Genetik lagi penting dari Persekitaran untuk jadi pandai.

Cakkkk....aaaa

Genetics, not your school, is biggest factor in exam success:
DNA twice as significant as environmental factors
Study reveals a child's genes have greater impact on exam results than the quality of their school or efforts of their parents
Research carried out by King's College London
Echoes London Mayor Boris Johnson's controversial claims last month that success is linked to IQ
Educational achievement owes more to nature than nurture, it is claimed

A child's genes have a far greater impact on exam results than the quality of their school or the efforts of their parents, researchers claim.
Analysis of 11,000 teenagers’ GCSE results suggests that DNA is twice as significant as environmental factors such as school choice in determining educational success.
The study, published by researchers at King’s College London, will go some way towards swaying the course of the great nature vs nurture debate.

A child's genes have a far greater impact on exam results than the quality of their school or the efforts of their parents, a new study by King's College London has revealed.

It will also bolster the stock of London Mayor Boris Johnson, who last month provoked anger by suggesting that some people, ‘like cornflakes rising to the top of the packet’, reach powerful positions because they are naturally more intelligent than others.
The new study suggests that each child’s genes make, on average, a 58 per cent difference for their results in the core subjects of English, maths and science.

Environmental factors such as school, neighbourhood and the family home, are said to have an impact of just 29 per cent.

Other factors unique to each individual account for the remaining 13 per cent, the study suggests.
Genetics appear to have a bigger influence on results for science subjects than for humanities such as media studies, art or music – 58 per cent compared with 42 per cent.
Study leader Nicholas Shakeshaft said: ‘Children differ in how easily they learn at school. Our research shows that differences in students’ educational achievement owe more to nature than nurture.’
Mayor of London Boris Johnson provoked anger last month when he linked success in life to a person's IQ
However, he warned against assuming that educational achievements are ‘genetically predetermined’.
Instead, recognising the predispositions of each child may help improve learning, he said.
He said a personalised education that took account of children’s differences would be better than a ‘one size fits all’ system which ignores genetics.
The paper, published in the journal PLOS One, said the findings may come as ‘an uncomfortable realisation’ to those in education.
Many teachers and politicians fear that a genetic approach to education may lead to less intelligent children being written off.
But Professor Robert Plomin, who co-wrote the paper, said: ‘It means that educational systems which are sensitive to children’s individual abilities and needs, which are derived in part from their genetic predispositions, might improve educational achievement.’
The researchers compared the GCSE results of identical twins – who share 100 per cent of their genes – with those of non-identical twins, who share only 50 per cent of their DNA.
By subtracting the environmental impact, the scientists could disentangle nature from nurture and determine the impact of genes on the school results.
Most of the genes that contribute to educational success have yet to be identified, although a 2010 study discovered small variants linked to mathematical ability.
Mr Shakeshaft said: ‘Once we understand more about how the genetic influences work, or once we can identify potential problems early on, we’ll be better able to target specific interventions to help those individuals who might otherwise struggle.’

However other scientists warned that the study should be treated with caution.
Dr Simon Underdown, of Oxford Brookes University, said the research cannot show that intelligence is the product of one or two simple genes.
‘Rather it is managed by an intricate process that relies on genetic factors and environmental influences. The nature-nurture debate is not over yet,’ he added.
Sarah Norcross, director of the Progress Educational Trust, said the idea of tailoring education based on genetics should be treated with a ‘great degree of scepticism’.
Mr Johnson was accused of ‘elitism’ last month when he said some people would always find it easier to get ahead than others.
‘Whatever you may think of the value of IQ tests, it is surely relevant to a conversation about equality that as many as 16 per cent of our species have an IQ below 85, while about 2 per cent have an IQ above 130,’ he said.
He suggested that competition was good because it meant that those with natural ability would be pushed to work harder.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ ... .html#ixzz2nE4ylcp4
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

So... buat pasangan yg belum berkahwin... cari ler pasangan yg cerdik2 ya...

atira

ilmiah nye topic uols..
anak aku jgn jadi penyangak cam amenu tu pon syukurlah...
pandai tak pandai aku terima seadanye
actually pandai tak pandai boleh diejas

annehuda

bapak aku buruh binaan mak aku surirumah je. mcm mane aku bleh masuk u ye? adakah aku ni anak pungutan?

atira

hish... jadi buruh dan suri rumah bukan maknanye bodoh...
kalau diberi peluang... mungkin bapak ko boleh jadi menteri

tuah_r

yupss..iq... tak semestinya kerja kureng sket..iq rendah..

dan tak smestinya kerja power..iq tinggi..mcm menteri

atira

bayangkan dapat iq macam bung kebanatangan...
oh no !!!

ifanonline

isu genetics and environment is debatable... kalu gen pandai pun, tapi persekitaran cam haram jadah, tak pandai juga...and vice versa...

Maideen.

Tak per.....kalau tak berapa pandai pon boleh jadi ulamak......

NIXAR

x pandai xpa asal masuk parti yg betul. konpem kayo

atira

tu masalahnye kat malaysia..
yg pandai2 dipaksa buat engineering..
yg bodoh2 dipaksa jadi ulama..

dapat la ulama2 mesia sekarang

cherylrihanna

penah baca kat page medic ada jual ubat utk repair genetik.

taikor

Mahdey kata doktor2 semua masuk PAS. Yg bodoh2 masuk Amno.

Ini macam... jangan kawen ngan orang2 Amno

Cakkkk....aaaa

‘It means that educational systems which are sensitive to children’s individual abilities and needs, which are derived in part from their genetic predispositions, might improve educational achievement.’

ini intipati kajian tu sebenarnya... parents kena discover kehebatan dan minat anak dari awal.

mereka yang minat kemahiran kita bimbing kearah kemahiran/hobi... fokus on that..

ushioz

persekitaran bagi aku.

atira

so bukan la genetic sgt..
persekitaran jugak la yg penting

BotakChinPeng

Inovasi juga ditentukan oleh genetik.
Gen untuk inovasi tak sama dengan gen untuk IQ .
Itu sebab banyak top student bila keluar universiti tak boleh lawan pekerja yang bukan top student semasa di ipt

cmf_premierleag

kalau kat bod gossip, antara retis2 yg mahu baiki genetik/keturunan ialah zizan dgn tajuk tred EDISI MEMBAIKI/REPAIR GENETIK
sbb heols slalu kapel dgn pompuan2 kacuk pan asian kekdahnya

midori_katana

Haritu kan ada citer pasal pasangan suami isteri doktor yg suka serang cikgu kat skolah sbb anak dia tak pandai...he3

Bedah.Cun

atira posted on 11-12-2013 03:13 PM
ilmiah nye topic uols..
anak aku jgn jadi penyangak cam amenu tu pon syukurlah...
pandai tak ...

Genetik indon padan lar jadi penyangak macam juak2 tu pun,

Bedah.Cun

Kalau dah genetik makan taik macam Indon Pulau Java tu, berzillion2 tahun pun belum tentu berubah lagi. DNA tu dah bahaya macam DNA HIV+