IceMallet Publish time 31-3-2008 11:04 AM

Reply #197 RainbowSix's post

UAV pun masih terkial2 nak buat, ni nak hasilkan jet pejuang...baik depa concentrate buat UAV dan UCAV

yaminz Publish time 31-3-2008 02:58 PM

Reply #201 IceMallet's post

Baik concentrate buat enjin lg best, bole timba ilmu

StealthTuah Publish time 1-4-2008 08:49 AM

Reply #197 RainbowSix's post

Even aku selalu support local industry or research tapi sorila this one aku sangat skeptikal. At the very least start merangkak la dulu.light craft pun takde sape yang nak cuba buat with exception of MD33.fighter?very distant future

RainbowSix Publish time 1-4-2008 09:14 AM

Originally posted by StealthTuah at 1-4-2008 08:49 http://forum6.cari.com.my/images/common/back.gif
Even aku selalu support local industry or research tapi sorila this one aku sangat skeptikal. At the very least start merangkak la dulu.light craft pun takde sape yang nak cuba buat with exceptio ...

Mcm ni lah...yg buat proposal dan presentation tu semua yg bijak pandai...cuma masalah bukan RnD dan manufacturing tapi pasaran.

yaminz Publish time 1-4-2008 09:32 AM

Reply #204 RainbowSix's post

Yup, lum tentu lg TUDM nak beli...

windof Publish time 2-4-2008 06:00 AM

bagus la at least bijak pandai2 negara dah amik berat perkara nih. pasaran mmg akan jadi masalah, kecuali dimulakan oleh pengguna dlm negara dulu, jika terbukti kemampuan dan keupayaan bisa menandingi milik barat, nescaya menjadi rebutan negara2 dunia ke3 dan juga sahabat yg lain. the main thing is to show your credibility and quality 1st.

bulat Publish time 2-4-2008 08:22 AM

Reply #201 IceMallet's post

Artikel dlm Tempur ada sentuh ttg isu ni kan, ttg sebuah IPTA yg baru buat model roket pd tahap yg sgt asas, sdgkan roket mcm tu kat AS contohnya bebudak sekolah rendah je yg buat....

RainbowSix Publish time 2-4-2008 08:36 AM

Originally posted by windof at 2-4-2008 06:00 http://forum3.cari.com.my/images/common/back.gif
bagus la at least bijak pandai2 negara dah amik berat perkara nih. pasaran mmg akan jadi masalah, kecuali dimulakan oleh pengguna dlm negara dulu, jika terbukti kemampuan dan keupayaan bisa menan ...

Mengikut mereka, design dan pembinaan boleh diteruskan kerana mereka ada tenaga kerja yg mampu dan berkebolehan. Tetapi masalah utama adalah pasaran pesawat berkenaan. Jika pasaran amat kecil, kos pesawat memang tinggi (RnD + pembangunan +pembinaan). Jadi isu di sini adalah risiko utk meneruskan proposal tersebut.

tin Publish time 2-4-2008 09:44 AM

Reply #208 RainbowSix's post

hence the economics of buying it off the shelf.

but one must think of the manufacturing security.

sometimes a nation have to do it regardless the price.

example, its far better and cheaper to import rice from Thailand rather than launching paddy programs here. but it had to be done regardless the cost as it guarantees the security of rice production.

alphawolf Publish time 2-4-2008 10:10 AM

Sorry OT...there is need to for more RnD for higher yield rice since there are now fewer rice planters.

tin Publish time 2-4-2008 10:17 AM

Reply #210 alphawolf's post

yup. orang kampong pun dah maleh nak tanam dah.;P

RainbowSix Publish time 2-4-2008 04:07 PM

Reply #209 tin's post

Its called comparative advantage. Buying an item which is cheaper overseas.

