CARI Infonet

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

Author: gancity

Russian Armed Forces Gallery And Discussion Thread

  [Copy link]
 Author| Post time 13-10-2006 09:24 AM | Show all posts

Reply #11 mat_toro's post

they put in Taiwan? tis i not sure as i know onli they put alot fighter jet at foregin country...by the way matador may not affect out PT-91M
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


mat_toro This user has been deleted
Post time 13-10-2006 09:38 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by gancity at 13-10-2006 09:24 AM
they put in Taiwan? tis i not sure as i know onli they put alot fighter jet at foregin country...by the way matador may not affect out PT-91M


They don't have enough land to store them...

Matador may not have effect??  And the basis of this claim is??
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 13-10-2006 09:56 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by mat_toro at 13-10-2006 09:21 AM
Singapore dont invest in tanks?? are you claiming all the Challenger/Chieftain Class tanks you guys put in Taiwan are sold off as scrap already??  Singapore has no tanks??



Those are old Centurion tanks lah. bought 2nd hand long time ago. Not chieftain or Challenger.
We just upgrade our light AMX13s to kill tanks and for close field  firepower.
In other words, hardly any investments into battle tanks.
Reply

Use magic Report

mat_toro This user has been deleted
Post time 13-10-2006 10:20 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by Debmey at 13-10-2006 09:56 AM



Those are old Centurion tanks lah. bought 2nd hand long time ago. Not chieftain or Challenger.
We just upgrade our light AMX13s to kill tanks and for close field  firepower.
In other word ...


aiyahh... thanks for correcting me... I knew it was Brit model but forgot which type

But tanks still have their relevancy on open terrain...
maybe not for singapore's terrain which is why you don't need tanks in the first place... but our terrain still relevant...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 13-10-2006 11:28 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by gancity at 13-10-2006 09:24 AM
they put in Taiwan? tis i not sure as i know onli they put alot fighter jet at foregin country...by the way matador may not affect out PT-91M



I do not know the penetration power of Matador but since it is a new weapon, I think it can take on ERA. Its a very light and short weapon, great for infantry.
Reply

Use magic Report

mat_toro This user has been deleted
Post time 13-10-2006 11:42 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by Debmey at 13-10-2006 11:28 AM



I do not know the penetration power of Matador but since it is a new weapon, I think it can take on ERA. Its a very light and short weapon, great for infantry.


Is it a dedicated anti-armor or more towards anti-personnel??
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 13-10-2006 12:14 PM | Show all posts
anti personnel can use M203.
Reply

Use magic Report

mat_toro This user has been deleted
Post time 13-10-2006 12:22 PM | Show all posts

Reply #18 Debmey's post

203 have trouble clearing out bunkers... it's a projectile... not a rocket propelled armament... accuracy in combat and in a hurry also lousy... have to raise body to launch & expose yourself...
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 13-10-2006 12:53 PM | Show all posts


Some info about Matador..

http://www.mindef.gov.sg/weapons/matador/weapontalk.htm

the RAFAEL (Israeli) connection...

http://www.defense-update.com/directory/spike-sr.htm

[ Last edited by  ef/x at 13-10-2006 12:55 PM ]
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 01:12 AM | Show all posts
This trials story is nonsense.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 01:55 PM | Show all posts

kekuatan tentera rusia

ade sape2 tau tak kekuatan sebenar tentera rusia
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 02:06 PM | Show all posts
kekuatannya...terletak pada huruf 'R'........


sorry joking...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 02:36 PM | Show all posts
Kekuatan tentera Russia terletak kepada Strategic Missile Troop - kekuatan persenjataan misil yg dilengkapi persenjataan misil anti-pesawat udara, misil jarak dekat/ sederhana/, misil antara benua, misil taktikal nuklear.

Selain itu, kelebihan kuantiti dalam aset armor, artileri, udara & laut membolehkan Russia terus digeruni oleh negara lain, termasuk US.

Kekuatan Russia juga adalah keseluruhan  industri persenjataan yg mampu digerakpindah dlm masa yg singkat sekiranya berlaku sebarang konflik penaklukan ke tanahair Russia. Malahan, kelebihan Russia juga terletak kepada setiap anakwatan (lelaki & perempuan) yg boleh dikerah sepenuh masa untuk mempertahan 'Motherland'.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 06:47 PM | Show all posts
Walau macamana kuat pun Rusia ni, terkencit jugak pekena dengan pejuang Chechen...La ni Rusia dah nak bergocoh dengan Georgia pulak....Putin ..Putin
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 08:37 PM | Show all posts
hi


russia defence doctrine stated that the main objective to depend on :


1.large armed forces

2.modern and superb navy armanda

3.ballastic missile


i wonder where is russia main naval base in Vladivostok....still fuctioning well....


regards



zarul
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 08:46 PM | Show all posts
tapi kenape rusia ni tak agrasif macam us ek....klau rusia lebih menonjol mesti us tak berani nak buat macam2...
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 14-10-2006 09:29 PM | Show all posts

Reply #3 Robotech's post

whoaaa brader.. cantekkk avatar..  teringat zaman wa kecik-kecik dulu.. sikit-sikit main board rpg..  sikit-sikit cari protoculture cache keh keh keh..

sori off-topik kejap..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 09:30 PM | Show all posts
moscow has been checked from become superpower and its economic deteroting.

remember iraq 's armed forces is a small scale of russian amy and defeated by allied forces led by us during gulf war 1 &2.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 11:49 PM | Show all posts
kekuatannya terletak kepada 3 perkara:

1. Nuclear Deterrence
2. Communisme Influence
3. Big Arm dealer and supplier
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-10-2006 11:53 PM | Show all posts
Originally posted by iqbalpc at 14-10-2006 08:46 PM
tapi kenape rusia ni tak agrasif macam us ek....klau rusia lebih menonjol mesti us tak berani nak buat macam2...


coz, russia economical influence on the world market is very weak except for Arm dealings............therefore they dont have big capital as per USA.......

Russia should follow China in term of ecomomic strategies.......
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CARI Infonet

28-3-2024 11:10 PM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.708417 second(s), 41 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list