|
|
Kawasaki C-1 Military Transport for RMAF - mari bincang
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Daripada Kawasaki C1, kenapa tak C-130J ganti C-130 yang lama + A400 utk Strategic airlift.
apa-apahal pun kita still perlu tactical transport which is C-130J. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enjin tu pulak pakai turboprop jenis pusher dengan blade kipas mcam
a400 tapi contra- rotating. ni mimpi aku ajer la.
specter Post at 1-10-2009 00:21 
mcm Tu 95 Bear ke bro?tgk Discovery aritu expert ckp enjin ni bising rabak...btw turbo prop lg sesuai utk ATM...jimat sket minyak...
xleh wat cam France ke beli C 130J dulu sementara nak tunggu A400M? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22# exocet
A'a propeller jenis contra rotating, blade kipas macam A400, tapi enjin taruk kat belakang jenis pusher..
tu cuma mimpi aku la..designer la yang kena design aircraft ni. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22# exocet
Bear punya kipas bising sebab pitch kasar tapi RPM tinggi...turboprop biasa sonyap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18# specter
Aku baca (kat wiki aje la) C-1 ni Jepun sendiri nak ganti dah...salah satu sebabnya, jarak penerbangan pendek (sebab doktrin defensif Jepun). Nak pi Okinawa pun tak lepas! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C130 kita pakai skg takleh upgrade ke spec J? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26# escortburuk
huk3, setakat extend fuselage bg sama panjang mcm J type oleh 'local kontraktor' that we all know who n nothing done to the engine/propeller n wing rasanya x memadai untuk menabalkan C-130 kita sebagai J model... huk3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27# venez
hahaha...
common problem is d contractor.
anyway, kalo mau C-130J, better beli baru laa... kalo upgrade rasanya tak berbaloi. Herc yg kita ada semuanya dah lanjut usia. yg terbaru kita beli pon ex-ANG punya C-130H. kalo upgrade pon tak memadai rasanya.
huhuhu.... apa daaa French nih. menyusahkan betol. kalo idak dah best jer pakai A400M. nampak gayanya kena induct 2-3 bijik C-130J gak laaa as an interim measure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nak lease C-1 nie jgn harap la weyyy. baik laaa cari DC-10 ka atau 737 cargo punya versi. boleh konfigurasikan utk kargo atau penumpung atau kedua- duanya sekali. lagi save. boleh ka Windof? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IL-78 tanker x ok ker buat AAR? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30# venez
buleh mmg buleh...
tapi lu ada brani ka? wa tara brani wooo mau naik itu aircraft. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29# tin
boleh... tapi wa rekomen itu A330 utk long range strategic angkut n AAR. 737 pon moleh...utk short airfield operation n medium range deployment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dengan adanya pesawat ini boleh menambah lagi keupayaan kita sebelum menunggu A400 hadir dalam inventori kita...apapun produk jepun juga setaraf dgn produk barat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33# tempur
Takda contender lain ke selain dari C-1 ni? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
choice terbaik C-130J ganti C-130 in my opinion for tactical airlift.
Better fuel consumption, better engine, better range, better payload, and proven C-130 airframe.
A 400M jadi kita punya medium-heavy transport. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34# pcboss
Wa minat C5 Galaxy - it aint pretty but can lug around lotsa lotsa stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22# exocet
Bear punya kipas bising sebab pitch kasar tapi RPM tinggi...turboprop biasa sonyap
alphawolf Post at 1-10-2009 08:30 
owh...RPM tinggi then Bear ni a/c dia kuat mkn minyak r camtu??baik diorang pakai enjin jet je alang2 minyak cam air sungai...mcm B 52...range pon jauh gak...
tp pepehal pon rasanya kalo TUDM nk urgent replacement yg paling logik skali C 130J...at least xde la byk buang duit antar ground crew training...stakat transport a/c rasanya kongress xde hal kot...bkn sensitive procuments... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C17 ada masuk LIMA 2009, ada ura2 ke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38# areguard
ada 2 biji kat subang skrg, huk3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C-130 digerakkan ke padang, medan untuk membawa pulang penuntut M'sia... huk3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 1-10-2009 01:56 AM
Author
