortars
1 rail for depth charges or mines (Sea Mine 2000)
Countermeasures:
Decoys: Philax chaff and IR flares
Smoke system: Lacroix ATOS
EMS: Thales Matilda radar warning system
Electronics:
Rheinmetall MASS (Multi Ammunition Soft-kill System)
Saab Ceros-200 FCS
EADS TRS-3D/16-ES multimode acquisition 3D radar
EADS ANCS 2000 Combat Management System
EADS MSSR 2000 I IFF
SAGEM EOMS
Simrad Subsea Toadfish sonar
Finnyards Sonac/PTA towed array sonar
Crew: 26
Yard: Aker Finnyards Rauma, Finland

NamePennantBuilderOrderedLaid downLaunchedCommissionedHome portStatusFinnish NavyHamina80 (ex-74)Aker FinnyardsDecember, 1996August 24, 1998 UpinniemiActiveTornio81Aker FinnyardsFebruary 15, 2001May 12, 2003UpinniemiActiveHanko82Aker FinnyardsDecember 3, 2003June 22, 2005UpinniemiActivePori83Aker FinnyardsFebruary 15, 2005June 19, 2006UpinniemiActive
source from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamina_class_missile_boat

a good ship for TLDM replace thier old fast attack Missile boat.. if TLDM plan to replace it la

... is a nice and fast attack boat

razhar · Post time 19-5-2007 03:13 AM

kalu ada niat nak moden kan,lain le kalu duk pakai ayat 'kapal sekarang masih mampu'...

eontect · Post time 19-5-2007 12:01 PM

Aku sokong...tunggu sampai dah berlubang baru nak beli..ke..

hyazinth79 · Post time 6-8-2007 10:12 AM

kita punya kapal kelas FAC dah umur berapa ha

Canaletto · Post time 6-8-2007 10:15 AM

FAC's banyak dibeli sekitar tahun 60'an dan 70'an. Separuh FAC's ni pun dah ditransfer dan ditauliahkan dlm MMEA.

hyazinth79 · Post time 6-8-2007 10:31 AM

makna nye kene la ganti , buat macam nuri aritu , dah terhempas baru nak ganti

alien7749 · Post time 6-8-2007 04:02 PM

kene tgg bot tenggelam dulu la

xcentric · Post time 6-8-2007 04:12 PM

jangan lah kita dihidangkan dengan berita sedih saja kalau melibatkan Pasukan Keselamatan...

tin · Post time 6-8-2007 04:22 PM

boleh... lu pakat la dgn warga TLDM untuk tenggelamkan FAC yang ada. kantoi kalu, naya...

kimyee73 · Post time 6-8-2007 05:19 PM

Do we need to replace our old FAC with another FAC? TLDM should look for bigger craft, more NGPV or corvettes. Good seakeeping than FAC, suitable for patroling facing south china sea.

areguard · Post time 6-8-2007 08:17 PM

Setuju sangat..FAC ni kurang stabil bila dilambung ombak sea state 2 atau 3 mcm kat Laut china tu...boleh sampai muntah hijau kalau tak kena gaya...baiklah upgrade dgn platform lebh besar kelas OPV...selesa utk anak kapal menjalankan tugas...

tangopapa · Post time 6-8-2007 11:24 PM

Lu allocate la budget utk navy beli OPV baru....

macam tak biasa plak, lu kluarkan llocation utk beli barang tsunami, lepas tu kontra ngan supplier bekal beras c/w OPV...

areguard · Post time 7-8-2007 11:44 AM

Originally posted by tangopapa at 6-8-2007 11:24 PM
Lu allocate la budget utk navy beli OPV baru.... macam tak biasa plak, lu kluarkan llocation utk beli barang tsunami, lepas tu kontra ngan supplier bekal beras c/w OPV...

Permohonan peruntukan untuk penggantian FAC tersebut akan dipertimbangkan di bawah Rancangan Malaysia Ke-10 sebab peruntukan pertahanan untuk Navy dan APMM telah komited...Sekian sedia maklum...

Burung_hantu · Post time 7-8-2007 04:07 PM

Agak2 berapa harga sebiji FAC ni?

gancity · Post time 7-8-2007 10:48 PM

i thk tis FAC very deadly it may no as big as our NGPV but it still bigger than our existing FAC...and it alot faster than our NGPV even our Lekiu class...

jazim · Post time 8-8-2007 11:35 AM

Setuju. Skang ni peperangan littoral kemabli gemilang dan kapal2 bersaiz FAC memang perlu!

wzhtg · Post time 8-8-2007 06:07 PM

I think this FAC is a very good option to replace our existing FACs which are getting pretty old and are in need of replacing. It's first advantage is no doubt it's speed which would make it faster then both our NGVP and our Lekius. Plus we most like can get it in bigger quantity then our NGVPs. Even though quality is important, so is quantity which I think is usually lacking in our procerment. Plus, this FAC seems to be even more well armed then our NVGPs right now, unless our NGVPs are further upgraded to include arms, this FAC would be a very good choice. In fact, I had acutally hoped that our NGVPS would be equiped with Umkhonto Surface-to-air missiles . For me we should try as much as possible to ensure that our NGVPs fully armed so as to fully exploit their true potential.

Robotech · Post time 8-8-2007 06:30 PM

Acquiring new vessels for RMN may take another decade to be realised. The Govt. has been on the spending spree for RMN cause, so at most,what we will see is the completion of 4 NGPVs project & hopefully the resuming works for another 21 vessels as fund permitted.

tangopapa · Post time 9-8-2007 12:41 AM

Originally posted by areguard at 7-8-2007 11:44 AM

Permohonan peruntukan untuk penggantian FAC tersebut akan dipertimbangkan di bawah Rancangan Malaysia Ke-10 sebab peruntukan pertahanan untuk Navy dan APMM telah komited...Sekian sedia maklum ...

Kastam ngan APMM sesuai pakai hamina nih buat masa sekarang....buat trial dulu sebijik dua....klu rokok gudang garam haram x de kat pasaran atau PATI dah x de kat chow kit...baru boleh pertimbang beli 100 bijik utk NAVY...