|
|
Tank baru Jepun. Berbeza daripada Type 90.
daripada n54 porem.
Weight: 44 tonnes
Length: 9.42 m
Width: 3.24 m
Height: N/A
Crew: 2 or 3 (commander/gunner, driver or丂commander, gunner, driver)
Armor: Modular ceramic composite armor
Primary armament: New 120mm smoothbore gun (maybe 120 mm/L44 or L50). built by Japan Steel Works, Ltd
Secondary armament: M2HB 12.7mm machine gun
Engine: 4 stroke cycle Diesel engine, possibly 1,500 hp
Suspension: Active suspension
Speed: 70 km/h
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cam perancis punya je design...lenrac kalau tak silap.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #1 belacan79's post
|
Kalo bwh 50 ton, lepas la jambatan2 kat Jepun tu... Musti murah skit drpd Type 90... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #2 razhar's post
lenrac? memang silap daa..leclerc daa..boley kata amalgamation of abrams+leo+leclerc..tapi xkan 44ton je..protection kureng? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ermmm .. mcm leopard jer .. mcm perancis punyer pun ader .. diorang buat sendiri tank nie ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kalau tak silap aku la kan kiter punyer tank pun berat lebih satu kan dari yg nie .. ruper pun ok gak .. naper la tak kuar awal2 ble masuk calon tank kiter sebab byk ciri2 yg kiter nak ader kat tank nie.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tank Canada Leapard 1 with new amor...hmmm...
[ Last edited by belacan79 at 15-2-2008 05:19 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #6 superhornet's post
|
jepun ada ke pasarkan diorang punya teknologi militari???? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #6 superhornet's post
|
Mahal ler kalo Msia nak beli, xckp budget defence... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #4 StealthTuah's post
Type 90 pon diorg ambil design drpd Leopard II, rasa nyer diorg pkemaskan lg design Type 90 n jdla tank baru nei...
Protection nyer xbbeza drpd Type 90 wlupon krg ton... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #7 belacan79's post
Woww !!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #9 yaminz's post
|
Takkan la mahal sangat kot banding ngan harga sebelah us n euro .. rasernyer ader kot .. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pakai diesel engine...? Tak reti buat turbine gas ke..?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rasanya gas tubine lbh ringan dari injin diesel....so advantage kat speed....betulkan kalau aku salah... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #15 matamata's post
|
Tu memang betul tak dinafikan tapi mungkin diorang fikir dari soal ketahanan dan kelasakan enjin tu serta kos nyer .. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #16 superhornet's post
|
Turbine gas lbh tahan...tak byk moving part....kalau tidak macamana kapal terbang nak terbang berpuluh2 jam tanpa henti..?. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tapikan....Jepun mesti ada sbb2 yang konkrit kenapa diaorg pakai injin diesel neh....takkan diaorg bodoh sgt kan....?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #18 matamata's post
|
mungkin salah satu sebab lagi adelah flash point of diesel......diesel x mudah terbakar sepertimana petrol dan gas... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kos? or turbin bagi heat signature kuat sangat .. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 15-2-2008 02:53 PM
变色卡
Author
