Tele lense for nikon

beruducute

Assalamualaikum...nak mintan pandangan n pendapat kawan2 berkenaan ngan tele lense for nikon d7000...tak kisah la klau 3rd party pun tak pe...tujuan untuk shoot wedding....
tele lense apa yg bagus,,,n budget dlm rm2.5k ke bawah...
tq

Caranthir

Standard tele try la 70-200mm f2.8. Ada sigma ngan tamron.. rega baru maybe bawah sket 3k. rasanya la..

Kalau nak overall workhorse, 18-55, 24-70 just nice..

sue_cinta

any zoom lens more than 80mm dah considered tele...but, superiority masih kepada superzoom tele lens yg dew focal length more than 200mm...

any superzoom from Nikon yg disuggest adalah seperti...

1. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR
2. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR
3. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8G ED VRII <--- SUPERB

..or kalo nak yg budget from nikon...boleh juge considered
1. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR <--- (recommended)
2. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 55-300 f/4.5-5.6G ED VR (heavy than 55-200mm, but capaian lebih jauh)


...kalo nak yg third party pown adew...
1. Sigma AF 70-200mm f/2.8 APO <--- dalam ur budget bley dapat kowt
2. Sigma AF 70-200mm f/2.8 OS <--- alang2 mampu beli nie, baik simpan sket lg mek VR II
3. Tamron AF 70-200mm f/2.8 <--- dari mek nie better mek sigma (effect softness lebey kuat)
4. Tokina AF 80-200mm f/2.8

beruducute

. Sigma AF 70-200mm f/2.8 APO <--- dalam ur budget bley dapat kowt....
Ok tak quality pic?

sue_cinta

Reply 4# beruducute

sue penah guna lens nie occassionally laa utk wedding..outing... (pinjam from kawan)... berat bley tahan (mana-mana tele samew sebab saiz dia bagak)...kualiti...hmphhh.... most noticeable prob utk lens third party nie adalah dia nya problem ngan 'Softness'... it's something cam blur but not a bokeh...paham tak?
mende nie kire cam masalah vignette pada wide angle lens laa...vignette nie selalu kesan hitam kat keliling gambar kan? cuba ko bayangkan plak vignette kaler PUTIH kat gambo ko? camtuh laa softness tuh...

dari segi lain, cam distortion..color effect... mmg adew kurengnya berbanding lens asal Nikon/Canon laa...utk sony tak sure whether sigma adew wat mounting utk sony...kene usha2 balek...selalu riki utk nikon or canon jew...


kalo nak bandingkan kualiti...third party tele ikut rank sue laa..dari hasil penggunaan ikut experience using this 3 lens kat field...

1. Sigma AF 70-200mm f/2.8 OS (terbaik)
2. Sigma AF 70-200mm f/2.8 APO
3. Tamron AF 70-200mm f/2.8

but, kalo beruducute mampu nak amik sigma OS, why not simpan sket wet amik lens original dari pengeluar? lebey berbaloi-baloi cam iklan kamdar...hehehe

beruducute

Reply  beruducute

sue penah guna lens nie occassionally laa utk wedding..outing... (pinjam from  ...
sue_cinta Post at 26-8-2011 19:54

Tq sue....

akumirul

ambik sigma 70-200 2.8 la... tapi kena test betul2... sebab sigma ade yg copy dia mmg soft abis... ade yg sharp copy...

sue_cinta

maybe ko refer pada APO..mmg itew softness kuat...kalo OS...softness dia dah reduced...

beruducute

tq...tq,,,budget harga dlm brapa rm?

syahrul37

Mengikut review (aku x pernah pakai) Tamron 70-200 2.8 lg sharp dari Sigma..Dan harga lens dlm 2600-2800..Sigma lagi mahal (3k++) tapi autofocus lebih laju..Bajet lebih Nikon 70-200 2.8 VRII..

xiemean

aku target 80-200 f2.8 jer....lens lama xder VR pun....tapi bajet xcukup2..sob3...