..aktivis Bumiputra kesal individu yg.hina agama tidak didakwa

pyropura

A Sarawakian activist has questioned the Attorney-General’s Chambers’ (AGC) decision not to charge Islamic preacher, Syakir Nasoha, for his allegedly disparaging remarks about other religions.


Peter John Jaban, a Global Human Rights Federation (GHRF) vice secretary, claimed that the decision exposes double standards in the system, citing the case of Siti Nuramira Abdullah who was charged in court for her stunt in a comedy club in Kuala Lumpur where she allegedly removed her headscarf and baju kurung.

Advertising

Advertising
He said that while Siti Nuramira was charged under Section 298A of the Penal Code for causing disharmony, disunity or enmity, hatred or ill will on the grounds of religion, the AGC had decided that ‘no further action’ (NFA) will be taken against Syakir.


Peter said he was stunned when the investigation against Syakir found that he did not touch on religious sensitivity in the country.

"The authorities claimed that they watched the full video which is nearly one hour 30 minutes (where Syakir had allegedly insulted other religions) and said they did not find any wrongdoing and classified the case as NFA.

"On October 3, some 3,000 reports were lodged nationwide against the prea

pyropura

On October 3, some 3,000 reports were lodged nationwide against the preacher after a video showing him making comments against other religions and the Dayak community went viral in Borneo states and in Kalimantan, Indonesia,” he said.

Syakir was investigated under Section 505(c) of the Penal Code for making statements conducive to public mischief with intent to incite the community to cause them to commit an office against other communities, and Section 233 of the Communication and Multimedia Act 1998 for abuse of network services.

According to news reports, the AGC had decided not to charge Syakir as the video about him, which went viral in October last year, was taken out of context and did not touch on religious sensitivity in the country.

Asserting that the preacher’s remarks had created anger among the Dayaks, Peter said the Syakir should be charged under the Sedition Act or Section 298A(1) of the Penal Code for "spreading words that cause disharmony, disunity, or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill will, or prejudicing, the maintenance of harmony or unity, on grounds of religion”, which provides an imprisonment of up to five years, if found guilty.

Peter said it was disappointing that controversial preachers like Syakir and others in the country were allowed to do as they wished.

"Others (preachers) will also think they are untouchable, and they will think that they can keep repeating this and they will not be charged for sensitive comments aimed against minorities, including the Orang Asal of this country,” he said. — Borneo Post

dua_chzy

Senyum sinis.

dua_chzy

Acik2 yang delusional proclaim kita orang Islam tak hina agama laen pon,

pun boleh tersenyum sinis.

Decaffeinated

apa dia kata?

dayak pakai cawat tak reti undi ka

FOTHER-MUCKER

Mengapa tiada tindakan terhadap mereka hina agama lain, soal NGOon 16.7.220
SHARE TWEET Share to Pinterest Email This

Pengarah Eksekutif SIS Rozana Isa dan Timbalan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang P Ramasamy mempersoalkan keengganan peguam negara untuk mendakwa kes terbabit.

PETALING JAYA: Sebuah kumpulan hak asasi wanita mempersoalkan sikap dwistandard dalam kes penghinaan agama, khususnya kurangnya tindakan terhadap seorang penceramah yang memperlekehkan kepercayaan orang bukan Islam.

Sisters in Islam (SiS) mempersoalkan penggunaan budi bicara peguam negara untuk memutuskan “tiada tindakan lanjut” dalam kes itu.

Kumpulan itu menyatakan sikap dwistandard terhadap kes seorang wanita yang dihadapkan ke mahkamah kerana didakwa menghina Islam, manakala tiada tindakan diambil terhadap seorang pendakwah Islam kerana memperlekehkan kepercayaan orang bukan Islam.

Jabatan Peguam Negara (AGC) sebelum ini memutuskan untuk tidak mendakwa Syakir Nasoha atas alasan video penceramah itu telah diambil di luar konteks dan tidak menyentuh sensitiviti agama di negara ini.

Pengarah Eksekutif SiS Rozana Isa berkata Perlembagaan Persekutuan menyatakan bahawa setiap individu harus dilayan sama rata.

“Dalam kedua-dua kes itu, rakyat memberi reaksi serta respons besar terhadapnya tetapi, kerajaan menganggap satu kes ini lebih menyinggung perasaan daripada yang lagi satu, berdasarkan tindakan lanjut mereka terhadap dua kes ini,” katanya kepada FMT.

Rozana berkata lebih 3,000 laporan polis dibuat terhadap penceramah itu dan komuniti agama minoriti mungkin menganggap penguatkuasaan undang-undang berat sebelah.

Sementara itu, Timbalan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang P Ramasamy berkongsi sentimen sama dengan bertanya: “Mengapa penghinaan terhadap Islam atau orang Islam dipandang serius sedangkan penghinaan yang berulang terhadap bukan Islam diabaikan?”

“Adakah penghinaan terhadap Islam dan orang Islam dianggap lebih serius berbanding penghinaan terhadap agama bukan Islam dan orang bukan Islam?”

Beliau juga mempersoalkan keengganan peguam negara untuk mendakwa penceramah terbabit walaupun banyak kes berulang golongan itu menghina kepercayaan orang bukan Islam.

Pengasas Komuniti Muslim Universal, Aizat Shamsuddin berkata, pihak berkuasa tidak boleh terlalu cepat menghukum mereka yang dituduh menghina agama.

“Kes sebegini harus dikaji dengan teliti. Lebih baik bagi orang yang disabitkan kesalahan menyampaikan ucapan kebencian itu diberi kaunseling,” katanya.

Sumber | FMT Malaysia

FOTHER-MUCKER

Di mesjid dah lama mereka hina agama lain tetapi tak pernah diviralkan.

Pada tahun 2018 saudara saya ada bagi tau dulu dia selalu pergi mesjid tetapi tetapi disebabkan ceramah asik hina agama dan penganut agama lain membuatkan dia tidak lagi pergi ke mesjid.

tripleid

Geng liberal makin berani sejak kjaan so called melayu isle ni berkuasa..

Padang merbok yg kini sendu tersenyum sinis..

FOTHER-MUCKER

Sebab itulah mungkin mereka ni asik terhina dan dihina kerana sikap sendiri yang tidak adil.

pyropura

Krik krik krik tered iniy

pyropura

Krik krik krik tered iniy

Orenn1

FOTHER-MUCKER replied at 18-7-2022 06:22 PM
Di mesjid dah lama mereka hina agama lain tetapi tak pernah diviralkan.

Pada tahun 2018 saudara say ...

Aku  dr kecil2 selalu dgr ceramah masjid dekat rmh, speaker besar satu kampong dgr, mmg itulah cceramah or takzirahnya, khutbah jumaat menjadi2, hina agama n penganut agama lain, rendahkan agama org, tanam permusuhan dgn bukan islam, mmg biasa sgttt. huh

mbhcsf

hmm mula dah playing any human rights nyer card untuk back up .

Orenn1

mbhcsf replied at 21-7-2022 01:30 AM
hmm mula dah playing any human rights nyer card untuk back up .

Ko sntappp ke lobainita oiii; kebenaran memang pahitt

pyropura

mbhcsf replied at 21-7-2022 01:30 AM
hmm mula dah playing any human rights nyer card untuk back up .

Kenapa Muslim2 semua sebok nak pergi & tinggal di negara Barat yg.bebas hina agama?