|
PETRA LOST, FOUND AND MUSLIM FORCE IN THE 7 century AD.
[Copy link]
|
|
Edited by sam1528 at 8-12-2018 12:41 PM
FOTHERMUCKER2 replied at 8-12-2018 11:30 AM
hahaha..lobai estate faham ke? BI lobai estate pun kelaut kekononya nak ajar FM2? hahaha cuba pergi cermin diri tu dahulu! low iq ada hati nak bagi tau FM2. clown CI nak ajar FM2 kekononya. mesti lobai estate gila...
Translation :
Aku lobai mat slow v2 memang dah belajar banyak dari sam1528
Aku dalam diam2 amat kagum dgn sam1528
Sebenarnya aku dok harap board KKK ni adalah board Isu Semasa pasal aku teruk kena belasah ka sini
Geng aku pon tak masuk tolong aku
Maklum lah aku , lobai mat slow v2 , amat2 kureng cerdik malah bodoh sampai ke tulang
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by FOTHERMUCKER2 at 8-12-2018 12:44 PM
Haha ternyata lobai estate terlalu bodoh untuk faham! Betulah iq samdol terlalu rendah tak boleh nak faham apa itu maksud CI. CI bermaksud forum Cari infonet ..ada board isu semasa ada board kkk ada board artist. Sedihnya dengan samdol terlalu bodoh
HAHAHAHA BOARD CARI ISSUE? Thei tambi kau betul bangang lah.
Sebab itu fm2 kata tahap pemahaman kau terlalu lembab low iq bodoh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'poooowww!!' - kena sebijik lagi
Sampai jalan pon dah mengengkang macam ni :
Terus lobai mat slow v2 jadik blur macam ni :
Lobai mat slow v2 dah pening :
hahahah...dah terang terang ada bagi tau
petra. ternyata lobai estate english kelaut!
betapa bodoh lembamnya lobai estate yang low iq dan tak faham english. islamic dah pernah conquest Petra bermula 629AD, waktu tu nabi masih hidup lagi! lobai estate biol ka kata nabi tak sempat tawan Petra?. Sebab itu FM2 kata lobai estate mulut besar otak kecil!
posting #8 https://mforum.cari.com.my/forum ... 34949&extra=&page=1untuk rujukan kat bawah ni
Christianity found its way to Petra in the 4th century CE, nearly 500 years after the establishment of Petra as a trade center. Athanasius mentions a bishop of Petra (Anhioch. 10) named Asterius. At least one of the tombs (the "tomb with the urn"?) was used as a church. An inscription in red paint records its consecration "in the time of the most holy bishop Jason" (447). After the Islamic conquest of 629–632 Christianity in Petra, as of most of Arabia, gave way to Islam. During the First Crusade Petra was occupied by Baldwin I of the Kingdom of Jerusalem and formed the second fief of the barony of Al Karak (in the lordship of Oultrejordain) with the title Chateau de la Valée de Moyse or Sela. It remained in the hands of the Franks until 1189. It is still a titular see of the Catholic Church. He he he he ... lobai mat slow v2 dlm kebodohan masih lagi klaim Petra kena tawan pada CE629
Rujukkan yilek ... oh yeah ko amat2 kurang fasih english pasal ko ingat ini catat Petra telah ditawan :
After the Islamic conquest of 629–632 Christianity in Petra, as of most of Arabia, gave way to Islam. Mana kat sentence tersebut kata Petra ditawan pada CE629 - 632?
Yg aki nak gelak , aku tak ada problem pasal ko masih lagi kantoi lah tambi ; ko buat klaim bodoh
Qibla pertama , islam bermula & Nabi Muhammad(saw) lahir kat Petra Lepas tu ko bagi pulak rujukkan yg ko dlm kebodohan ko , pahaman yg bodoh sekali kononnya Petra ditawan pada CE629
Ko konfom pulak
'...Christianity in Petra, ...'
Jadik hancur lebur klaim bodoh ko :
Qibla pertama , islam bermula & Nabi Muhammad(saw) lahir kat Petra He he he he ... every which way ko kalah tambi
Lagi sekali k konfom yg kat Petra kuat kristian & ikut kebodohan ko , hanya ditawan pada CE632
Masa tersebut mekkah dah establish epi centre of the muslim world
Nak cakap apa lagi tambi?
