|
|
still ada lagi kan community org asli ni kat amazon kan?
yg idup cam zmn purba kan?
sian kan? igt semua dh maju
ada lagi yg x camni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #44 amazed's post
sampai sini ko jejak pasal mesiniaga tu yek! 
takpe off topik sket .. nanti aku on kan topik balik!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
percubaan untuk on topic balik :p
dalam post #37, ada mention pasal "Turkana Boy" ..
meh aa aku post sikit pasal tu ..
Turkana Boy or Nariokotome Boy is the designation given to fossil KNM-WT 15000, a nearly complete skeleton of an 11- or 12-year-old hominid boy who died 1.5 million years ago in the early Pleistocene. The skeleton was discovered in 1984 by Kamoya Kimeu, a member of a team led by Richard Leakey, at Nariokotome near Lake Turkana in Kenya. (wikipedia)
+ Some scientists believe erectus matured faster than modern humans, and that he was really about 9 years old (Leakey and Lewin 1992)
+ The brain size was 880 cc, and it is estimated that it would have been 910 cc at adulthood (a modern human of comparable size would be expected to have a brain size of about 1350 cc)
+ The boy was 160 cm (5'3") tall, and estimates are that he might have been about 185 cm (6'1") as an adult
+ Except for the skull, the skeleton is very similar to that of modern boys, although there are a number of small differences
+ The most striking is that the holes in his vertebrae, through which the spinal cord goes, have only about half the cross-sectional area found in modern humans
+ One suggested explanation for this is that the boy lacked the fine motor control we have in the thorax to control speech, implying that he wasn't nearly as fluent a speaker as modern humans are (Walker and Shipman 1996)
+ In the 1988 video Mysteries of Mankind, produced by National Geographic, Richard Leakey talks about this fossil :
"I think [the Turkana Boy] is remarkable because it's so complete, but perhaps another aspect that is often overlooked is that many people who don't like the idea of human evolution have been able to discount much of the work that we've done on the basis that it's built on fragmentary evidence. There have just been bits and pieces, and who knows, those little bits of bone could belong to anything. To confront some of these people with a complete skeleton that is human and is so obviously related to us in a context where it's definitely one and a half million years or even more is fairly convincing evidence, and I think many of the people who are fence-sitters on this discussion about creationism vs. evolution are going to have to get off the fence in the light of this discovery" |
Rate
-
1
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kita disogokkkan dgn bermacam2 teori barat...tapi tak pernah menyelongkar al-Quran...sedangkan al-Quran itu pemberitahuan dari Pencipta manusia... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #48 Lloni's post
RASANYA .. bukan takde atau tak pernah cuba nak selongkar 'rahsia' dalam al Quran
tapi MUNGKIN tak ramai yg berani nak teruskan atau nak cakap pasal benda ni
ye aa kan .. mungkin disebabkan berkaitan dgn al Quran & akidah ..
kalau nak diikutkan, ramai sebenarnya yg tertanya & nak tau pasal ni
cumanya .. takut 'sesat' .. takut 'terpesong' ..
mungkin tak dapat jumpa GURU yg benar2 menyampaikan yg benar .. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #47 naen's post
bagus informasi ni naen.... turkana boy.... tapi kecik lak saiz brain dier ekkk....  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #49 naen's post
|
betul. sbb guna al-Quran dan hadith nih x leh main cakap jerk.. so, aku mmg x berani ler.. lagipun kami bukan org yg layak tuk bincangkan benda tuh bedasarkan Al-Quran dan hadith... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by naen at 21-11-2008 01:24 AM 
RASANYA .. bukan takde atau tak pernah cuba nak selongkar 'rahsia' dalam al Quran
tapi MUNGKIN tak ramai yg berani nak teruskan atau nak cakap pasal benda ni
ye aa kan .. mungkin disebabkan ber ...
bukan itu saja --
tapi depa buat theory ni.. guna scientific research juga ---
pastu mana2 paleontologist tu... boleh buat perbandingan
tentang apa yang terkandung kat Quran tu...
dengan yang cerita2 tentang fossils yang dijumpai tu - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by JUSTcircle at 22-11-2008 01:19 AM
betul. sbb guna al-Quran dan hadith nih x leh main cakap jerk.. so, aku mmg x berani ler.. lagipun kami bukan org yg layak tuk bincangkan benda tuh bedasarkan Al-Quran dan hadith...
betul betul betul ..
kena berhati2 gak ngan apa yg dibaca online
baca tu boleh .. tapi kalau nak betul2 dalami, kena aa cari guru
isu pasal "adam sebelum adam" & "adam pertama - adam terakhir" ni,
sebenarnya banyak dibincang kat internet .. cumanya kena careful
sebab ada web yg penulisnya adalah anti-hadith .. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #55 naen's post
tapi dexa .. kekadang tu kena ingat gak ..
benda2 teori camni (terutamanya dari barat) ada banyak (tujuan) yg terselindung ..
either untuk 'mencari kebenaran' ataupun 'memalsukan kebenaran' ..
terpulang pada kita sendiri aa .. nak telan? nak hadam?
ataupun teruk beyakkan keluar (rujuk avatar amazed)?
kebanyakkannya pun memang ada udang harimau di sebalik meehoon bandung muar -
tapi... betul kata naen... sendiri kena bijak... sebab tu kena seek knowledge
baca bahan2 tu.. dan kalau baca quran tu faham kan tafsir
(saya tak selalu buat tu... faham sikit2 aje..) tapi rasanya benda2 tu kena ubahlah
supaya kita tak ignorant dan dapat berhujah jika ada anasir2 yang cuba
perdayakan kita and stuff--
saya tak faham yang naen post tu -- (bold tu) -
beyak tu apa.... tu poo poo ke?
yang macam naen sokmo kena tu -- sebab makan julap banyak
sangat -- kan? -- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #57 naen's post
kalau tak boldkan ..nanti naen tak sure lak yang mana --
ahhh... terus....bukan teruk... tu la.. type macam kambing...
mana saya nak faham... (saya pun sokmo gak typo..) -
saya rasa benda2 sejarah ni memang patut ambil tahu pun -
eh... saya ingat nak postkan badland yang saya pergi dulu
kat dinosaur provincial park... tu adalah satu tempat yang
paling saya suka pergi... dah ada scanner.. tapi saya macam
seram aje nak paste2 gambar dalam simpanan saya - tengoklah
saya kena crop sikit2 ambil yang penting -
tu pun kisah purba - sebab dinosaur berkumpul kat situ
bila depa nak mati 65 million years ago -
a great place - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rasul 300 lebih nabi 100000 lebih...mesti umr bumi ni dan Nabi adam diturunkan dah berjuta tahun.Takkan lah 10000 tahun... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #5 amazed's post
|
mana boleh buat logik gitu. kalo ko boleh buat lojik gitu,apa salahnya buat lojik bhw manusia baru ada 40k thn dulu..sama je...or 10k thn dulu.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Author
Post time 20-11-2008 06:55 AM
apa citer community natives kat amazon nih??? ni citer jaman lain... tarak kena mengena ngan amazon nih... ko leh esplenkan apa makna soklan ko nih, ekkkk...
![[LAGU2 LEMBUT UNTUK SAYA]: Songs That I Lie Down Looking At The Starry-Sky To](https://uf.cari.com.my/forumx/mforum/block/12/12f898fc7b346522d89562abcf569d74.jpg)