Tapi mcm hang kata lah, kita tak belajar apa-apa kalau asyik beli aje.

venez Publish time 2-4-2008 04:24 PM

Reply #212 RainbowSix's post

tapi susah gak kalau beli sesuatu benda dalam kuantiti yang sikit but then nak mengaharapkan perpindahan teknologi dari luar ke dalam negara, sapa mau bagi teknologi 100%... he3

DarkBaron Publish time 2-4-2008 04:29 PM

food security very important seh nowadays. it seems that thailandi is the world's largest exporter of rice..malaysia has the land area. maybe should try to emulate?

venez Publish time 2-4-2008 04:34 PM

Reply #214 DarkBaron's post

kita banyak tanah but ramai yang jual tanah coz cepat jadi kaya... dulu kita xyah nak import2 beras coz pengeluaran beras kita mencukupi utk m'sia tapi sekarang masing2 malas tanam padi... why not every sawah padi kita buat bunker n airfield jerk... :lol:

RainbowSix Publish time 2-4-2008 04:38 PM

Reply #214 DarkBaron's post

I agree. In fact in the ensuing years, I think food security will be a major issue as population growth, depleting natural resources and economic instability will force nations to expand into agriculture, poultry and farming.

DarkBaron Publish time 2-4-2008 04:57 PM

Reply #216 RainbowSix's post

This idea of biofuels is bad in the long run i think..healthy acreage for food is now diverted to grow plants that will power up vehicles...world population increasing...the world's food exporters will be steadily reducing their exports or imposing higher tariffs as the years go by mark my words. The worst hit will be those countries who have very low self sufficiency in food production such as the phillipines, countries in africa etc..Even thailand and vietnam and india are starting to reduce their exports now. Philippines managed to secure from Vietnam for continuous rice imports. Wonder what they hand over to the Vietnamese for that. Some parts of their claims to the Spratlys? I think malaysia should start a big scale food nationalization plan. Buy up all the small crop holders land and convert into one giant food producing juggetnaut.

windof Publish time 2-4-2008 07:00 PM

ini jer satu2nya plan pak lah yg aku suka, menggerakkan semula negara ke arah pertanian dan jadikannya pertanian moden yg boleh menghasilkan makanan mencukupi utk negara dan juga utk ekspot. kita masih ada banyak tanah terbiar yg boleh digunakan sbg tempat menternak lembu dan kambing besar2an spt NZ dan OZ. Selain tu keluasan tanah di sarawak boleh dijadikan pusat pengeluaran beras besar2an negara. Penggunaan teknologi moden dengan pengurangan tenaga buruh atau petani mesti digunakan dengan meluas utk mencapai matlamat tersebut.
di samping tu, industri pembuatan berasaskan teknologi berserta RnD teknologi terkini tak boleh diabaikan utk menggerakkan mesia ke arah negara maju. Jangan pikirkan material semata2 sampai perkara asas utk kesinambunagan hidup manusia spt pengeluaran makanan dilupakan. kena check n balance selalu...

windof Publish time 2-4-2008 07:07 PM

Reply #208 RainbowSix's post

kalu lagu tu, kena buat survey kat dunia dulu tengok siapa yg berkenan nak pakai atau join sekaki dlm projek nih, kalu prospek baguih, boleh ler carry on. in other words, kena cari participants lain yg willing to commit in the project utk mendapatkan figure asas feasibility project nih. knowing the high quality of malaysian products and its reputation among 3rd world countries, ada kemungkinan projek ni boleh mendapat sambutan sekiranya produk berkenaan berkualiti dan berpatutan harganya.

windof Publish time 2-4-2008 07:13 PM

Reply #217 DarkBaron's post

sepatutnya minyak sawit dan masakan lain jangan dijadikan biofuel kerana akan menghancurkan harga makanan dunia. kalu nak buat biofuel make sure dari bahan yg tak boleh dimakan spt dari pokok ketaf tuh. allocatekan tanah2 yg tak digunakan utk pertanian lain utk projek ketaf nih, jangan disebabkan bahan bakar, masa depan manusia tergadai.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
View full version: M-MRCA utk TUDM


ADVERTISEMENT