Macamana ko nak cakap pon ko kena balik lah tambi
Ko lah mamat yg paling paling paling bodoh kat Forum Cari ni
Kah kah kah ... lobai mat slow v2 masih terperangkap dgn rujukkan sendiri
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by sam1528 at 8-12-2018 02:07 PM
Senang aje jawab
Refer to post#133 dari aku
Tq ye support pendirian geng muslim : Last2 ko mengaku
KIBLAT PERTAMA (MENGIKUT FAHAMAN LOBAI) ORANG ISLAM MENGHALA KE JERUSALEM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by sam1528 at 8-12-2018 02:10 PM
Senang aje jawab
Refer to post#133 dari aku
Tq ye support pendirian geng muslim : Last2 ko mengaku
KIBLAT PERTAMA (MENGIKUT FAHAMAN LOBAI) ORANG ISLAM MENGHALA KE JERUSALEM Hancur lebur klaim bodoh ko
Qibla pertama , Islam bermula & Nabi Muhammad(saw) lahir kat Petra Kih kih kih
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hahahaha...lobai samdol keluar estate maksud CI pun tak tau? bodoh piang punya lobai, Patutlah lobai malaya dikutuk oleh ummah malaya! Kohkohkohkoh.........
Dah lah iq tahap longkang! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by sam1528 at 9-12-2018 12:17 PM
FOTHER-MUCKER replied at 9-12-2018 04:38 AM
Hahahaha...lobai samdol keluar estate maksud CI pun tak tau? bodoh piang punya lobai, Patutlah lobai malaya dikutuk oleh ummah malaya! Kohkohkohkoh.........
Dah lah iq tahap longkang!
He he he he ... lobai mat slow v2 dah terlampau marah , tetiba pakai pulak nick 'FOTHER-MUCKER'
Kesian ... hancur sudah semua argumen bodoh ko
Aku tak habis lagi
Research si mamat Dan Gibson ni ttg Petra memang tak ada tempat kat academia
Dlm banyak2 orientalist , hanya sorang aje yg review buku & research dia
Dia adalah Prof Michael Lecker
His review? Hmmm ... not so good
pg 466 is missing tapi I got part of it from here : Post by Unitarian Oct 6 2016 , 7.02am
“…Among the sources quoted are a daily newspaper, an Arabic television show, talks with devout Muslims and the registry of a local clinic in Ma‛ān (only 30 km from Petra) that includes an amazing number of ‘Quraysh names’. The annotated bibliography of early Islamic sources is an unnatural blend of Arabic books from different genres, but it has a major lacuna. The author claims (p. 370) to have examined the descriptions of Mecca in early Islamic literature, but the vast Arabic literature about Mecca is not there. Ṭabarī’s Qurʼān commentary is called ‘al-musammā (!) Jāmi‛ al-Bayān fī Taʼ wīl al-Qurʼ ān’ and Ibn Hishām is referred to throughout the book as Ibn Ḥishām. Moreover, Ibn Hishām is said (p. 375) to have been Ibn Isḥāq’s grandson. (Ibn Isḥāq is often referred to as ‘Isḥāq’.) Parts of the book have the quality of a travel book that could benefit from a thorough copy editing. It relies heavily on Internet sites that offer satellite images…”
Apa lah hauk punya research oleh mamat Dan Gibson
Sources dia adalah :
- a daily newspaper
- an Arabic television show
- talks with devout Muslims
- registry of a local clinic in Ma‛ān (only 30 km from Petra) that includes an amazing number of ‘Quraysh names’
Si mamat Dan Gibson mati2 klaim Ibn Hisham adalah cucu Ibn Ishaq ...this is soooo stupidly funny
Lagi comment Prof Lecker ttg buku (ie. research mamat Dan Gibson) :
'...Admittedly the question of qibla is a thorny one and solid research will probably lead to new results. (One has to bear in mind that in most cases a qibla directed to Petra is also one directed to Jerusalem) ...'
'...This book's imaginative writing may have its followers perhaps even in academic circles ...'
LOL ... ertikata lain , review by Prof Lecker ttg buku & research mamat Dan Gibson (ie. kononnya macam ko klaim Qibla pertama , Islam bermula & Nabi Muhammad(saw) lahir kat Petra) ... adalah ... jeng jeng jeng : sampah
Macamana skg tambi?
Its a scathing review of mamat Dan Gibson's work
Kalo tersebut adalah post graduate thesis dia ... garanti fail
Yg aku gelak besar : org macam mamat Dan Gibson lah yg ko mati2 percaya , kononnya boleh disprove Islam
Oops ... malu besar ko sekarang
Hanya org yg amat2 kureng cerdik malah bodoh sampai ke tulang , macam ko , akan percaya kat research si mamat Dan Gibson
Kah kah kah ... lobai mat low v2 dimalukan dgn amat terhina sekal lagi
'poooowww!!' - kena sebijik lagi
Sampai jalan pon dah mengengkang macam ni :
Terus lobai mat slow v2 jadik blur macam ni :
Ha ha ha ha ... lobai mat slow v2 masih lagi dlm kebodohan
|
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|